Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

داوطلب

@davtalaborg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,531subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470427740
TypeChannel
Username@davtalaborg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/davtalaborg

Growth

2,5312,5422,536.56 August 2026 — 2,542 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,542 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,541 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,534 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,531 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,529–2,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:332,531-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:322,534-7
6 Aug 2026, 18:402,541-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:462,542no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:372,542first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.46%
avg views ÷ 2,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,627
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 23s
Average length
3m 12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3371.7%
1123.9%
💔12.17%
🔥12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC28 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻معرفی کارزارها: کارزار درخواست افزایش مزایای جانبی حقوق بازنشستگان تأمین اجتماعی این طومار (پتیشن جمع‌آوری امضا) که از ۱۵ خرداد شروع شده، بر روی یک «شکاف رفاهی» در قوانین بودجه دست گذاشته و استدلال می‌کند که منجمد ماندن مزایا و اقلام رفاهی فیش‌های حقوقی (مانند حق مسکن، بن معیشت و حق عائله‌مندی) در سال ۱۴۰۵، عملاً اثر افزایش‌های حداقلی پایه حقوق را از بین برده است. این کارزار با بیش از ۱۵هزار امضا به بیش از نیمی

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻آیا قرار است با تبدیل وضعیت کارگران، شاهد به تاریخ پیوستن پیمانکارها باشیم؟ گزارش تحلیلی داوطلب اختلاف اصلی بین کارگران، دولت و کارشناسان درباره اصل وجود پیمانکار نیست بلکه پرسش این است که «آیا می‌توان از پیمانکاری برای فعالیت‌هایی استفاده کرد که ماهیت دائمی دارند، بدون آنکه امنیت شغلی و حقوق نیروی کار تضعیف شود؟» در کشورهای مختلف می‌بینیم که دولت گاهی از پیمانکار برای پروژه‌های مشخص یا فعالیت‌های تخصصی و موقت ا

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC205 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻چرا تشکیل ده‌ها تشکل کارفرمایی امری عادی است، اما ایجاد حتی چند اتحادیه مستقل کارگری به پدیده‌ای استثنایی تبدیل شده است؟ این روزها بعضی‌ها می‌پرسند چرا از این همه تشکل صنفی که در کشور ثبت شده، تقریبا تمام آن‌ها تشکل کارفرمایی‌ است؟ پس چرا هیچ تشکلی به نام کارگرها نیست؟ (آیا کارفرماها بیشتر از کارگران علاقه دارند دور هم بنشینند، با هم متحد شوند و برای مراقبت از منافع خودشان تشکل بسازند یا موضوع چیز دیگری است؟) تفاو

1👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC106 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔻بدون تشکل، وقتی سیستم اشتباه می‌کند کارگر باید دوندگی کند! ▫️ روند بازرسی‌های تأمین اجتماعی به یکی از مهم‌ترین عوامل قطع بیمه کارگران ساختمانی تبدیل شده است. ماهیت سیار شغل کارگران باعث می‌شود بازرس در محل کار حضور آن‌ها را تأیید نکند و بیمه قطع شود. کارگر روزمزد امروز در یک پروژه و فردا در پروژه دیگری کار می‌کند، اما سیستم بازرسی همچنان بر حضور ثابت تأکید دارد! ▫️ کارگران مجبور می‌شوند برای ثبت آدرس جدید یک روز ک

3👍2

6 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC142 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ بهای ادامه کمبود نیرو: پرستاران بی سروصدا سر کار می‌میرند مرگ سه پرستار به دلیل فشار کاری، آن هم طی فقط دو هفته، هنوز نتوانسته برای درصدی از ۶۰هزار پرستار خانه‌نشین، شغل یا امنیت شغلی بیاورد. حتی رسانه‌های رسمی نیز خبر مرگ پرستاران را پوشش نمی‌دهند. طب اورژانس نوشت: گاهی مرگ، فقط یک خبر نیست؛ یک هشدار است 🖤حسین خسروی، پرستار جوان بیمارستان شهید چمران بروجرد، در حین انجام شیفت کاری، پس از احساس ناخوشی به اتاق اس

👍21💔1

6 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC135 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻گروه‌های مردم در بحران اقتصادی یاد می‌گیرند که وابستگی به اقتصاد رسمی را کاهش بدهند. در مواجهه با بحران‌های اقتصادی و محیطی، تاب‌آوری جامعه نه در فردگرایی، بلکه در عبور به سمت «همبستگی استراتژیک» است. مدل‌هایی نظیر شبکه‌های مبادله (آرژانتین)، آشپزخانه‌های اجتماعی (یونان)، باغچه‌های پیروزی (اروپا) و بانک زمان نشان می‌دهند که چگونه با «اقتصاد همبستگی» می‌توان ضمن حفظ کرامت انسانی، شبکه‌های حمایتی محلی برای بقا ساخت.

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC312 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻در تورم سه‌رقمی، تشکل‌ها باید شیپور بحران و نیاز به حمایت را به صدا در بیاورند هرچند اقتصاددانانی چون دکتر حسین عبده‌تبریزی شرایط کنونی را به دلیل از دست نرفتن تمام اعتماد مردم به پول ملی، هنوز به معنای ورود به ابَرتورم شناسایی نمی‌کنند، ویدیوهای شهروندی از جهش قیمت‌های اقلام اساسی و نفرین‌های کاربران مستاصل در صفحات اقتصادی و شبکه‌های مجازی تصویر ملموس‌تری از تورم سه‌رقمی در زندگی روزمره می‌دهد. محاسبات تجارت‌نیو

👍21

5 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔻 گزارش‌های غیررسمی از اخراج پرستاران معترض بیمارستان فیاض‌بخش: پرستاران این بیمارستان تنها چند روز پیش‌تر تجمع کرده بودند اصل ۲۰ نوشت: ▫️گزارش‌های غیررسمی از اخراج شماری از پرستاران بیمارستان فیاض‌بخش پس از برگزاری تجمعات اعتراضی حکایت دارد. در واکنش به این گزارش‌ها، وب‌سایت سلامت‌نیوز با انتقاد از برخورد با پرستاران معترض نوشته است که مطالبات صنفی نباید به ناامنی شغلی منجر شود. همچنین در روزهای گذشته، اعضای هیئت

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC122 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📽 دبیر کمیسیون اجتماعی: چند نفر در دولت که از رئیس جمهور هم بیشتر قدرت دارند نمی‌گذارند تبدیل وضعیت عملی شود! 💬 دکتر رضا صدیقی، دبیر کمیسیون اجتماعی و نماینده تبریز، آذرشهر و اسکو در مجلس در گفت‌وگو با پایگاه خبری فیروزه: ▫️دو سال است که پیگیر تبدیل وضعیت نیروهای شرکتی و حذف واسطه‌های پیمانکاری هستیم. رییس جمهور دستور صریح آن را هم داد، معاونش آقای عارف را هم توجیه کردیم که این موضوع برای دولت بار مالی ندارد بلکه

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @davtalaborg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 300,589 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“داوطلب” (@davtalaborg), 2,531 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davtalaborg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.