#جرج_ابراهیم_عبدالله از زیباترین و انقلابیترین جانهای عصرِ ما از ارتباطِ تاریخیِ سرمایهداری و امپریالیسمِ غربی با نسلکشی میگوید و از لزوم سازمانیابی نیروهای انقلابی علیه سرمایه و کشتار. عبدالله از اعضای رهبری جبهه خلق برای آزادی فلسطین (PFLP ) پس از تحملِ ۴۱ سال حبس، در جولای سال ۲۰۲۵ از زندانی در فرانسه آزاد شد. جرج که یک معلم دبیرستان در القبیات واقع در شمال لبنان بود، در سال ۱۹۷۸ به جبهه خلق ملحق شد و یک…

Channel
Blackfishvoice (BFV)
@Blackfishvoice1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,802subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001681427831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Blackfishvoice1 |
| Created | 10 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Blackfishvoice1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 7,802 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 7,804 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 7,806 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 7,814 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 7,812 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.0%
- avg views ÷ 7,802 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,640
- 29 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (25 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,564 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 45s
- Average length
- 1m 58s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
@Blackfishvoice1
#لیبی کماکان آنجاییست که چهرهها و رسانههای برانداز، آنرا نمونهای موفق از «مداخلهی نظامی بشردوستانه» به افکار عمومی ایران میفروشند. برای فروشِ لیبی بهعنوان آرمانشهر فقط به ساقط شدن قذافی اشاره میکنند ولی محال است که از سرنوشت این کشور بعد از ورود ناتو، بمباران و کشتنِ قذافی سخنی بهمیان آورند. اینکه جغرافیای وسیع لیبی در عمل میان چندین دولت، سازمانهای نظامی نیابتی و طوایف و اشرار تقسیم شده یا اینکه کل…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
برشی از «قصیدهی زمین» در هجدمین سالروز درگذشت #محمود_درویش @Blackfishvoice1
#پروپاگاندا #امپریالیسم_بشردوستانه #صنعت_حقوق_بشر @Blackfishvoice1
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
سه روز قبل ویدئویی از یک مصاحبهی « بیل اورایلی» روزنامهنگار نئوفاشیستِ آمریکایی منتشر کردیم که راهِ پیروزی ایالات متحده در تجاوز نظامی به ایران را با خاک یکسان کردنِ تهران برمیشمرد. اینجا «مجید محمدی» دینپژوه_طلبهی سابق و جامعهشناسِ لیبرالِ کنونی، _درحالیکه انگشت در دماغ فرو برده_ نعل به نعلِ صحبتهای اورایلی را بهعنوان پیشنهادِ خود به ترامپ ارائه میکند: «تمام راهها، پلها، خطوط انتقال برق، ایستگاههای م…
https://blackfishvoice.com/?p=1262 @Blackfishvoice1
در روزهای اخیر هم شاهد مسالهی ورود جمعیتِ تهیدستِ مراکشی به جزایر سئوتا و ملیله بودیم و هم کارزار عظیم سیاسی و رسانهای علیه دولتِ پدرو سانچز. گری ویلسون در این متن توضیح میدهد که چگونه یک کارزار هدفمند با پیامهای دروغ و هماهنگی مرزبانی مراکش، دهها هزار کارگر مراکشی را به امید یافتن شغل و اقامت در اسپانیا به قمار بر سر زندگی خود واداشت؛ کارزاری متشکل از سلطنتِ پرو-اسرائیل در مراکش، نئوفاشیستهای کاخ سفید، اتحادی…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Blackfishvoice1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 193,103 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@genderstudies · 5204 postsمطالعات انتقادی معلولیت و اوتیسم
@CriticalDisabilityStudies · 1763 postsUprisings in #Iran
@UprisingForIran · 403 postsجنبش «جلیقه زردها» در فرانسه
@Gilesjaunes · 6642 postsجوانان انقلابی سرخ مهاباد
@LawaniSur · 2332 postsBahar Atish | بهار
@baharatishmusic · 6021 postBilly’s diaries.
@Cododi · 341 postSunt lacrimae rerum
@IfDostoyevskiWasJustHorny · 4281 postزنان و هنر
@womannart · 3261 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@CriticalDisabilityStudies · 1763 postsفمینیسم انقلابی
@genderstudies · 5203 postsUprisings in #Iran
@UprisingForIran · 403 postsاقتصاد سیاسی
@azadivabarabari · 2491 postBahar Atish | بهار
@baharatishmusic · 6021 postBilly’s diaries.
@Cododi · 341 postجنبش «جلیقه زردها» در فرانسه
@Gilesjaunes · 6641 postSunt lacrimae rerum
@IfDostoyevskiWasJustHorny · 4281 postجوانان انقلابی سرخ مهاباد
@LawaniSur · 2331 postReza Nassaji
@RezaNassaji · 3,0591 postزنان و هنر
@womannart · 3261 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blackfishvoice (BFV)” (@Blackfishvoice1), 7,802 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blackfishvoice1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.