Channel
@nimaclick
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,691subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001005946404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nimaclick |
| Created | 9 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nimaclick |
Recorded in 2019 as “Nima Akbarpour🔥 نیما اکبرپور” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 7,691 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 7,700 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 7,714 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 7,714 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (25 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,450 |
| Reactions total | 187 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
187 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 99 | 52.9% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 13.4% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 9.09% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 6.95% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 5.35% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 3.21% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.535% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اخیراً جشنوارهای رو راهاندازی کردم به نام I'Mpossible Film Festival که ويژه تولیدات تصویری با هوشمصنوعیه. اگر اثری ساختید، در دست ساخته یا تولیدی تصویریه که فکر میکنید جاش توی این جشنواره است، لطفاً ایمیل بفرستید تا Waver Code رو برای معافیت هزینه شرکت در این جشنواره، تقدیم کنم. (hello@impossiblefilmfest.com) همه مراحل از طریق پلتفرم FilmFreeway انجام خواهد شد. لینک ورود: https://filmfreeway.com/impossiblefilmfes…
❤8👍2😁1🙏1
«حسین درواری» میگفت با کوادکوپتر آمدهاند بالای سرش و احتمالش هست او را هم بگیرند. ما میخندیدیم و میگفتیم خیالاتی شده. هر چند در دلمان میدانستیم که آن روزها هیچ چیز بعید نیست. اتاقکی داشت ته حیاط که آنجا بساطش را پهن کرده بود و چند ساعت بعد با چند ماشین ریخته بودند آنجا و برده بودنش. حسین یک نخبه تمام عیار بود و مثلش را ندیده بودم. تمام رفتار شبکه و اختلالاتش را رصد و با نام واقعیاش منتشر کرده بود و این موضوع ا…
👍21❤3💔1
مدل جدید هوش مصنوعی ساخته شرکت چینی مالک تیک تاک، هالیوود را تکان داده است؛ نه فقط به خاطر تواناییهایش، بلکه به دلیل پیامدهایی که میتواند برای صنعت هنر و سرگرمی داشته باشد. سیدنس دو که این روزها نسخه ۲/۵ آن توسط بایت دنس، غول فناوری چینی ارائه شده، میتواند تنها با چند دستور متنی، ویدیوهایی در حد و کیفیت آثار سینمایی تولید کند؛ ویدیوهایی که حتی شامل جلوههای صوتی و گفت و گو نیز هستند. بسیاری از کلیپهایی که گف…
👍4👀3❤1
امیر براتی چگونه از یک هکر جوان در مشهد به شهروندی با هویت تازه در ترکیه تبدیل شد و سرانجام در سفر تفریحی به مونتهنگرو در دام افبیآی افتاد؟ یافتههای اختصاصی ایراناینترنشنال نشان میدهد براتی، مشهور به نام هکری «کینگلت»، از بنیانگذاران دو گروه فعال هکری در ایران بود و منابع مطلع میگویند پس از بازداشت، با وزارت اطلاعات همکاری کرد؛ همکاریای که ظاهرا برای سالها برای او مصونیت امنیتی و قضایی به همراه داشت. گزا…
👌10👍2👏2❤1
حسین کزازی: با ماهی حدودا ۴۸ دلار سرعت ۱۰۰ مگابیت حجم نامحدود در کشور مسلمان و دوست و برادر عراق واقعا خاککک علیاصغر هنرمند: اینترنت استارلینک از روز گذشته در کشور عراق فعال شده است. قیمتها هم جالب است (با دلار ۱۹۳۰۰۰ تومانی). ۹ میلیون برای سرعت ۱۰۰ مگابیتی و دانلود نامحدود. ۱۵ میلیون برای سرعت ۴۰۰ مگابیتی و دانلود نامحدود.
🤬17👍5❤3🫡1😡1
⭕️ هشدار! 🔹 لیستی با عنوان نام، مشخصات، آدرس و شماره ملی بیش از ۴۰۰۰۰ نیروی بسیج و هکر و سپاهی در کانلهای تلگرام درحال پخش شدن است. یکی از فایل های این لیست حاوی بدافزار است. 🔗 https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/f057b5a994e5b021b867600727d1b8041345fe58449630b7173f5664d1620e01/detection 🔹 بدافزار یک نسخه از action1 را روی سیستم قربانی نصب و آن را به پنل خود اضافه میکند. 🆔 @Webamoozir
👍8❤2🔥1🫡1
گزارش نظرسنجی گمان درباره «نگرش ایرانیان به جنگ ۱۲ روزه» برای اطلاع عموم منتشر شد. این گزارش در بخشهای مختلف به بررسی دیدگاهها و احساسات ایرانیان درباره جنگ ۱۲ روزه، همچنین ارزیابی نگرش مردم نسبت به سیاستهای خارجی و نظامی حکومت میپردازد. متن کامل گزارش (به فارسی) در اینجا پیوست شده است. همچنین این گزارش را به فارسی و انگلیسی میتوانید از روی سایت گمان هم دریافت کنید. چکیده گزارش و نمودارهای مربوط به بخشهای مخ…
👎13👍6❤4🤣1
🎥 حامد بیدی، کنشگر حق اینترنت: فیلترینگ یکی از سه دلیل اصلی مهاجرت است 📹 ویدیوی کامل این گفتوگو را به زودی در کانال یوتیوب کافه خبر خواهید دید 📌 متن کامل گزارش میزگرد فیلترینگ به میزبانی نگار علی اینجاست: khabaronline.ir/xq7kc @KhabarOnline_ir | Khabaronline.ir
👍23🤣5😢2🥱1
امیررضا قویدل: این پیامک سند تو آل، چند پیام میتونه داشته باشه: ۱- استارلینک از تریاک ممنوع تر است ۲- قرار است اینترنت قطع شود ۳- باید با اینترنت اپراتورهای داخلی تحت نظارت باشید ۴- مردم فوج فوج در حال گرویدن به استارلینک هستند ۵- اطلاع رسانی پیامکی ار رسانه های جمعی کارایی بهتری داره پست دوم: پیامک هشدارآمیز میلیونی استارلینک درحالی ارسال شد که مطابق نظرسنجی ایسپا بیشتر مردم اصلا استارلینک را نمی شناسند! بیشتر از ن…
👍21❤1
هوش مصنوعی چه امکانها و خطرهای تازهای برای آیندهی ما دارد؟ چه تأثیری بر اقتصاد، مشاغل، تحصیل، و حکومتداری خواهد داشت؟ آیا عاملیت ما و نگاهمان به زندگی متحول خواهد شد؟ آیا تشخیص واقعیت دشوارتر یا آسانتر میشود؟ آیا ممکن است که کنترل هوش مصنوعی از دست بشر خارج شود؟ در این فیلم، ماهو که خودش ساختهی هوش مصنوعیست برای یافتن پاسخ به این سؤالها به سراغ نیکا حقطلب استاد مهندسی برق و علوم کامپیوتر دانشگاه کالیفرنیا …
👍7❤2🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @nimaclick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 114,510 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nima Akbarpour🔥 نیما” (@nimaclick), 7,691 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nimaclick.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.