International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 5,555 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -14,753. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,356,729–1,381,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 00:57
1,364,042
+1,003
19 Sept 2026, 06:36
1,363,039
-951
16 Sept 2026, 17:01
1,363,990
-965
14 Sept 2026, 17:20
1,364,955
-1,297
13 Sept 2026, 00:59
1,366,252
-809
11 Sept 2026, 03:36
1,367,061
+806
8 Sept 2026, 02:57
1,366,255
-537
4 Sept 2026, 23:59
1,366,792
+392
3 Sept 2026, 10:44
1,366,400
+849
2 Sept 2026, 06:18
1,365,551
+2,985
1 Sept 2026, 09:27
1,362,566
+545
31 Aug 2026, 08:37
1,362,021
+2,414
30 Aug 2026, 10:07
1,359,607
-870
29 Aug 2026, 11:35
1,360,477
-1,217
28 Aug 2026, 09:06
1,361,694
-844
27 Aug 2026, 06:26
1,362,538
-518
26 Aug 2026, 07:54
1,363,056
-431
25 Aug 2026, 04:42
1,363,487
-23
24 Aug 2026, 02:05
1,363,510
-1,212
22 Aug 2026, 07:09
1,364,722
first reading
Engagement
13,680 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 454 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.57%
avg views ÷ 1,364,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
62,300
4,106 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4,106
of 13,680 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
13,680 (29 June 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
255,921,682
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 02:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈108,000
Videos
≈202,000
Links
≈64,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25h 39m
Average length
2m 50s
Measured directly from 543 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 3,894 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (363 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 767 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 36.1% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 82.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 65,686 views — 4.82% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 78,358).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 9,166 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
بنیامین نتانیاهو، نخستوزیر اسرائیل، در مصاحبه با فاکسنیوز گفت اسرائیل اطلاعاتی را در اختیار بریتانیا قرار داده بود که نشان میداد حملهای با حمایت جمهوری اسلامی در حال برنامهریزی است، اما به گفته او، لندن «تقریبا روز بعد» اسرائیل را تحریم کرد.
نتانیاهو گفت: «ما اطلاعاتی را در اختیار بریتانیاییها گذاشتیم که نشان میداد قرار است حملهای انجام شود و این حمله تحت حمایت جمهوری اسلامی است. تقریبا روز بعد، آنها ما را ت…
تد کروز، سناتور جمهوریخواه آمریکا، در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز گفت کشته شدن اعضای حماس، حزبالله و سپاه پاسداران به دست اسرائیل، به گفته او، امنیت آمریکا را افزایش میدهد.
کروز گفت: «هر تروریست حماس که اسرائیل از میان برمیدارد، هر تروریست حزبالله که اسرائیل از میان برمیدارد و هر تروریست سپاه پاسداران که اسرائیل از میان برمیدارد، آمریکا را امنتر میکند.»
او افزود این گروهها به دنبال کشتن آمریکاییها هستند و پیشتر …
بنیامین نتانیاهو، نخستوزیر اسرائیل، گفت هنوز برای مشخص کردن عامل پشت تلاش خنثیشده برای سقوط پرواز فلایدبی از دبی به تلآویو زود است و اسرائیل ممکن است در تحقیقات درباره این حادثه مشارکت کند.
نتانیاهو چهارشنبه در گفتوگو با شان هنتی در شبکه فاکسنیوز، در پاسخ به سوالی درباره احتمال نقش جمهوری اسلامی در این حادثه گفت: «هنوز نمیدانیم.»
او گفت کمکخلبان مظنون در عربستان سعودی تحت بازجویی است و احتمالا به امارات متح…
دستور مارکو روبیو، وزیر خارجه آمریکا، برای خروج فوری هیات جمهوری اسلامی از آمریکا در شرایطی صادر شد که واشینگتن خود را در موقعیت برتر مذاکراتی میبیند و میانجیگری قطر نیز به بنبست رسیده است.
اکسیوس گزارش داد روبیو پس از ناکامی مذاکرات، دستور خروج هیات عباس عراقچی، وزیر خارجه جمهوری اسلامی، را صادر کرد. این رسانه نوشت آمریکا معتقد است جمهوری اسلامی دیگر کنترل موثری بر تنگه هرمز ندارد که بازگشایی آن را بهعنوان امتی…
اکسیوس به نقل از یک مقام آمریکایی و یک منبع آگاه گزارش داد مارکو روبیو، وزیر خارجه آمریکا، دوشنبه پس از به بنبست رسیدن مذاکرات با جمهوری اسلامی، دستور داد هیات همراه عباس عراقچی، وزیر خارجه جمهوری اسلامی، فورا نیویورک را ترک کند.
نمایندگی آمریکا در سازمان ملل همان شب این دستور را به نمایندگی جمهوری اسلامی ابلاغ کرد و هیات ایرانی ساعت ۱:۲۰ بامداد سهشنبه با پروازی از نیویورک به دوحه رفتند.
یک مقام آمریکایی به اکسیو…
پلیس سیستانوبلوچستان اعلام کرد علیرضا سنچولی، مامور انتظامی، بامداد پنجشنبه نهم مهر در حمله افراد مسلح به ایستوبازرسی احمدآباد در راسک کشته شد. پلیس از ادامه تلاش برای شناسایی و بازداشت مهاجمان خبر داد.
این در حالی است که علی خلیلآبادی، معاون امنیتی و انتظامی استاندار سیستانوبلوچستان، پیشتر گفته بود این حمله «هیچگونه خسارت یا اتفاق خاصی» در پی نداشته است. او گفت مهاجمان از سمت رودخانه به ایستوبازرسی تیرانداز…
دفتر شاهزاده رضا پهلوی با انتشار اطلاعیهای درباره ارسال ایمیلهای جعلی با عنوان «ایران در ۲۰۳۵» به شماری از افراد، فعالان و روزنامهنگاران هشدار داد.
بر اساس این اطلاعیه، فرستندگان این ایمیلها بهدروغ مدعی نمایندگی از شاهزاده رضا پهلوی شدهاند.
دفتر شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از دریافتکنندگان خواست به ایمیلهای «ایران در ۲۰۳۵» پاسخ ندهند، روی لینکهای موجود در آنها کلیک نکنند، فایلهای پیوست را باز نکنند و هیچ اطلاعات شخ…
پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا، چهارشنبه در سخنرانی برای نیروهای نظامی در پایگاه تفنگداران دریایی کوانتیکو در ویرجینیا گفت نیروهای آمریکایی بخشهای عمدهای از توان نظامی حکومت ایران را «نابود کردهاند» و به اهداف هستهای جمهوری اسلامی ضربه زدهاند.
هگست گفت: «آمریکاییها و متحدانشان نیروی دریایی ایران، نیروی هوایی ایران، سامانه دفاعی، رهبری، ظرفیت صنایع نظامی و تمام حوزه دفاعی آنها را نابود کردهاند.»
هگست افزود: «سپر م…
فرماندهی مرکزی آمریکا، سنتکام، با انتشار تصویری از ناو هواپیمابر «یواساس جورج اچ. دبلیو. بوش» در دریای عرب اعلام کرد نیروهای این فرماندهی تا چهارشنبه مسیر ۱۲۵ کشتی تجاری را برای اطمینان از رعایت محاصره دریایی جمهوری اسلامی تغییر دادهاند.
سنتکام پیشتر اعلام کرده بود تا سوم مهر مسیر ۱۲۲ کشتی تجاری را در چارچوب اجرای این محاصره تغییر داده است.
https://iranintl.com/202609309173
سپهر از ایتالیا: اینا چطوری برگشتن؟ برای ۲ تا پست اینستاگرامی ۷ ساعت تو سفارت بازجویی شدم
«یک ایران صدای شما را میشنود»
دوشنبه تا پنجشنبه ۱۱ شب تهران
از تلویزیون ایران اینترنشنال
تماشای نسخه کامل این قسمت از «برنامه» در یوتیوب:
https://youtu.be/ilIPAb6wKRM
@iranintltv
محسن از اراک: دغدغهٔ ما این نیست که کی میخواد برگرده ایران؛ همه نگران جنگ و گرونی هستند
«یک ایران صدای شما را میشنود»
دوشنبه تا پنجشنبه ۱۱ شب تهران
از تلویزیون ایران اینترنشنال
تماشای نسخه کامل این قسمت از «برنامه» در یوتیوب:
https://youtu.be/ilIPAb6wKRM
@iranintltv
عباس عراقچی، وزیر خارجه جمهوری اسلامی، در واکنش به اظهارات نخستوزیر بریتانیا درباره وجود «شواهد قوی» از نقش جمهوری اسلامی در حادثه پایگاه هوایی فرفورد، در ایکس نوشت: «من هم میتوانم باور ایران را تایید کنم که آزاد کردن افرادی که گفته میشود تروریستاند و برای دولتهای خارجی کار میکنند، خود گویای همهچیز است. شما کاملا مسیر را اشتباه رفتهاید.»
پنج مرد بریتانیایی یکشنبه در نزدیکی پایگاه فرفورد به ظن جرایم مرتبط با …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13,680 posts we hold for @iranintltv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iranintltv edited 61 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 105 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 119 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@iranintltv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@iranintltvspor named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مدافعان میهن (HDF) @sedayeiraniii · 19,762 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
حقوق ما @hoghoughma · 21,967 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
مجتبا پورمحسن/ Mojtaba Pourmohsen @mojtabapourmohsen · 23,788 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
شب نشيني هالو @sh_n_halloo · 25,936 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
زنگ انشا @Zang_e_Ensha · 27,687 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 September 2026
ایران اینتر نشنال @khabar_fori_official · 29,186 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
ایران اینترنشنال ورزشی @iranintltvsport · 44,718 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Iranwire @Farsi_Iranwire · 47,676 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
مسیح علینژاد @masih_alinejad · 56,208 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
من و تو Manoto Tv @Mnototv · 71,113 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
IndyPersian @Indypersian · 73,892 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
العربیه فارسی @Alarabiya_far · 81,592 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
RadioFarda @radiofarda · 109,711 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
اسرائیل به فارسی @IsraelinFarsi · 116,434 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Farsi VOA @farsivoa · 133,108 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
صدای امریکا | Farsi VOA @FarsiVOA_tv · 106,116 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
صرفا جهت اطلاع @serfan_jahateetelae · 142,308 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
تلویزیون منوتو @manototv · 379,440 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
BBCPersian @bbcpersian · 771,942 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
برای آزادی - ام پلاس M_plus @mojahedin_plus · 21,844 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
ایراننویس/ مرتضی اسماعیلپور @MEsmailpour · 46,108 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI @Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,492 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
خبرگزاری هرانا @hranews · 30,637 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,377 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 545 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
7 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Iran International ایران اینترنشنال” (@iranintltv), 1,364,042 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranintltv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.