Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟

Channel

چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟

@whynationsfail2019

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,780subscribers

+263 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216091019
TypeChannel
Username@whynationsfail2019
Description2016///۱۳۹۵ شروع مجدد: 9March2019/// اسفند ماه ۱۳۹۷ زندگی👨‍👩‍👧 مالکیت🚧 آزادی🗽 پُست آغازین کانال👇 https://t.me/whynationsfail2019/2
Created9 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/whynationsfail2019

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,51611,78011,6486 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,476–11,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:5511,780+11
9 Nov 2026, 20:4811,769+4
8 Nov 2026, 11:0711,765+6
7 Nov 2026, 04:3511,759-2
6 Nov 2026, 07:3911,761+5
5 Nov 2026, 05:4011,756+9
4 Nov 2026, 07:5611,747+2
3 Nov 2026, 11:0611,745-13
1 Nov 2026, 14:1011,758+3
31 Oct 2026, 14:4011,755-3
30 Oct 2026, 15:3611,758+5
29 Oct 2026, 17:2011,753+2
28 Oct 2026, 20:0811,751+2
27 Oct 2026, 20:2811,749+2
26 Oct 2026, 22:1411,747+10
25 Oct 2026, 22:1611,737+2
25 Oct 2026, 00:3711,735+8
24 Oct 2026, 00:4511,727+4
23 Oct 2026, 00:5811,723+1
21 Oct 2026, 22:5111,722first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 11,780 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held33 (9 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total4,620
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,320
Videos
≈453
Links
≈464

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 04s
Average length
2m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,281 reactions across 32 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,03180.5%
👎25019.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC≈1,480 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Veritas_vos_liberabitt

ما باید بتوانیم روشن‌تر درک کنیم که دقیقاً به چه دلیلی «انسان توده‌ای» به این آسانی به فردی متعصب تبدیل می‌شود. آنچه به گمانم دریافته‌ام این است که چنین نفوذپذیری و تأثیرپذیری‌ای ناشی از این واقعیت است که انسان — یعنی همان فرد — برای تعلق یافتن به توده و تبدیل شدن به یک انسان توده‌ای، ناگزیر بوده است به‌عنوان یک پیش‌نیاز، هرچند بدون کمترین آگاهی از آن، خود را از آن واقعیت جوهری که با فردیت نخستین او، یا بهتر بگویم با…

👍11

18 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC≈3,140 views41 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @FreemarketEconomy

لابد در تایم‌لاین‌های فارسی هم خوانده‌اید که اعتراضات اخیر فرانسه را، مثل همیشه، به سیاه‌پوستان و جنبش‌های طرفدار اسلام و فلسطین نسبت داده‌اند! تحلیل‌های دایی‌جان‌ناپلئونی و اطلاعات آب‌دوغ‌خیاری، به‌جای بررسی ریشه‌های اقتصادی و سیاسی اعتراضات؛ انگار همیشه باید یک مقصر آماده پیدا کرد! جامعه فرانسه از نظر تاریخی گرایش زیادی به مداخله دولت در اقتصاد داشته است. بخش بزرگی از مردم انتظار دارند دولت بازار را کنترل کند، بر…

👍30👎11

7 Oct 2026, 04:11 UTC≈4,080 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

کتاب کنش انسانی اثر لودویگ فون میزس از نشر کازیوه | کتابراه https://ketabrah.com/book/108489-%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%A8-%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C خوشبختانه کتاب کنش انسانی بازویرایش مجدد شده و از سوی عزیزان در کتابراه در اختیار علاقه مندان گذاشته شده.. دوستان می توانند نسخه نهایی را به صورت پی دی اف یا ای پاب در کتابراه دریافت کن…

👍8

20 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC≈5,570 views42 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarian

آلمان در سال ۱۹۴۸ نظام کنترل قیمت‌ها را کنار گذاشت و نظاره‌گر آن شد که چگونه اقتصادش ظرف هجده ماه از خاکستر خود برخاست. لودویگ اِرهارد این کار را یک‌جانبه و به تنهایی انجام داد. در ۲۰ ژوئن ۱۹۴۸، او کنترل‌های قیمت و دستمزد به‌جامانده از دوران نازی‌ها—که نیروهای اشغالگر متفقین همچنان حفظش کرده بودند—را لغو کرد؛ سپس پشت رادیو رفت و پیش از آنکه کسی بتواند جلویش را بگیرد، آنچه را انجام داده بود به گوش مردم آلمان رساند. م…

👍39👎3

17 Sept 2026, 11:15 UTC≈5,010 views42 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

تروریسم در انقلاب فرانسه، تبدیل به مشخصهٔ پاکی و اخلاص شد. الی کدوری

👍38👎4

12 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC≈5,480 views119 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianVideo

فرماندار تگزاس اقتصاد ایالت خود را با اقتصاد روسیه مقایسه کرد. تمام حضار ازخنده روده بر شدند فرماندار: اقتصاد تگزاس به‌تنهایی از اقتصاد روسیه بزرگ‌تر است. این باعث می‌شود من از پوتین قدرتمندتر باشم. 🇺🇸 تگزاس تولید ناخالص داخلی: ۳,۰۳۵ میلیارد دلار میانگین حقوق: ۵,۶۴۶ دلار حداقل دستمزد: ۱,۲۵۷ دلار 🇷🇺 روسیه تولید ناخالص داخلی: ۲,۵۶۱ میلیارد دلار میانگین حقوق: ۵۹۴ دلار حداقل دستمزد: ۳۲۳ دلار @austro_libertarian

👍97👎22

27 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈8,230 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

همه می‌دانند که من از تفسیری عمیقاً آریستوکراتیک از تاریخ دفاع می‌کنم. من هرگز نگفته‌ام جامعهٔ انسانی باید از اساس آریستوکراتیک باشد؛ بلکه مدّعای من، چیزی فراتر از این است. آنچه من گفته‌ام و هم‌چنان با اطمینانی روزافزون بدان باور دارم، این است که جامعهٔ انسانی، چه بخواهد و چه نخواهد، ذاتاً و به اقتضای ماهیت خود هم‌واره آریستوکراتیک است. تا جایی که هرچه جامعه آریستوکراتیک‌تر باشد، جامعه‌تر است؛ و هنگامی که آریستوکراتی…

👍28👎4

16 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈6,680 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @Mehrannotes

🔻تحریف به مثابه روش؛ بررسی کیفی استنادات در پژوهش‌های کوئین اسلوبودیان ✍️ ترجمه، تنظیم و تلخیص: مهران خسروزاده این یادداشت نسبتا طولانی، به بهانه بررسی کتاب «حرامزادگان هایک» تنظیم شده است. قسمت اول قسمت دوم قسمت سوم قسمت چهارم قسمت پنجم قسمت ششم قسمت هفتم قسمت هشتم قسمت نهم قسمت دهم قسمت یازدهم قسمت دوازدهم قسمت سیزدهم قسمت چهاردهم قسمت پانزدهم قسمت شانزدهم قسمت هفدهم @Mehrannotes

👍9👎1

15 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈5,310 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @youngconservative

این پرونده‌ی مفصل و خواندنی در مورد «سیدجمال‌الدین اسدآبادی» را از دست ندهید. بریده‌ی اول بریده‌ی دوم بریده‌ی سوم بریده‌ی چهارم

👍5

14 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈4,840 views69 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianPhoto

پل پوت کمونیسم را به مردم کامبوج تحمیل کرد و پیامدهای آن فاجعه‌بار بود. این رژیم مالکیت خصوصی و پول را لغو کرد، مدارس را بست، مذهب را ممنوع نمود و کل شهرها را به اردوگاه‌های کار اجباری فرستاد. پژوهشگران تخمین می‌زنند که ۲۰ تا ۲۵ درصد از جمعیت، به دست خمرهای سرخ کشته شدند. کمونیسم یعنی همین. @austro_libertarian

👍60👎9

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈6,390 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

ما انسان‌های مدرن، نمی‌توانیم نکتهٔ کاملاً تازه‌ای در اخلاقیات یا سیاست یا هنر کشف کنیم. سنجیدن همه‌چیز با قضاوت شخصی یا خرد شخصی کاری خطیر است. جان پافورد

👍30👎2

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈4,750 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @austro_libertarianPoll

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👎21👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @whynationsfail2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTCFinal Results794 voters

درآمد ماهانه شما حدودا چند دلار است؟

  1. هزار و بیشتر10%
  2. هفتصد و بیشتر5%
  3. چهارصد و بیشتر12%
  4. دویست و بیشتر21%
  5. ۸۰ و بیشتر21%
  6. ۸۰ به پایین33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خاطرات و خطرات
@khateraaat · 22,710
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
چُراز
@choraz · 25,611
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 47,404
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,323
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Anarconomy
@anarconomy · 46,078
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
پروژه تاریخ شفاهی ایران در دانشگاه هاروارد
@tarikh_shafahi_iran_project · 58,229
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
اقوال الانعام
@aqvalanam · 41,105
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Aasoo - آسو
@NashrAasoo · 29,061
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
علم سیاست
@PoliticalScience_ir · 27,611
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,730
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
جامعه‌شناسی
@iransociology · 37,367
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
دیپلماسی
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,746
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,842
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
Discourse
@Discourseees · 25,238
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
راه نو🖤
@Newwaypolitics · 21,932
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
فردای اقتصاد
@feghtesad · 64,311
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
کتابخانه بین المللی
@LibraryinternationaL · 20,364
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
کتابخانه تاریخ ما
@pdf_tarikhema · 46,369
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
یدالله کریمی پور
@Karimipour_K · 21,452
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
تاریخ فلسفه با ابوذر شریعتی
@abouzar_shariatii · 32,295
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی
@ghomeishi3 · 33,442
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,118
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
اتاق آینده / شیرعلی‌نیا
@jafarshiralinia · 44,010
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
[ کتابکده علوم سیاسی ]
@PoliticalLibrary · 19,163
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟” (@whynationsfail2019), 11,780 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whynationsfail2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.