Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟

Channel

چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟

@whynationsfail2019

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,663subscribers

+146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216091019
TypeChannel
Username@whynationsfail2019
Created9 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/whynationsfail2019

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,51611,66311,589.56 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,527 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,535 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,539 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,555 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,558 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,559 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,562 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,564 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,567 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,578 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,581 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,591 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,587 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,580 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,583 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,584 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,599 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,606 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,611 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,613 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,630 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,626 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,631 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,637 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,629 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,663 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,494–11,685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 02:0011,663+34
19 Sept 2026, 04:5611,629-8
16 Sept 2026, 22:1911,637+6
13 Sept 2026, 07:5611,631+5
11 Sept 2026, 11:3511,626-4
8 Sept 2026, 14:3911,630+17
5 Sept 2026, 08:1711,613+2
3 Sept 2026, 08:5211,611+5
2 Sept 2026, 04:4511,606+7
1 Sept 2026, 07:3611,599+10
31 Aug 2026, 07:5711,589+5
30 Aug 2026, 08:3511,584+1
29 Aug 2026, 08:1111,583+3
28 Aug 2026, 09:1211,580-7
27 Aug 2026, 08:5411,587-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:5311,591+10
25 Aug 2026, 03:3311,581+3
23 Aug 2026, 22:3611,578-1
22 Aug 2026, 04:0711,579+12
20 Aug 2026, 17:4611,567first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
3m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

951 reactions across 26 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍75579.4%
👎19620.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 976 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,370 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

همه می‌دانند که من از تفسیری عمیقاً آریستوکراتیک از تاریخ دفاع می‌کنم. من هرگز نگفته‌ام جامعهٔ انسانی باید از اساس آریستوکراتیک باشد؛ بلکه مدّعای من، چیزی فراتر از این است. آنچه من گفته‌ام و هم‌چنان با اطمینانی روزافزون بدان باور دارم، این است که جامعهٔ انسانی، چه بخواهد و چه نخواهد، ذاتاً و به اقتضای ماهیت خود هم‌واره آریستوکراتیک است. تا جایی که هرچه جامعه آریستوکراتیک‌تر باشد، جامعه‌تر است؛ و هنگامی که آریستوکراتی…

👍11

16 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,420 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Mehrannotes

🔻تحریف به مثابه روش؛ بررسی کیفی استنادات در پژوهش‌های کوئین اسلوبودیان ✍️ ترجمه، تنظیم و تلخیص: مهران خسروزاده این یادداشت نسبتا طولانی، به بهانه بررسی کتاب «حرامزادگان هایک» تنظیم شده است. قسمت اول قسمت دوم قسمت سوم قسمت چهارم قسمت پنجم قسمت ششم قسمت هفتم قسمت هشتم قسمت نهم قسمت دهم قسمت یازدهم قسمت دوازدهم قسمت سیزدهم قسمت چهاردهم قسمت پانزدهم قسمت شانزدهم قسمت هفدهم @Mehrannotes

👍7👎1

15 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈2,420 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @youngconservative

این پرونده‌ی مفصل و خواندنی در مورد «سیدجمال‌الدین اسدآبادی» را از دست ندهید. بریده‌ی اول بریده‌ی دوم بریده‌ی سوم بریده‌ی چهارم

👍5

14 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,560 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianPhoto

پل پوت کمونیسم را به مردم کامبوج تحمیل کرد و پیامدهای آن فاجعه‌بار بود. این رژیم مالکیت خصوصی و پول را لغو کرد، مدارس را بست، مذهب را ممنوع نمود و کل شهرها را به اردوگاه‌های کار اجباری فرستاد. پژوهشگران تخمین می‌زنند که ۲۰ تا ۲۵ درصد از جمعیت، به دست خمرهای سرخ کشته شدند. کمونیسم یعنی همین. @austro_libertarian

👍47👎7

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈4,350 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ما انسان‌های مدرن، نمی‌توانیم نکتهٔ کاملاً تازه‌ای در اخلاقیات یا سیاست یا هنر کشف کنیم. سنجیدن همه‌چیز با قضاوت شخصی یا خرد شخصی کاری خطیر است. جان پافورد

👍24👎2

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈2,900 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianPoll

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👎18👍2

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈3,430 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @alamehrpouia

در اینجا دوست‌مان مهران خسروزاده مطلبی تحقیقی را نوشته است که چگونه پایه‌ای‌ترین اخلاقیات آکادمیک در زمینهٔ نقل‌قول صحیح زیر پا گذاشته می‌شود و تمام این کارها را هم به نام دفاع از ارزش‌های انسانی انجام می‌دهند. متن مهران خودش به اندازهٔ کافی گویاست و نیاز به توضیحی ندارد. من می‌خواهم در همین رابطه به یک موضوع دیگر اشاره کنم. شما برای لحظه‌ای فرض کنید اصلاً میزس حتی از خود هیتلر هم فاشیست‌تر و نژادپرست‌تر بود! میزس ا…

👍18

3 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC≈3,970 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @FreemarketEconomy

شاهکار اقتصادی عصر طلایی دونالد ترامپ که پیشتر وعده داده بود؛ Rice: +45% Cotton: +27% Wheat: +25% Wool: +21% Rubber: +20% Cheese: +16% Tea: +15% Sunflower oil: +15% Palm oil: +15% Lumber: +14% Soybeans: +13% می‌گفتند‌، Golden Age در راه است! بالاخره وعده « عصر طلایی » محقق شد، فقط یک سوءتفاهم پیش آمد؛ ما فکر می‌کریدم طلایی شدن یعنی رفاه، نه فاکتور خرید! مهم‌ترین دلیل این جهش قیمت‌ها؟ تعرفه‌ها. قرار بود تعرفه‌ها …

👍44👎17

1 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈3,810 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IIFOM_COPhoto

منتشر شد: ⚜️برای یک آزادی جدید⚜️ نویسنده: موری نیوتن روتبارد مترجم: رامین احمدی انتشارات: نشر آماره تعداد صفحات: ۴۲۸ قطع: رقعی قیمت: ۱ میلیون و ۲۵۰ هزار تومان لیبرتارینیسم بدیل رادیکالی است که می‌گوید قدرت دادن به دولت نه تنها نتیجۀ مثبتی ندارد بلکه غیراخلاقی است. مورای نیوتون روتبارد، «آقای لیبرتاریَن» و «بزرگ‌ترین دشمن زندۀ دولت» لقب گرفت. بله، او پیشینیان بسیاری داشت که از آنها بهره گیرد؛ کل سنت لیبرالیسم …

👍8👎4

28 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈4,380 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @mortezakazemii

آیا شریعتی «شیاد» نبود؟ 📝مرتضی کاظمی هر کسی تجربه‌ای شخصی از مواجهه با آثار علی شریعتی دارد. این نوشته، تجربه شخصی من است. از نظر من، علی شریعتی یک «شیاد» بود. منظورم از شیاد کسی است که برای پیشبرد یک هدفِ سیاسی و ایدئولوژیک؛ تاریخ، دین یا واقعیت را به گونه‌ای بازسازی کند که مخاطب به نتیجه‌ای برسد که با شواهد تاریخی سازگار نیست. با این تعریف، من علی شریعتی را یک شیاد می‌دانم. مطالعه کتاب‌های شریعتی در نوجوانی و پی…

👍66👎15

24 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC≈10,600 views77 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ما نوآیین‌های مکتب ر‌وسو نیستیم؛ما حواریون ولتر نیستیم؛ هلوتیوس در ما پیشرفتی نداشته است؛ بی‌خدایان موعظه‌گران ما نیستند؛دیوانگان، قانون‌گذاران ما نیستند. ما قلبی از گوشت و خون داریم که در سینه‌هامان می‌تپد؛ از خدا می‌ترسیم، با احترام به پادشاهان خود می‌نگریم، با حرمت به کشیشان، و با احترام به اشراف. ادموند برک

👍43👎34

10 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC≈6,240 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @austrianschool

*محبوبیت تجارت آزاد پس از دهه گرسنگی در بریتانیا/ زنگ تاریخ* ◻️قیمت غلات در دهه ۱۸۴۰ در بریتانیا به شدت بالا رفت که قوانین غلات (تعرفه‌های بسیار سنگین برای واردات غلات) یکی از علل اصلی آن بود. گرسنگی ناشی از این جهش قیمت در اين دهه به «گرسنگی دهه چهل» معروف شد. این گرسنگی باعث شد بحث تجارت آزاد و لغو ممنوعیت واردات به محور اصلی بحث‌های مردم بریتانیا تبدیل شود. ◻️مجله اکونومیست در همین دهه و در سال ۱۸۴۳ تأسیس شد و س…

👍30👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @whynationsfail2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTCFinal Results794 voters

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خاطرات و خطرات
@khateraaat · 22,195
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
چُراز
@choraz · 25,367
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 43,020
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,604
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Anarconomy
@anarconomy · 46,502
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
پروژه تاریخ شفاهی ایران در دانشگاه هاروارد
@tarikh_shafahi_iran_project · 57,443
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
اقوال الانعام
@aqvalanam · 40,125
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Aasoo - آسو
@NashrAasoo · 29,328
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
علم سیاست
@PoliticalScience_ir · 26,305
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,278
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
جامعه‌شناسی
@iransociology · 37,496
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,361
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Discourse
@Discourseees · 23,888
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
راه نو🖤
@Newwaypolitics · 21,150
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
فردای اقتصاد
@feghtesad · 61,885
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
کتابخانه بین المللی
@LibraryinternationaL · 20,715
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
کتابخانه تاریخ ما
@pdf_tarikhema · 45,874
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
یدالله کریمی پور
@Karimipour_K · 21,385
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی
@ghomeishi3 · 33,776
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
اتاق آینده / شیرعلی‌نیا
@jafarshiralinia · 44,849
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
I am Zeus
@zeus110 · 23,154
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
اقتصاد به زبان ساده
@eghtesaderooz · 55,554
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟” (@whynationsfail2019), 11,663 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whynationsfail2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.