Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for artjockey

Channel

artjockey

@artjockey

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

80,844subscribers

+219 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001842181039
TypeChannel
Username@artjockey
DescriptionПишу про войны, политику, историю. https://t.me/artjockey_lite — второй канал для небольших тематических заметок. Прямая связь: https://t.me/artjockey_bot Подписка на платный канал: https://t.me/artjockeyp_bot https://boosty.to/artjockey
Created10 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artjockey

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

66,100 average views per post against 80,844 subscribers — an engagement rate of 81.8%. Across the 8,196 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,972 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.99% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (18 July 2026 17 August 2026)
Posts measured26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,719,800
Mature posts only81.8% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers80,844 measured 16 August 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,196 channels · p10 2.35% · p25 4.99% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.0% · p90 36.8%
Position in cohort99.329th percentile · 7.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.04% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 17 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

80,62580,84480,734.56 August 2026 — 80,625 subscribers6 August 2026 — 80,625 subscribers6 August 2026 — 80,635 subscribers7 August 2026 — 80,641 subscribers8 August 2026 — 80,677 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,753 subscribers11 August 2026 — 80,780 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,788 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80,792 subscribers15 August 2026 — 80,804 subscribers16 August 2026 — 80,844 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net +219. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,592–80,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:4780,844+40
15 Aug 2026, 15:5880,804+12
14 Aug 2026, 01:0480,792+4
12 Aug 2026, 16:5580,788+8
11 Aug 2026, 18:3780,780+27
10 Aug 2026, 17:0080,753+68
9 Aug 2026, 17:0480,685+8
8 Aug 2026, 19:2680,677+36
7 Aug 2026, 18:1380,641+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:5880,635+10
6 Aug 2026, 02:4580,625no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:3880,625first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.8%
avg views ÷ 80,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
66,100
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held26 (31 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total1,719,800
Reactions total30,570
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,110
Videos
413
Links
1,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28,470 reactions across 24 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 586643004788729975428,470100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,570reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 26 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
854
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artjockey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈42,800 views1,030 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026

Опять обострилась дискуссия о мобилизации, драйвером которой сейчас выступает Зеленский. На неделе он сообщил, что в России планируют мобилизовать несколько сотен тысяч человек сразу после выборов, а затем ещё несколько сотен тысяч в следующем году. Однако есть и альтернативное мнение: The Guardian со ссылкой на западного чиновника сообщил, что Путин не планирует объявлять мобилизацию в этом году, вместо этого в Крем

custom 58664300478872997541,030

15 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈47,000 views1,050 reactions9 Starsread 17 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 58664300478872997541,050

14 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈47,900 views899 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

«Медиазона» доработала свою инфографику о российских потерях. Поводом стал неверный анализ их данных от Петра Турчина, о котором я рассказывал здесь: https://t.me/artjockey/3296 Суть в том, что если смотреть на график потерь не зная контекста, может показаться, что в 2026 году потери ВС РФ значительно снизились. На этом утверждении Турчин и основывал своё новое исследование. Однако с учётом контекста, ситуация меняе

custom 5866430047887299754899

14 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈86,100 views1,000 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026

Зерновой вопрос — это чувствительная политическая тема, потому что, в отличие от нефти, зерно сложнее заместить и ещё сложнее сократить его потребление. Было понятно, что на обе стороны, как на Россию, так и на Украину, начнётся давление, чтобы удары прекратились и поставки зерна возобновились. Первую попытку такого давления мы увидели на выходных, когда Турция заблокировала проход торговых кораблей в Чёрное море че

custom 58664300478872997541,000

13 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC≈88,200 views1,100 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026

Даже в Москве, не говоря о регионах, вновь начал чувствоваться дефицит бензина. Сегодня в Астраханской области АЗС перешли на временный график работы и ограничили продажу топлива 40 литрами в руки, ранее бензин пропал в Сочи, а местная власть даже призывала отказаться от использования автомобилей, в Оренбургской области ввели систему «чет-нечет» и ограничения не более 30 литров бензина. Связано это с возобновлением

custom 58664300478872997541,100

13 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈51,900 views1,410 reactions68 Starsread 17 August 2026

Когда меня просят написать что-то про выборы, я говорю, что сделаю это за 1-2 недели до выборов, история с отменой «Яблоко» наглядно показала, почему: давайте посмотрим, кто вообще до выборов доживёт во всех смыслах. Но можно порассуждать, а что вообще может произойти за оставшееся время. А история «Яблока» показала, что в обществе есть очень большой запрос на мирную повестку. Косвенно это видно даже по разрешённой,

custom 58664300478872997541,410

12 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈55,400 views1,300 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

Параллельно реализации украинской стратегии дальних ударов, стал меняться и подход России, пока сложно сказать, появилась ли единая стратегия, но точно изменился подход к выбору целей. Возможно, причиной стала смена командующего ВКС на Чайко, того самого, который чудом выжил в ресторане. Ротация произошла совсем недавно, в мае, так что, возможно, мы сейчас и видим изменения, инициированные новым командующим. В конце

custom 58664300478872997541,300

12 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈56,400 views1,100 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

После уничтожения РЭБа, прикрывающего Геленджик и Новороссийск, ВСУ нанесли массированный удар по порту. Это был не просто обстрел, а целенаправленная операция, ВСУ направили на него все доступные ресурсы. Зеленский заявил, что применялись реактивные БПЛА «Паляница» и «Барс», ракеты «Нептун» и БЭКи, а целью стали позиции ПВО, причалы и инфраструктура порта. По карте пожаров видно, что горело в районе терминала Шесх

custom 58664300478872997541,100

11 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈61,000 views1,810 reactions854 Starsread 17 August 2026

«Яблоко» сняли. После начала судебного процесса это было ожидаемо, неожиданностью во всей этой ситуации является, скорее, сам факт их изначального допуска на выборы, так что вся эта история — очередное отражение того, что левая рука власти не знает, что делает правая, они действуют вразнобой. Хайп вокруг партии связан с тем, что это единственная легальная оппозиционная партия, которая, впрочем, имеет контакты и дого

custom 58664300478872997541,810

10 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈75,000 views1,130 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026

Между Украиной и Россией развернулась «зерновая война», в ходе которой обе стороны блокируют друг другу экспорт. Если ничего не поменяется, то мир вскоре может столкнуться с кризисом поставок зерна и включится дипломатия, а пока все спорят, кто же теряет больше. Своё мнение я уже озвучивал, могу его повторить, чтобы все разочаровавшиеся уже на этом моменте промотали дальше и не тратили своё и потом моё время: теряет

custom 58664300478872997541,130

9 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈117,000 views1,100 reactions8 Starsread 17 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 58664300478872997541,100

8 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈60,200 views1,210 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026

Собянин дал одно из «предвыборных интервью» главе ТАСС, где звучали даже некоторые острые вопросы. Например у мэра столицы спросили про атаки БПЛА и о том, какие меры предпринимаются для защиты. Но главная реплика из всего общения касалась экономики: Мы постоянно слышим разговоры о том, что надо мобилизовать всю экономику, на войну развернуть и так далее. Но современная экономика выстроена по-другому. Если не будет с

custom 58664300478872997541,210

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @artjockey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,039 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Димитриев
@russ_orientalist · 129,417
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Кримсон Дайджест
@crimsondigest · 140,079
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“artjockey” (@artjockey), 80,844 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artjockey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.