Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟

@whynationsfail2019

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,547subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216091019
TypeChannel
Username@whynationsfail2019
Description2016///۱۳۹۵ شروع مجدد: 9March2019/// اسفند ماه ۱۳۹۷ زندگی👨‍👩‍👧 مالکیت🚧 آزادی🗽 پُست آغازین کانال👇 https://t.me/whynationsfail2019/2
Created9 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/whynationsfail2019

Growth

11,51611,54711,531.56 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,527 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,535 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,539 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,511–11,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:4411,547+3
12 Aug 2026, 06:2711,544+5
11 Aug 2026, 09:2311,539+4
10 Aug 2026, 07:5611,535+8
9 Aug 2026, 08:3111,527+7
8 Aug 2026, 07:3811,520+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:1211,516-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:3011,519+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:1511,517no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:0811,517first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 11,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,480
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held23 (9 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total24,360
Reactions total269
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,320
Videos
452
Links
460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
3m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

830 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍65178.4%
👎17921.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 855reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,710 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ما انسان‌های مدرن، نمی‌توانیم نکتهٔ کاملاً تازه‌ای در اخلاقیات یا سیاست یا هنر کشف کنیم. سنجیدن همه‌چیز با قضاوت شخصی یا خرد شخصی کاری خطیر است. جان پافورد

👍16

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,410 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianPoll

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👎15👍2

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,940 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @alamehrpouia

در اینجا دوست‌مان مهران خسروزاده مطلبی تحقیقی را نوشته است که چگونه پایه‌ای‌ترین اخلاقیات آکادمیک در زمینهٔ نقل‌قول صحیح زیر پا گذاشته می‌شود و تمام این کارها را هم به نام دفاع از ارزش‌های انسانی انجام می‌دهند. متن مهران خودش به اندازهٔ کافی گویاست و نیاز به توضیحی ندارد. من می‌خواهم در همین رابطه به یک موضوع دیگر اشاره کنم. شما برای لحظه‌ای فرض کنید اصلاً میزس حتی از خود هیتلر هم فاشیست‌تر و نژادپرست‌تر بود! میزس ا

👍17

3 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC≈3,000 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @FreemarketEconomy

شاهکار اقتصادی عصر طلایی دونالد ترامپ که پیشتر وعده داده بود؛ Rice: +45% Cotton: +27% Wheat: +25% Wool: +21% Rubber: +20% Cheese: +16% Tea: +15% Sunflower oil: +15% Palm oil: +15% Lumber: +14% Soybeans: +13% می‌گفتند‌، Golden Age در راه است! بالاخره وعده « عصر طلایی » محقق شد، فقط یک سوءتفاهم پیش آمد؛ ما فکر می‌کریدم طلایی شدن یعنی رفاه، نه فاکتور خرید! مهم‌ترین دلیل این جهش قیمت‌ها؟ تعرفه‌ها. قرار بود تعرفه‌ها

👍40👎16

1 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,970 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IIFOM_COPhoto

منتشر شد: ⚜️برای یک آزادی جدید⚜️ نویسنده: موری نیوتن روتبارد مترجم: رامین احمدی انتشارات: نشر آماره تعداد صفحات: ۴۲۸ قطع: رقعی قیمت: ۱ میلیون و ۲۵۰ هزار تومان لیبرتارینیسم بدیل رادیکالی است که می‌گوید قدرت دادن به دولت نه تنها نتیجۀ مثبتی ندارد بلکه غیراخلاقی است. مورای نیوتون روتبارد، «آقای لیبرتاریَن» و «بزرگ‌ترین دشمن زندۀ دولت» لقب گرفت. بله، او پیشینیان بسیاری داشت که از آنها بهره گیرد؛ کل سنت لیبرالیسم

👍7👎4

28 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈3,730 views78 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @mortezakazemii

آیا شریعتی «شیاد» نبود؟ 📝مرتضی کاظمی هر کسی تجربه‌ای شخصی از مواجهه با آثار علی شریعتی دارد. این نوشته، تجربه شخصی من است. از نظر من، علی شریعتی یک «شیاد» بود. منظورم از شیاد کسی است که برای پیشبرد یک هدفِ سیاسی و ایدئولوژیک؛ تاریخ، دین یا واقعیت را به گونه‌ای بازسازی کند که مخاطب به نتیجه‌ای برسد که با شواهد تاریخی سازگار نیست. با این تعریف، من علی شریعتی را یک شیاد می‌دانم. مطالعه کتاب‌های شریعتی در نوجوانی و پی

👍64👎14

24 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC≈9,600 views74 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ما نوآیین‌های مکتب ر‌وسو نیستیم؛ما حواریون ولتر نیستیم؛ هلوتیوس در ما پیشرفتی نداشته است؛ بی‌خدایان موعظه‌گران ما نیستند؛دیوانگان، قانون‌گذاران ما نیستند. ما قلبی از گوشت و خون داریم که در سینه‌هامان می‌تپد؛ از خدا می‌ترسیم، با احترام به پادشاهان خود می‌نگریم، با حرمت به کشیشان، و با احترام به اشراف. ادموند برک

👍41👎33

10 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC≈5,460 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @austrianschool

*محبوبیت تجارت آزاد پس از دهه گرسنگی در بریتانیا/ زنگ تاریخ* ◻️قیمت غلات در دهه ۱۸۴۰ در بریتانیا به شدت بالا رفت که قوانین غلات (تعرفه‌های بسیار سنگین برای واردات غلات) یکی از علل اصلی آن بود. گرسنگی ناشی از این جهش قیمت در اين دهه به «گرسنگی دهه چهل» معروف شد. این گرسنگی باعث شد بحث تجارت آزاد و لغو ممنوعیت واردات به محور اصلی بحث‌های مردم بریتانیا تبدیل شود. ◻️مجله اکونومیست در همین دهه و در سال ۱۸۴۳ تأسیس شد و س

👍29👎2

9 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈5,080 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«غمی که بر جان نشست» را از طاقچه دریافت کنید https://taaghche.com/book/289493

👎6👍3

6 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈6,090 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

چیزی به نام چاله‌ی فراموشی وجود ندارد. همیشه یک نفر زنده می‌ماند تا داستان را بازگو کند. هانا آرنت

👍58👎8

6 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC≈6,090 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

بدفهمی زمانِ حالْ محصول گریزناپذیر جهل نسبت به گذشته است. مارک بلوخ

👍38

3 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈8,020 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

مشروطهٔ ایران حتی فاقد افسانه بنیانگذار است و بیشتر در نابودی قدرت دربار توفیق یافته است تا اینکه نظم سیاسی جدیدی را بنیاد گذاشته باشد. در حقیقت مشروطه پایان یک نهاد سیاسی کهن بود نه سرآغاز بنایی نو. مشروطه حتی نتوانست ارزشها را متحول کند و موقعیت‌های اجتماعی را چندان تغییر دهد. اینکه ظل‌السلطان توسط مجلس با جار و جنجال از حکومت اصفهان معزول شود و سپس به شخصیت مورد وثوق مشروطه‌طلبان بدل گردد یا شیخ نوری از حامی بزرگ

👍45👎17

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @whynationsfail2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTCFinal Results794 voters

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 571,525 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سخنرانی‌ها
@sokhanranihaa · 131,306
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟” (@whynationsfail2019), 11,547 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whynationsfail2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.