Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Берг о психологии 💌

Channel

Ольга Берг о психологии 💌

@olga_bergpsyy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,564subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537796023
TypeChannel
Username@olga_bergpsyy
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/olga_bergpsyy

Growth

15,56415,66815,6167 August 2026 — 15,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,665 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,658 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,650 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,638 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,635 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,630 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,620 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,623 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,607 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,614 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,605 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,596 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,587 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,579 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,566 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,567 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,564 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 29 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,548–15,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 23:1915,564-3
3 Sept 2026, 10:0915,567+1
2 Sept 2026, 01:0915,566-13
1 Sept 2026, 01:4515,579-8
31 Aug 2026, 02:4415,587-9
30 Aug 2026, 03:4915,596-9
29 Aug 2026, 04:1215,605-1
27 Aug 2026, 07:5415,606-8
26 Aug 2026, 07:5315,614-8
24 Aug 2026, 01:3815,622+15
22 Aug 2026, 08:0515,607-8
20 Aug 2026, 23:3415,615-3
19 Aug 2026, 20:2215,618+3
18 Aug 2026, 20:3315,615-3
17 Aug 2026, 21:4615,618-5
16 Aug 2026, 22:1315,623+3
15 Aug 2026, 16:2415,620-10
14 Aug 2026, 05:4815,630-5
12 Aug 2026, 23:2315,635-3
12 Aug 2026, 01:3815,638first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.96%
avg views ÷ 15,564 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held42 (19 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total37,653
Reactions total1,410
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,205 reactions across 42 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,35661.5%
❤‍🔥23010.4%
👎1406.35%
🔥713.22%
👍683.08%
💯341.54%
🥴301.36%
🤔291.32%
😢281.27%
🙏241.09%
💊210.952%
👀200.907%
💘170.771%
😍170.771%
🥰170.771%
🤬160.726%
🤣140.635%
🕊110.499%
🙈90.408%
80.363%
16 further kinds452.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 42 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olga_bergpsyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC316 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026

За что люблю психоанализ, тут нет линейной логики. Поэтому давайте продолжим тему, но под новым углом Как вам такой тезис - женщина, которая держит мужчин на расстоянии, через проживание неуважения к ним, как правило защищается от своего собственного сексуального желания. Так как, если женщина желает, она попадает в положение полное уязвимости, зависимости, тут же страх брошенности , УНИЖЕННОСТИ и поглощения. И о

30❤‍🔥4💯4🤣2🤪2

2 Sept 2026, 14:18 UTC668 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Женщины, которые НЕ могут уважать своих мужчин. Нет, это не связано с тем, что они не хотят или пантеры а-ля не заслуживают уважения, поэтому с их мнением можно не считаться Понимаете, это из поколения в поколения «мужчин в семье, вечный недотепа, пьяница и бестолочь», понимаете да, что я утрирую. Но власть в руках женщины. Она принимает важные решения, она распределяет деньги, она решает куда пойдут дети, да впло

❤‍🔥4413👎3💔3💯3

2 Sept 2026, 08:26 UTC697 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Уже 4 числа первая встреча в клубе с бизнес - тренером! Для многих это будет абсолютно новый опыт, так как, нас психологов быстрее найти в библиотеке 😂 чем на бизнес тренинге. И я прекрасно понимаю почему, потому что мы сильно ограничены этикой профессии , поэтому с нами плохо работают маркетинговые инструменты и прочие директивные вещи ( когда нам говорят, как делать) У нас этого НЕ БУДЕТ! Задача бизнес - тренер

6👎2🎅1

1 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC784 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Коллеги! 1 сентября 🍂 И я рада открыть вам двери в наше закрытое комьюнити, задача которого ваша устойчивая практика и профессиональная предстаяленность в медийном пространстве. Этот клуб , синтез ПСИХОЛОГИИ & БИЗНЕСА Новые форматы, которых никогда раньше не было. ♥️ клиническая секция с моими супервизиями ( где будет часть лекционная, часть учебная - работа с речью и умение слышать ее; часть - конструирование сл

🔥158👎2

1 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC862 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А вы видели мою новую рубрику в инсте Art&PsA? Где я на примере жизни художников рассказываю психоаналитические концепции? Я просто думаю, может сюда тоже эти ролики выкладывать 🤔 Вчера после анализа поехала в галлерею и застряла там на 2 часа, во-первых - первый зал с этими розовыми существами меня поразил. Идея в том, что люди часто держатся за иллюзию, это то воображаемое про которое я вам вчера в голосовом расс

30🔥7👎4😍4👍1💊1

31 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC889 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Друзья, от моего имени опять приходят сообщения и курсе !!! Пожалуйста будьте внимательны, не проходите по ссылкам, не переводите деньги на карту и прочее Пишите мне в любой ситуации, если у вас есть хоть малейшие подозрения на мошенничество!

10👎3🤬3🦄2

31 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC988 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я прилетела в Москву проходить свой анализ 💫 Еще нужно составить культурную программу, хочу в театр 💔

41🥴6😍5👎4🔥4💊3🤣2

31 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC999 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Подкаст о том, как важно анализировать и делать выводы! Сегодня 31 августа, а значит лето прошло и у каждого оно прошло по своему. И мне этим голосовым хочется пригласить вас и столкнуться с действительностью, а не беречь свое Я, поддерживая воображаемые желания. Как ваше лето ?

42👍11🔥5🥴4👎3💊3🤣3

29 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,150 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Заключительный эфир перед заключительным потоком учебно - терапевтической группой Деньги - провела! Делюсь ссылкой и ухожу на неделю в отпуск, перед стартом осеннего сезона. Что у нас в меню будет?: - с 7 сентября стартует обучение психоаналитиков в институте - с 8 сентября группа учебная Деньги - с 8,9 сентября стартуют две терапевтические группы - с 1 сентября закрытый клуб для психологов Из новинок будут анали

❤‍🔥228👎6💊2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈1,310 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Даже если ей повезло, она вышла замуж за состоятельного мужчина, она все равно найдет ЕГО БЕССИЛИЕ ( ну так она устроена 🤷🏼‍♀️) Она будет его тщательно искать и даже фантазировать об этом. Например, она увидит в его отношениях с мамой непройденную сепарацию и будет страдать от присутствия мамы в их жизни, предъявлять ему претензии «как же так, ты взрослый мужик, в маме нет не можешь сказать» Она «сделает» его боль

49😍7👎5🔥4💊2🤣1

27 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,380 views62 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Истеричка не может смериться с бессилием другого, потому она всему силами будет решать его проблемы. Отсюда огромное количество женщин, не могут смириться с тем, что их партнер например, не может заработать много, они всячески будут подкидывать ему идеи, открывать бизнесы, просить знакомых взять его на работу, самой закрывать финансовые проблемы, учиться тому, как сделать из него состоятельного и прочая активность…

34🙏9💯8👎5💊2💋2🤣2

27 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,370 views44 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Скоро рабочий сезон и я тоже с новостями для участников моего комьюнити! Вы все знаете, что оно существует уже 5 лет, это реально крутой и серьезный срок. В этом году, с СЕНТЯБРЯ мы открываем ПЛАТНЫЙ клуб, пока он закрытый, только для моих выпускников психологов. Хочу рассказать вам про КЛИНИЧЕСКУЮ секцию, где я буду проводить супервизию, но в АБСОЛЮТНО новом формате, который раньше не вела. 3 такта! 1 такт - эт

30👎5👍3💊2🔥2🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @olga_bergpsyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мария Бразговская
@MBrazgovskaia · 56,530
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Тата Феодориди
@TatFeodoridy · 60,128
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни
@anettaorlova · 40,537
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт.
@zinashamoyan · 71,638
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА
@psyaal · 38,971
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Надежда Асанова|Психология
@asanna_news · 34,721
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,208
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Берг о психологии 💌” (@olga_bergpsyy), 15,564 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olga_bergpsyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.