5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,542–6,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:02
6,555
+6
9 Aug 2026, 09:12
6,549
+3
6 Aug 2026, 09:20
6,546
+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:19
6,544
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:27
6,544
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 6,555 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.796%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (27 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
15,573
Reactions total
124
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
95
45.5%
❤
59
28.2%
👏
21
10.0%
👌
11
5.26%
🙏
9
4.31%
🤔
5
2.39%
🤯
4
1.91%
💯
2
0.957%
😁
2
0.957%
👎
1
0.478%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۷۱ درصد مدیران جلسات کاری را بیفایده میدانند!
🔸یک جلسه برگزار کردید که بیش از حد طول کشید. موضوعات زیادی برای بررسی وجود داشت و همه احساس میکردند باید نظرشان را بیان کنند. حالا هم خودتان برای جلسه بعدی دیر کردهاید و هم اعضای تیم، پس از بازگشت به میز کارشان، باید دوباره به یاد بیاورند پیش از اینکه جلسه کارشان را متوقف کند، مشغول انجام چه کاری بودند.
🔸این نه مشکل تمرکز است و نه مشکل بهرهوری. این مشکل به نحوه مدی…
مهمترین مهارتی که در تمام عمر خود می توانیم کسب کنیم، روابط انسانی برتر با سایر مردم است. ۸۵% خوشی و خشنودی ما از زندگی، از رابطه نشاط انگیز با دیگران به دست میآید.
👤برایان تریسی
کانال آموزه های سازمانی
@orgteachings
⭕️ 31 توصیه برای متقاعد کردن دیگران
● همه دوست دارند حرف بزنند ولی گوش کردن، هنر بزرگتری است. با دقت به صحبت های طرف مقابل گوش کنید.
● سخنان او را قطع نکنید.
● خواسته خود را در ابتدای گفتگو مطرح نکنید.
● با تکرار بعضی از جملات مخاطب خودتان، نشان بدهید که به صحبتهایش توجه دارید و او را درک میکنید.
● هنگام صحبت کردن از اعداد و ارقام و آمار دقیق استفاده کنید.
● مبالغه و زیاده گویی نکنید.
● برای تمام ادعاهای خو…
انسانهای موفق مزخرف!
🔸بیائید یک آزمایش فکری انجام دهیم: دو نفر را در نظر بگیرید؛ نفر اول خودخواه، دروغگو، سنگدل و متقلب. و نفر دوم بخشنده، صادق، صمیمی و کاری. شما کدام یک را بیشتر دوست دارید؟ ترجیح میدهید کدام یک رئیس، دوست و یا شریک شما باشد؟ تمایل دارید شبیه کدام باشید؟ دوست دارید موفقیت کدام یک را ببینید؟
🔸حدس من این است که شما و اکثریت معناداری، فرد دوم را انتخاب می کنید. با اینحال یک تناقض عجیب وجود دارد؛…
همهی اطرافیان شما یک معلم هستند! آنها میتوانند برای شما یک الگو و یا یک هشدار باشند. اما کلید اصلی این است که بتوانید آنها را درست در این دستهبندیها جای دهید.
👤 دارن هاردی
کانال آموزه های سازمانی
@orgteachings
برای شادکام بودن يک چيز از همه مهمتر است!
🔸دائم در گوشمان میخوانند که اگر فلانچیز را بخریم یا بیشتر پول داشته باشیم و در شغلمان موفق شویم، شادکام میشویم. اما انگار هنوز درست نمیدانیم راز شادکامی دقیقاً چیست.
برای پاسخ به این سؤال، دانشگاه هاروارد در سال ۱۹۳۸ مطالعۀ گستردهای را شروع کرد که تا امروز بیوقفه ادامه یافته است. در این سالها، این تحقیق برای یافتن راز شادکامی به بررسی و ثبتِ همزمانِ همۀ جوانب زند…
هنر «تنبلی هوشمندانه»!
🔸در «هیچ کاری نکردن» هنری وجود دارد و من سالهای زیادی از عمرم را به کمال یافتن در این هنر صرف کردهام. برخی افراد در ویولن به استادی میرسند، دیگران برای شرکت در ماراتن تمرین میکنند و من بیشتر دوران چهل تا پنجاه سالگی خود را به یافتن راههایی برای دستیابی به بیشترین نتایج با کمترین تلاشها اختصاص دادهام!
🔸انتخاب اینکه چه زمانی تنبل باشید، یا آنچه من تنبلی استراتژیک مینامم، میتواند بزرگت…
بعضی کارکنان، سازمان ما را ترک میکنند و میروند، بعضی کارکنان سازمان ما را ترک میکنند و میمانند!
دومی پنهانتر وخطرناکتر است...
کانال آموزه های سازمانی
@orgteachings
🔺کاری را که در آن ماهر هستید، انجام دهید تا احساس لیاقت و موفقیت کنید. هر کس در یک رشته و یک کار خاص بیشتر موفق است. یکی در آشپزی، یکی خیاطی، دیگری هم در کوهنوردی و ...
🔺نوع کاری که در آن مهارت دارید مهم نیست، بلکه میزان رضایتی که از خودتان بابت انجام دادنش دارید، مهم است. همان وقت که به خودتان دست مریزاد میگویید، اعتماد به نفستان جان میگیرد.
کانال آموزه های سازمانی
@orgteachings
گزارش اکونومیست: چرا شرکتهای هوش مصنوعی به استخدام فیلسوفها روی آوردهاند؟
🔺در حالی که تا چند سال پیش یادگیری برنامهنویسی به دانشجویان علوم انسانی توصیه میشد، حالا بسیاری از شرکتهای بزرگ هوش مصنوعی بهدنبال جذب فارغالتحصیلان فلسفه هستند. آمارهای جدید نشان میدهد نرخ بیکاری فارغالتحصیلان فلسفه در آمریکا حتی از فارغالتحصیلان علوم کامپیوتر کمتر شده است.
🔺شرکتهایی مانند گوگل دیپمایند، آنتروپیک و IBM از فیلسوف…
🤔5❤1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @orgteachings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 926,757 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزه های سازمانی” (@orgteachings), 6,555 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orgteachings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.