Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Norlin Games

@NorlinGames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225352653
TypeChannel
Username@NorlinGames
DescriptionStuff I do in Unreal Engine dm: @norlin_ru discuss: @NorlinGamesChat
Created18 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/NorlinGames

Growth

2486 Aug 2026, 23:34 — 248 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:30 — 248 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:347 Aug 2026, 02:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:30248no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:34248first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
228
Videos
72
Links
408

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52561920020258650521219.4%
🤡1219.4%
🔥1117.7%
custom 5389054805282930291812.9%
711.3%
custom 543841277131202539646.45%
23.23%
👀23.23%
custom 534599971664560981111.61%
❤‍🔥11.61%
🤣11.61%
🤯11.61%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 10:30 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

первый прототип конструктора заклинаний https://norlin.games/magic/index.html #прототип #магия #protototype #magic #playtest

23 Apr 2026, 06:48 UTC304 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWGWQ4CwSRY У вас сложности закодить движения персонажа? Аудитория хейтит вас за ИИ-слоп? Никто не хочет идти к вам в команду? А тут автор Wordless Forest пошёл один в лес и 40 дней снимал себя на камеры, чтоб из видео собрать адвенчуру-выживалку с вариативными концовками, зависящими от выборов игрока. Релиз летом: https://store.steampowered.com/app/3978240/Wordless_Forest/ #indie

4 Apr 2026, 06:00 UTC375 viewsread 7 August 2026

Реверс-инжиниринг Силксонг https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC9bIelizlw #gamedev #silksong #research

25 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC292 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fourier_series

Сейчас будет весёлая история, как компьютерные игры помогают людям. Не только ультранасилием, в смысле. Где-то в 2004 году нашли, что геймеры могут отслеживать больше движущихся объектов одновременно — или быстрее находить цель среди множества отвлекающих факторов. Тут этот момент исследовали. Оказалось, от игр действительно дофига пользы. Есть такой эффект скученности. Представьте, что вы смотрите на одну букву А

🔥3🤡1

16 Mar 2026, 08:40 UTC264 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Офигеть, там официально собираются Firefly делать! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXRvEheY5cA #BringBackFirefly #news

🔥1🤡1custom 53459997166456098111

18 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC332 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А там у Chefs Arena, оказывается, демка доступна! https://store.steampowered.com/app/2951600/Chefs_Arena/

🤡1

16 Jan 2026, 08:22 UTC470 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Battlefielda 6 poproszę

custom 525619200202586505251🤡1

3 Jan 2026, 17:19 UTC372 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ufnadev

Если что, это не про политику. Это про тот странный мир, где взрослый политический дядька из телевизора срется в комментах (и по ощущегиям - проигрывает эту инфовойну) и даже личке с Апанасиком. И нет, это не дтф и даже не панорама! @Suvitruf , мое почтение, запасы попкорна уничтожены в момент 🍿 https://x.com/Suvitruf/status/2007430202800877655

5🤡1

22 Dec 2025, 13:33 UTC464 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Анализ 10000 игр из Стима на основе скриншотов и хедер-картинок https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyhVJUJrvoM #industry #steam #research #data

🤡1

19 Dec 2025, 12:40 UTC315 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fourier_series

В Аргентине, Финляндии, Израиле, Японии и США решили выяснить, почему всё больше людей сознательно избегают новостей. Что приятно, тут не опрос, а 488 глубинных интервью, группы от 18 до пенсионеров, средний возраст 40 лет. — В США и Финляндии: многие участники говорили, что устали от новостей про Трампа. В Финляндии вторая причина — куча новостей с телефонов. Постоянный поток уведомлений и обновлений приводит к же

1custom 52561920020258650521

18 Dec 2025, 09:29 UTC240 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#offtopic #irl

🤡21❤‍🔥1🤯1custom 54384127713120253961

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NorlinGames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 857,170 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Norlin Games” (@NorlinGames), 248 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NorlinGames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.