11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,390–19,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 17:13
19,412
-18
14 Aug 2026, 22:48
19,430
-31
13 Aug 2026, 12:06
19,461
-12
12 Aug 2026, 11:56
19,473
-16
11 Aug 2026, 11:07
19,489
-11
10 Aug 2026, 10:58
19,500
-14
9 Aug 2026, 12:04
19,514
-11
8 Aug 2026, 12:47
19,525
-14
7 Aug 2026, 11:21
19,539
-14
6 Aug 2026, 12:00
19,553
-3
6 Aug 2026, 08:17
19,556
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
994
Videos
602
Links
522
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
27m 26s
Average length
3m 03s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,148 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,042
61.2%
👍
3,952
30.1%
😢
573
4.36%
👏
198
1.51%
🤬
161
1.22%
🔥
134
1.02%
🤔
67
0.51%
🤯
10
0.076%
🥰
7
0.053%
😱
4
0.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 6 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3,715
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 17 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,640
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hosseinronaghi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 6 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
خبرگزاری حکومتی تسنیم و برخی کانالهای وابسته به حکومت، با بیان اتهامات واهی، تصویری ساختگی را با عنوان تلگرام «حسین رونقی» منتشر کردهاند.
این اتهام کاملاً کذب و بیشرمانه در حالی مطرح شده است که حسین رونقی سالهاست بر روی خط ذکر شده هیچ اکانتی در تلگرام ندارد.
همچنین به دلیل ملاحظات امنیتی، ایشان در حال حاضر هیچ دسترسی مستقیمی به اکانتهای خود در شبکههای اجتماعی ندارد و صفحات مربوطه توسط ادمین اداره میشود.
…
صدای بازداشتشدگان در ایران نباید خاموش بماند.
در این روزهای دشوار که فشار و خفقان گسترده بر جامعه حاکم است، کسانی که در بازداشت و زندان به سر میبرند، با رنجها و فشارهای سنگینتری روبهرو هستند.
ما باید آگاهانه ایستادگی کنیم و بازداشتشدگان را فراموش نکنیم.
جامعهای که برای آزادی ایستاده است، فرزندان خود را تنها نخواهد گذاشت.
زندانیان سیاسی و عقیدتی باید آزاد شوند.
@Hosseinronaghi
ترانه جدید مهدی یراحی
من از آشوئیتس شب انتقال
من از قتلگاه جوونی میام
من از آخر یادگار امام
من از اول سرنگونی میام
زمستان خونبار ۱۴۰۴
#Auschwitz
#آشوئیتس
#حسین_شنبهزاده
@Hosseinronaghi
«قلم در دست گرفتیم تا بیانیهای در محکومیت جنایات و کشتار اخیر بنویسیم، اما از فرط استیصال کلام در برابر توحش، قلم بر زمین نهادیم.
جایی که حقیقت سلاخی میشود، سخن به بیراهه نمیفرستیم.
ما را دیگر با شما، زبان گفتوگو نیست.»
مجمع انجمنهای علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف.
@Hosseinronaghi
عملکرد کادر درمانی در روزهای خونین دی ۱۴۰۴ از پرافتخارترین مقاطع تاریخ این حرفه در ایران معاصر است. طیف عظیمی از پزشکان، پرستاران، بهیاران، پرسنل اداری و دیگران، در ابعادی باورنکردنی به یاری مجروحانی شتافتند که تعداد آنها، بهمراتب فراتر از مجموعه امکانات درمانی هر کشوری بود. البته، گزارش هایی هم از عملکرد نامطلوب یا حتی همدستی برخی از افراد کادر درمانی با نهادهای سرکوب وجود داشته است. ولی تعداد آنها، در مقایسه با …
امیر خادم، راوی پادکست ماجرای مشروطه: «نه در تاریخ جمهوری اسلامی، نه حتی در تاریخ مدرن ایران، بلکه در سراسر تاریخ کشور عزیزمان ایران، هیچگاه چنین حجمی از کشتار مردم بیسلاح، در زمانهٔ صلح، در بازهای چنین کوتاه و در گسترهای جغرافیایی به این وسعت، سابقه نداشته است.
زخمی که در دیماه ۱۴۰۴ بر پیکر کشور ما زده شد، زخمی تاریخی است؛ زخمی که التیام آن نه کار یک روز و دو روز است، و نه حتی کار یک نسل یا دو نسل.»
@Hosseinro…
آنچه در ایران رخ داد، جنایت علیه بشریت است. معترضان میهندوست و آزادیخواه، که در پی حق زندگی و آزادی بودند، بهطور سازمانیافته قتلعام شدند. شمار بسیاری زخمی شدند، بینایی خود را از دست دادند یا دچار قطع عضو شدند. بسیاری دیگر یا ناپدید شدهاند یا در بازداشت بهسر میبرند و در انتظار احکام سنگین هستند. ما شاهد یکی از تاریکترین برهههای تاریخ معاصر ایران هستیم.
ما سوگوار هموطنان، دوستان و عزیزانی هستیم که در این…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hosseinronaghi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 165,610 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hosseinronaghi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hossrinronaghi named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
حافظه تاریخی @hafezeye_tarikhi · 139,464 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
FactNameh | فکتنامه @factnameh · 111,813 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Reza Pahlavi | رضا پهلوی @OfficialRezaPahlavi · 345,186 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
تاریخاندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی @tarikhandishi · 112,057 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hossein Ronaghi - حسین رونقی” (@hosseinronaghi), 19,412 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hosseinronaghi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
