Channel
@kaaghaz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,775subscribers
+107 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001047340659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaaghaz |
| Created | 19 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaaghaz |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:54 | 5,775 | +8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:59 | 5,767 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 5,762 | +102 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 5,660 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 5,654 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:06 | 5,653 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 5,657 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 5,659 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 5,662 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 5,663 | -8 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 5,671 | +1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 5,670 | -14 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 5,684 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 5,686 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 5,688 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:24 | 5,693 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 5,690 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 5,687 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 5,683 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 5,680 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 November 2025 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 20,700 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
این اطلس شاهنامهس. واقعاً اطلسه. اطلاعات و امکاناتِ مفصّل و متنوع، که بعضیاش درهای تازهایه که باز شده تو اینکار. خواستم کوتاه دربارهش بنویسم ولی گستردهتر از اینه که بشه اینجا ازش نوشت. بازش کنید و ببینید و لذت ببرید و استفاده کنید. با دست مریزاد: https://shahname.mosaic-hub.de/#/ Risua
دموکراتیک کردن اسلام؛ جنبشهای اجتماعی و چرخش پسااسلامگرا (٢٠٠۶)، اثر مهم آصف بیات، نگاه ما را از «ماهیت اسلام» به سوی مبارزههای اجتماعی و سیاسی مسلمانان میبرد: مبارزات زنان، جوانان، دانشجویان، روشنفکران و جنبشهای اجتماعی که در کشاکش با قدرت، به دین و سیاست معناهای تازه میدهند. این کتابِ شاخص در مطالعات خاورمیانه با تمرکز بر ایران و مصر، مفاهیمی چون اسلامگرایی، پسااسلامگرایی، جنبش اجتماعی و دموکراسی را از خلا…
چه خوب است زاده شدن در روزگار فساد؛ چراکه میتوانید، در قیاس با دیگران، به ثمن بخس شهرتی در فضیلت به دست آرید. ▨ مونتنی #نقل_قول @kaaghaz
دستبرد به تناول خدایان قاسم هاشمینژاد
هفتهٔ آخر دی منتشر و توزیع شد، اما حتی نشد جایی بگوییم منتشر شد یا اصلاً دربارهٔ کیست و چیست. بهمن وضع عادی شد (همان عادیای که لابد میدانید)، تا تکان به خودمان بدهیم، باز... این کتاب روایت چهل سال آزگار حبس آلبرت وودفاکس در سلول انفرادی است و عجب شباهتی به روزگار ما دارد. بهار سرلک «آلبرت وودفاکس بیش از چهل سال در زندان به سر برد، اغلب در انفرادی کودکی و نوجوانیاش را در فقر گذراند و در جوانی به پلنگهای سیاه پ…
سنگ مزار مرد بزرگ ایران «سید حسن تقیزاده» به لطف دوستدارانش نو شد. آرام @kaaghaz
دیدم این کتاب هم بالاخره تو زمستون در اومده، با حذفِ عکسِ روجلد. ۴۴۴ صفحه، ۷۶۰ تومن. دمِ امین حقره گرم. risua #خبر_انتشار_کتاب #سانسور @kaaghaz
کاش بازگشت را بهانهای بود یا سوگ شاعر را گشایشی کاش تشنهی شوریده در سرابی نو مینگریست یا توفان در ساعتی سزاوار درمیرسید به تو رشک میبرم، به تو به تو که در سپیدهدمِ شعفْ جوان بودهای و هرگز مجال نیافتهای که به افسونهای نادمیده دل خوش داری و از نقابهای دریده به شگفت آیی چه کنم که باور کنی؟ نه مرا از نواختن پردهای نو پروایی بود و نه نغمهگران را بر لب دریغایی لیک ماه رخ ننمود و هر اختری که پی افگندیم نیک نیا…
ولادیمیر نابوکوف، پدر اَبَرمتن نوشتهٔ مایکل بیروت ترجمهٔ مهرداد اصیل اواخر عید که کمی از تب و تاب اخبار جنگ کم شد، پوشهٔ متنهای کوتاه را باز کردم و دو سه تایی را تفنّنی و محض رفع بیکاری ترجمه کردم؛ از جمله جستاری از مایکل بیروت دربارهٔ رمان آتش رنگباختهٔ ولادیمیر نابوکوف. بیروت طراح گرافیک مشهوری است و جستارها و یادداشتهای خوبی هم در این زمینه مینویسد. او در این متن کوتاه ادعا میکند: «راستش تردید دارم که این …
آنچه در طلبش هستیم اغلب از دست میگریزد، و این بیش از همه در نویدبخشترینِ اوقات رخ میدهد؛ آرزوهامان اغلب آن گاه به بار مینشینند که هیچ امیدی بدانها نیست و یأس بیش از پیش در دلها خانه کرده است. از شکسپیر ▪️ All's well that ends well, act 2, scene 1 #نقل_قول @kaaghaz
بلشویکها به انترناسیونالیسم مارکسیستی پایبند بودند و ناسیونالیسم را آگاهی کاذبی میدانستند. با وجود این از جاذبهاش برای مردم آگاه بودند و میدانستند که اگر در صدد نابودی آن برآیند، گرایش به رشد نشان میدهد. از این رو میکوشیدند مرتکب این اشتباه نشوند. راهبردشان ناسیونالیسمهای غیرروس بود، نهتنها با استفادهٔ اداری از زبانهای بومی و کمک به فرهنگهای ملی، بلکه همچنین با تأسیس ادارات جداگانهٔ منطقهای، که از سطح جمهو…
کاغذ pinned «دل رؤیا گرفته؛ چه کابوسی، مگه نه! نه خورجینی، نه اسبی، نه فانوسی، مگه نه! نه گلدسته، نه محراب، نه ناقوسی، مگه نه! بر این تخت شکنجه، نه طاووسی، مگه نه! در این خواب بدِ بد، من و تو خوب خوبیم. من و تو شرق و غربیم، شمالیم و جنوبیم. چه تصویر غریبی؛ همه بیسر،…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kaaghaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کاغذ” (@kaaghaz), 5,775 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaaghaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.