Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net +599. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,275–21,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 20:42
21,132
-59
18 Sept 2026, 19:58
21,191
-10
16 Sept 2026, 11:58
21,201
-18
14 Sept 2026, 18:56
21,219
-26
13 Sept 2026, 08:21
21,245
-20
11 Sept 2026, 08:39
21,265
+6
8 Sept 2026, 15:00
21,259
-45
5 Sept 2026, 10:38
21,304
-11
3 Sept 2026, 12:39
21,315
-14
2 Sept 2026, 07:43
21,329
-4
1 Sept 2026, 09:24
21,333
-9
31 Aug 2026, 11:07
21,342
-5
30 Aug 2026, 09:34
21,347
-1
29 Aug 2026, 12:25
21,348
-8
28 Aug 2026, 13:46
21,356
-19
27 Aug 2026, 10:16
21,375
-8
26 Aug 2026, 10:24
21,383
-14
25 Aug 2026, 12:12
21,397
-5
24 Aug 2026, 14:02
21,402
-31
22 Aug 2026, 21:53
21,433
first reading
Engagement
578 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.17%
avg views ÷ 21,132 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
87 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 578 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 87 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
578 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
95,021
Reactions total
686
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52m 49s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,496 reactions across 442 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,243
72.1%
custom 5372886001465170842
1,253
27.9%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 477 of the 578 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,596 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 578 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 577 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skvir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 578 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.173%
1 of 578 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
839
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,040
over 576 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 578 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Один из уморительных сюжетов последних дней — коммуникация между оргами концерта Канье и Газпром-ареной. Причем даже не сам обмен сообщениями в тг-каналах сомнительной официальности, а их стиль.
Пока сммщик стадиона, видимо чей-то племянник или любовница, хуячит узнаваемым слогом поддержки наркошопа (смесь официоза с бычкой), агентство-организатор отвечает контрагенту (и сотне тысяч человек, купивших билеты) букваль…
Самый милый форс за последнее время — женщина стала популярной в тредс благодаря двум постам, в которых пишет о том, что хочет удалить свой аккаунт…максимально понимаю её состояние
В этом году Йе заработал на отмене концертов 25 миллионов долларов, пишет Daily Mail. Все дело в одном пункте контракта: половина гонорара выплачивается авансом, даже если шоу по итогу не состоится. Без этого организаторам запрещено начинать продажу билетов, а команда Копатыча не выкатит анонс концерта. Сейчас самой прибыльной отменой является Лондон — 7,5 миллиона, как с куста. У Питера есть все шансы побить рекорд
Волосы это не только ценный мех, но и цистеин для ваших багетов
Посещая парикмахерскую я думаю про китайский биотех прошлых лет.
Исторически в Китае человеческие волосы использовали как одно из видов кератинового сырья для получения цистеина. Человеческие волосы примерно на 90% состоят из кератиновых белков. Кератины волос богат цистеиновыми остатками, значительная часть которых соединена дисульфидными связями и пр…
В интернете второй день не стихают споры по поводу вчерашнего «Дня знаний». Из-за чего разразились словесные баталии? Из-за того, что некоторые мамаши пришли в школу в мини-юбочках, кружевных корсетах, чулках на босу пипу и прочих атрибутах из магазина для взрослых мальчиков. Аудитория разделилась на две части - одни считают школьную линейку неподходящим местом для слишком откровенных модных образов, вторые считают п…
вот че щас скинули — вообще не люблю парк, особенно нынешний, там просто 1666 градусов пятерной декейд на бар уже делают, я даже посчитать не успеваю в голове обороты, но охуенно пиздец, теперь в течение 1-3 лет жду фэйки кэш ролл в стриту)
https://youtube.com/shorts/abciAsiR1yI?is=pf6XIBMLbhafThXk
Showing the 12 most recent of 578 posts we hold for @skvir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 54 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы) @bogemasranaya · 30,632#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ГОРИ ЯСНО @gori_yasno · 21,860 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
ТУД @TydOriginal11 · 24,428 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 September 2026
Тупа кволити контент @skazochnoebalie · 22,758 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
CONWAY @conway671games · 44,747 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
между приговым и курехиным @betweenprigov · 20,722 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
Психоделия по-советски @sovietunder · 24,973 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
kontrkult @kontrkult · 21,458 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
DAILY DVIZH в МСК СПБ - твой гайд по клубам, фестивалям и выставкам @dailydvizh · 21,300 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
Бирвария @beervaria · 20,800 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Андерграунд - развлекательный телеграм канал @underground_youtube · 21,795 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
Первый ночной @napervom · 45,261 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Прогревочная @progrevg1 · 22,607 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
Мужчина, вы куда? @crisisman · 44,962 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
ты сегодня такой пепперштейн @ppstein · 22,804 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
MOSCOW XXI @moskva_000 · 23,808 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ @svtvnews · 113,005 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Парнасский пересмешник @captainpaleo · 52,123 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
DANCE W!TH US | Вечеринки СПб, тусовки Питера, ночные клубы Петербурга @dancewithus · 20,953 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 September 2026
Россия на игле @RNIGL · 35,680 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Леонардо Ди Ванче” (@skvir), 21,132 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skvir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
