Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة فقه الحنابلة

Channel

قناة فقه الحنابلة

@hnabla1444

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,832subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847414343
TypeChannel
Username@hnabla1444
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hnabla1444

Growth

10,79410,83510,814.56 August 2026 — 10,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,804 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,813 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,816 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,819 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,821 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,825 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,832 subscribers10,8326 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,788–10,841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:1810,832-3
15 Aug 2026, 17:5510,835+10
14 Aug 2026, 07:0410,825+4
13 Aug 2026, 02:2510,821+2
12 Aug 2026, 05:5410,819+3
11 Aug 2026, 08:1310,816+3
10 Aug 2026, 08:2010,813+9
9 Aug 2026, 08:3110,804+6
8 Aug 2026, 05:1810,798+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:0410,795+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:3210,794first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.04%
avg views ÷ 10,832 subscribers
Avg views / post
871
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.342%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held25 (8 May 202615 August 2026)
Views total9,584
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍86100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC292 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٩/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الصلاة #شروط_الصلاة جاء في الروض المربع: ونصُّ أحمدَ فيمن صلَّى ركعةً مِن فريضةٍ منفردًا، ثم حَضَر الإمامُ وأقيمت الصلاةُ: (يقطعُ صلاتَه، ويدخلُ معهم) (٢)، يَتخرَّجُ منه: قطعُ النافلةِ بحضورِ الجماعةِ بطريقِ الأَوْلى.. كيف نوفق بين هذه العبارة مع قوله في باب صلاة الجماعة: «(فَإِنْ) أقيمت و (كَانَ) يصلِّي (فِي نَافِلَةٍ؛ أَتَمَّهَا) خفيفةً، (إِلَّا أَنْ يَخْشَى فَوَاتَ الجَمَاعَةِ فَيَقْط

👍2

14 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC506 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٨/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة جاء في الروض المربع: "(أَوْ كَانَ آخِرَ غَسْلَةٍ زَالَتِ النَّجَاسَةُ بِهَا) وانفصَلَ غيرَ متغيِّرٍ؛ (فَطَاهِرٌ)؛ لأنَّ المنفصِلَ بعضُ المتَّصلِ، والمتَّصلُ طاهرٌ." لو أن الإنسان قام بإزالة النجاسة التي على ثوبه فغسله سبع مرات وزالت النجاسة بغسلة ثالثة وكان ما ينفصل من غسلة رابعة وإلى غسلة سابعة ماء غير متغير فيكون حكم هذا الماء المنفصل غير المتغير طاهرا هذا ما قلت صحيح؟ أم نحكم ب

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC546 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٧/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة #الغسل جاء في الروض المربع: "ويَرتفعُ حَدَثٌ قَبلَ زَوالِ حُكْمِ خَبَثٍ." هل هذا يعني أن المرء إذا كان ببدنه نجاسة فغسل عينها ٤ غسلات وزال عينها، ثم اغتسل مرة واحدة، سيرتفع حدثه مع بقاء حكم الخبث ولزوم غسل موضعه إلى تمام السبع غسلات؟ و إن كان كذلك، فهل تعتبر غسلة الغُسل؟ فيكون بقي له غسلتان، أم لا تعتبر فيكون بقي له ثلاث لتمام السبع؟ أجاب الشيخ أحمد الجماز/ الحمدُ للهِ والصَّلاة

👍1

13 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC600 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

= ويُفْهَمُ منهُ: أنَّه يُمكِنُ بالاغْتِسَالِ رَفْعُ الحَدَثِ وإِزَالَةُ النَّجَاسَةِ مَعًا، في حَالِ تَوَافَقَ الغُسْلُ مَعَ الغَسْلَةِ الأَخِيرَةِ الَّتِي طَهَّرَتِ المَحَلَّ، فدخَلَتْ طهارَةُ النَّجاسَةِ في طَهَارَةِ الحَدَثِ حِينَئِذٍ، واحتُسِبَ بذَلِكَ الغُسْلِ لإِتمَامِ العَدَدِ. وصُورَةُ ذَلِكَ: مَا إذَا بَقِيَ علَيهِ مِنَ السَّبعِ الغَسَلَاتِ - مَعَ زَوَالِ عَينِ النَّجَاسَةِ - غَسْلَةٌ وَاحِدَةٌ، فاغتَسَلَ ل

👍2

13 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC613 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٦/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_النكاح #المحرمات_في_النكاح جاء في الروض المربع: ":( (وللحر نكاح أمة أبيه) لأنه لا ملك للابن فيها، ولا شبهة ملك (دون) نكاح (أمة ابنه) فلا يصح نكاحه أمة ابنه، لأن الأب له التملك من مال ولده كما تقدم.(وليس للحرة نكاح عبد ولدها) لأنه ملك زوجها أو بعضه لا نفسخ النكاح ) لأنه لو ملك زوجها أو بعضه لانفسخ النكاحا" أشكل علي أنه في صورة زواج الأب بجارية ابنه منعها لوجود شبهة ملك فللأب تملك مال ول

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٥/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة جاء في الروض المربع: "(أَوْ كَانَ آخِرَ غَسْلَةٍ زَالَتِ النَّجَاسَةُ بِهَا) وانفصَلَ غيرَ متغيِّرٍ؛ (فَطَاهِرٌ)؛ لأنَّ المنفصِلَ بعضُ المتَّصلِ، والمتَّصلُ طاهرٌ." لو أن الإنسان قام بإزالة النجاسة التي على ثوبه فغسله سبع مرات وزالت النجاسة بغسلة ثالثة وكان ما ينفصل من غسلة رابعة وإلى غسلة سابعة ماء غير متغير فيكون حكم هذا الماء المنفصل غير المتغير طاهرا هذا ما قلت صحيح؟ أم نحكم ب

30 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٤/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة #الحيض جاء في الروض المربع: "والطُّهرُ زَمَنَ حيضٍ: خُلوصُ النَّقاءِ، بألا تتغيَّرَ معه قطنةٌ احْتَشَت بها. ولا يُكره وطؤها زمنَه إنِ اغتسلت." وَمَنْ رَأَتْ يَوْمًا) أو أقلَّ أو أكثرَ (دَمًا، وَيوَمًا) أو أقلَّ أو أكثرَ (نقَاءً؛ فَالدَّمُ حَيْضٌ) حيثُ بلَغَ مجموعُه أقلَّ الحيضِ، (وَالنَّقَاءُ طُهْرٌ)، تغتسلُ فيه، وتصومُ وتصلي، ويُكره وطؤها فيه كيف نوفق بين عبارتي الشيخ منصور رحمه

30 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٣/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة جاء في الروض المربع: "(وَلَا يَرْفَعُ حَدَثَ رَجُلٍ) وخُنثى (طَهُورٌ يَسِيرٌ) دونَ القُلتين، (خَلَتْ بِهِ) كخَلوةِ نكاحٍ (امْرَأَةٌ) مكلفةٌ ولو كافرةٌ، (لِطَهَارَةٍ كَامِلَةٍ عَنْ حَدَثٍ)" هل يفهم من العبارة "كخلوة نكاح" أنه لا يشترط استعمال الماء؟ وكيف نجمع بينها وبين عبارة "لطهارة كاملة" وهل هذا يعلم بسؤال منها عن نيتها؟ أجاب الشيخ د. عبدالرحيم مشطا/ لا يفهم من العبارة عدم اش

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC993 viewsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٢/ #أخصر_المختصرات : #كتاب_الجهاد جاء في أخصر المختصرات: "ثمَّ يقسم الْبَاقِي بَين من شهد الْوَقْعَة للراجل سهم وللفارس على فرس عَرَبِيّ ثَلَاثَة وعَلى غَيره اثْنَان وَيقسم لحر مُسلم ويرضخ لغَيرهم" ما حكم الرضخ على المذهب(كل ما اطلعت عليه من كتب المذهب يذكره مبهمًا) الجواب: الذي يظهر في هذه المسألة أن الأصل فيها الجواز بحسب ما يراه الإمام، والتصرف فيها من قبل الإمام منوط بالمصلحة وجوداً وعدماً وحكم التصرف وفق ا

29 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC994 viewsread 15 August 2026

١١٤١/ #الروض_المربع: #كتاب_الطهارة #فروض_الوضوء_وصفته جاء في الروض المربع: "و ان انغمس ناويا في ماء و خرج مرتبا اجزأه و إلا فلا" ان انغمس الشخص في حوض مثلا به ماء قليل اليس بمجرد ان يلمس الوجه الماء يصبح الماء مستعملا كالحدث الأكبر ولدي استشكالين في فهم العلة حتى في الحدث الأكبر حيث كيف للماء - ان يتحول فورا لمستعمل بمجرد اللمس - والمتصل يأخذ نفس حكمه اليس لابد من توفر الشرطين قليل و انفصال، فهو لم ينفصل أجاب

26 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,240 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٤٠/ #كشاف_القناع #كتاب_الصلاة #صلاة_أهل_الأعذار جاء في كشاف القناع: "(أو) نوى إقامة (أكثر من عشرين صلاة) أتم لحديث جابر وابن عباس، أن النَّبيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم "قدم مكة صبيحة رابعة ذي الحجة، فأقام بها الرابع، والخامس، والسادس، والسابع، وصلى الصبح في اليوم الثامن، ثم خرج إلى منى، وكان يقصر الصلاة في هذه الأيام" وقد أجمع على إقامتها.وقال أنس: "أقمنا بمكة عشرًا نقصر الصلاة" متفق عليه.قال الأثرم: سمعت أبا عبد الله

👍6

12 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,080 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

١١٣٩/ #الآداب_الشرعية_والمنح_المرعية: #سنة_المصافحة جاء في الآداب الشرعية والمنح المرعية: "وَتُبَاحُ الْمُعَانَقَةُ وَتَقْبِيلُ الْيَدِ وَالرَّأْسِ تَدَيُّنًا وَإِكْرَامًا وَاحْتِرَامًا مَعَ أَمْنِ الشَّهْوَةِ، وَظَاهِرُ هَذَا عَدَمُ إبَاحَتِهِ لِأَمْرِ الدُّنْيَا، وَاخْتَارَهُ بَعْضُ الشَّافِعِيَّةِ، وَالْكَرَاهَةُ أَوْلَى. وَكَذَا عِنْدَ الشَّافِعِيَّةِ تَقْبِيلُ رِجْلِهِ. وَقَالَ الْمَرُّوذِيُّ سَأَلْت أَبَا عَبْ

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @hnabla1444. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,962 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tamayyuz - تميُّز
@TamayyuzCenter · 114,421
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
قناة مؤسسة الدرر السنية
@dorarnet_telegram · 108,365
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
هندسة النحو -هيثم الوزير
@ayman0789459028 · 114,484
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
أخبار السعودية
@saudinews50 · 167,942
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
المرشد للقدرات
@qudrat_free · 289,574
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
وظائف | وظيفة.كوم
@wadhefadotcom · 265,931
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة فقه الحنابلة” (@hnabla1444), 10,832 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hnabla1444.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.