3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,448–2,450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:28
2,448
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:13
2,449
-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:52
2,450
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 2,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,475
Reactions total
117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
117 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
63
53.8%
👍
20
17.1%
❤🔥
8
6.84%
🤣
8
6.84%
🙏
5
4.27%
🔥
4
3.42%
🎉
3
2.56%
👏
3
2.56%
👌
2
1.71%
😴
1
0.855%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы точно успели отдохнуть?
Если нет, - успевайте насладиться летними выходными. В Петербурге лето подкралось в августе. А у вас как погода?
Самый простой способ порелаксировать: завалиться на плед на природе и почитать запоем как в детстве новую или любимую художественную книжку. Собрали для вас рекомендации сотрудников института.
Коллеги, поделитесь любыми книжками в комментариях. Каждый раз забираем что-то себе …
Когда коллеги после МК пишут: Я уже попробовал это в сессии»
Самое приятное после мастер-класса – не только теплые слова. (Хотя мы их, конечно, читаем «с совершенно профессиональным спокойствием». Почти без радостного подпрыгивания на стуле 😀))
Самое ценное – когда коллеги начинают применять тему в практике.
После МК «Между «хочу» и «боюсь» участники стали писать, что начали чаще замечать полярности в клиентском м…
Комплексная травма: почему стабилизация и ресурсирование должны предшествовать любой глубокой терапии.
Работы Джудит Герман фактически заложили основу современной концепции комплексной травмы (Complex PTSD).
Подготовили для вас статью о важном этапе работы с комплексной травмой на основании 3-х-этапной модели Джудит Герман.
В карточках несколько важных тезисов. 👆
Всю статью можете прочитать на нашем сайте.
📚Чит…
👀 Бесплатная EMDR-сессия
Анонс на август.
Друзья, следующая ежемесячная групповая сессия с EMDR-переработкой состоится
📍6 августа в 15.30 МСК
⏳длительность сессии: 90 мин.
Приходите, чтобы переработать доставляющий беспокойство опыт в групповом формате ➕живительный формат групповой динамики.
ВАЖНО:
Запись не ведется – это интерактивный формат реальной сессии в онлайн формате.
Задачи сессии:
🟤помочь переработат…
Планировали полтора. Еле остановились через два с половиной😳
После мастер-класса «Между «хочу» и «боюсь» стало понятно: тема внутреннего конфликта задела очень рабочую, узнаваемую точку практики.
Коллег пришло заметно больше, чем мы ожидали.
Вопросов было много. Примеров из сессий – тоже.
И это были не абстрактные вопросы «на будущее», а очень конкретные терапевтические развилки:
🌸 как не принять защитную часть …
Перерабатывать или ресурсировать?
Наверное, каждый EMDR-терапевт хотя бы раз оказывался в этой неопределенности.
Особенно когда клиент уже устал от подготовки и хочет «наконец перейти к делу», а внутри у терапевта нет полной уверенности — достаточно ли ресурсов, чтобы идти в переработку, или еще рано.
❗️Если начать переработку сейчас, то результат будет быстрее.
❗️А если клиент еще не готов?
Но проблема не всегда…
😎Мемы, которые нас зацепили на этой неделе.
Самый наш любимый про EMDR от коллеги с Базового тренинга.
Если вы вдруг в замешательстве, какой шаг следующий на сессии, обратитесь к мудрости Николая Дроздова👆
А какие мемы вас повеселили на этой неделе. Коллеги, делитесь в комментариях💬
План мероприятий Института EMDR и Flash-терапии на август
🤗 Выдыхаем, ловим дзен и готовимся к горячей осени.
Запланировали много интересного🤫
Но даже в этот последний месяц лета, всё равно ждем вас и хотим видеть ваши лица🤎
АВГУСТ:
⏰Время - московское
🤍6 августа - 15.30 17.00 - групповая EMDR-переработка с Ольгой Тур. БЕСПЛАТНО. Проект "Поддерживающие сессии"
🤍20 августа - 11.00-14.00 - Групповая супервизия с…
🤍Для тех, кто интересуется темой работы с виной более подробно доступна запись мастер-класса Надежды Десятник:
"Освободиться от паттерна вины"
В записи мастер-класса:
⏺️ Как различать рациональную и иррациональную вину — и как этому учить клиента.
⏺️ Какие защиты чаще всего встают на пути к проработке чувства вины.
⏺️ Как правильно работать с этими защитами, чтобы увидеть через них историю клиента.
⏺️ Какие принципы…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @emdr_flash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 870,411 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Институт EMDR и FLASH” (@emdr_flash), 2,448 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emdr_flash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.