Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

حلقه تجریش

@tajrishcircle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,464subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001019066880
TypeChannel
Username@tajrishcircle
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 29 February 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tajrishcircle

Growth

2,4542,4642,4597 August 2026 — 2,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,456 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,464 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,453–2,466 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:032,464+8
7 Aug 2026, 23:142,456+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:312,454no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:232,454first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 2,464 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.871%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,661
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4371.7%
🔥813.3%
👎35.00%
👏23.33%
😁11.67%
😢11.67%
🙏11.67%
🥰11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC313 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PrometheepubPhoto

چگونه ماکیاولی بخوانیم؟ نویسنده: مائوریتسیو ویرولی مترجم: شیرزاد احمدی‌وند انتشارات اسطوره پرومته چاپ اول تابستان ۱۴۰۵ ۱۲۶ صفحه، رقعی، شومیز مجموعه ژانوس کاغذ: بالک روسی قیمت ۵۵۰٫۰۰۰ تومان #نشر_اسطوره_پرومته #کتاب_جدید #ژانوس #ماکیاولی #مائوریتسیو_ویرولی #سیاست #فلسفه_سیاسی #شیرزاد_احمدی‌وند #پرومته https://prometheepub.com https://t.me/Prometheepub https://instagram.com/prometheepub

4😢1

2 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC345 viewsread 7 August 2026

بخشی از متن:در ۳۱ ژوئیه ۱۹۳۲، نازی‌ها در انتخابات ملی آلمان پیروز شدند و درصدد آن برآمدند تا قدرت را به‌دست بگیرند. سیزده سال بعد، بخش‌های وسیعی از جهان به ویرانه بدل گشته بود و میلیون‌ها انسان بی‌گناه جان باخته بودند و زیر آوار مدفون مانده بودند. حدوداً شش میلیون یهودی در اتاق‌های مخصوصِ گاز و در سرتاسر حومه‌های شهر اروپای شرقی هلاک گشتند. کابوس بی‌مانندی بر قلبِ حیاتی اروپا – که تا آن زمان مرکز تمدنِ والا به‌شمار م

2 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC324 viewsread 7 August 2026

✏️نسل‌کشی در سایه‌ی دموکراسی: روان-سیاستِ قَتل‌عام‌های مُدرن ▪️یوهانس لانگ ▪️شهام شریفی 📎متن را در سایت حلقه تجریش مطالعه و یا فایل آن را از اینجا دانلود کنید. #نوشتارهای_دریافتی https://www.tajrishcircle.org/re11055/ https://www.tajrishcircle.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/نسل‌کشی-در-سایه‌ی-دموکراسی.pdf

26 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC465 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pecritiquePhoto

مهرداد وهابی چه‌گونه می‌اندیشد؟ آیا دیدگاه‌های اقتصادی وی در مجموعه‌ی چپ یا اقتصاددانان دگراندیشِ چپ‌گرا جای می‌گیرد؟ ____________ 👈متن کامل

5👎3

26 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC434 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kdialecticPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

26 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC533 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kdialectic

#ترجمه فاشیسم به‌سان یک مفهوم فراتاریخی جستاری از انزو تراورسو ترجمه: امین حصوری ۳ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ یادداشت مترجم: امروزه، با نظر به رشد سریع سازوکارها و گرایش‌های انسان‌ستیز در ساحت‌های داخلی و جهانی، باید درباره‌ی فاشیسم بازاندیشی کرد، تا گامی باشد برای چاره‌اندیشی/پیکار علیه روند تاریخیِ برآمدن آن. ترجمه‌ی پیش رو، فشرده‌ای‌ست از رویکرد انزو تراورسو به تجلی‌های فاشیسم معاصر (یا «پسافاشیسم» در واژگان او)، که خود وی

1

26 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC447 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨دوستان و عزیزان از صبر و حوصله شما متشکریم، مشکلات سایت رفع شده و کم‌کم به روال عادی باز می‌گردیم. صفحه اینستا‌گراممان البته هنوز آغاز به کار نکرده است که آن نیز تا انتهای ماه از نو فعال خواهد شد. حلقه تجریش🚨

6

26 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC444 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بخشی از متن:مارتین لوتر کینگ در سال ۱۹۶۶، پس از بیش از نیم‌قرن تلاش نافرجام برای ایجاد نظام ملی سلامت با پوشش همگانی در ایالات متحده، گفت: «از میان همۀ اشکال نابرابری، بی‌عدالتی در حوزۀ سلامت تکان‌دهنده‌ترین و غیرانسانی‌ترین است.» (۱) پنجاه سال بعد، طرحی با عنوان اوباماکر به اجرا درآمد. این طرح تعداد افراد فاقد بیمه را حدود ۴۰ درصد کاهش داد، اما در مقابل، هزینه‌های درمان برای بسیاری از بیمه‌شدگان پیشین به‌شکل چشمگی

🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC353 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📕نظام سلامت زیر تیغ‌جراحی فصل اول ▪️هاوارد وایتکینز و کارگروه «سلامت در فراسوی سرمایه‌داری» ▪️دکتر ونوشه بحرانی 🖍فصول این کتاب به تدریج در سایت حلقه تجریش منتشر و در پایان به صورت فایلی کامل در اختیار خوانندگان قرار خواهد گرفت. متن فصل اول را در سایت بخوانید و یا فایل آن را از اینجا دانلود کنید: https://www.tajrishcircle.org/bookc1/ https://www.tajrishcircle.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/نظام-سلامت-زیر-تیغ‌جراحی۱.pd

🔥1🙏1

26 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC503 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بخشی از متن:الکساندر لوریا، روان‌عصب‌شناس اهل شوروی، در سال ۱۹۳۱ به کوهپایه‌های آلای سفر کرد. این منطقه کوهستانی بایر میان ازبکستان و قرقیزستان قرار دارد. لوریا می‌خواست با این سفر نظریه‌ خودش را ثابت کند: روندهای ذهنی در اصلِ خود اجتماع‌محور و تاریخی‌اند. نه‌ فقط محتوای فکرمان، بلکه «شیوه‌ی» اندیشیدن ما هم تحت‌تاثیر جامعه‌ای است که در آن زندگی می‌کنیم. او در کوهپایه‌ی آلای جامعه‌ای را پیدا کرد که با جامعه‌ی خودش تفا

2🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC500 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✏️مطالعه عین جادوست ▪️سم کریس ▪️فرزاد عظیم‌بیک 📎متن را درسایت حلقه تجریش مطالعه و یا فایل آن را از اینجا دانلود کنید. tajrishcircle.org/3055/ https://www.tajrishcircle.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/مطالعه-عین-جادوست.pdf

🔥5

7 Jun 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,190 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 همراهان عزیز سرور سایت دچار مشکلاتی است و مشغول برطرف کردن آن هستیم، امیدواریم ظرف فردا یا پس فردا سایت از نو در دسترس قرار گیرد 🚨

15🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tajrishcircle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حلقه تجریش” (@tajrishcircle), 2,464 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tajrishcircle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.