🧂 슈퍼팀 블랙 Superteam Black을 아세요? 최근 Solana 생태계를 살펴보던 중 슈퍼팀 블랙이란 계정을 찾았습니다. 크립토 커뮤니티 하신 분들이라면 들어보셨을텐데요. Superteam은 Solana 생태계를 위한 인재·창업자 커뮤니티입니다. 바운티를 노리시는 분들은 Superteam Earn이란 프로그램을 하시죠. Superteam Black은 뭔데? • 올해 4월 말 오피셜 계정 시작 • 어느 정도 성공한 Solana 스타트업을 골라 더 크게 키우는 VIP Founder Program • 형태는 Invite-only Founder Network • 규모는 동시에 약 25개 팀, 연간 약 50개 팀 👉 요약하면, 솔라나 생태계 이너서클이죠 ✍️ Solana 초기 프로젝트를 찾으시는 분들이라면, Superteam Black에…

Channel
군필여고생쟝 갓삼
@korea_crypto_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,842subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001822760451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @korea_crypto_official |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/korea_crypto_official |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,842 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 2,843 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,844 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 2,840 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 2,839 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 2,839 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.6%
- avg views ÷ 2,842 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 301
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,835 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 26 we hold a reading for · 27%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @korea_crypto_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
[단독] 구윤철, 전문가들 만나 “서울 집값 왜 오르나”…전월세 해법도 집중 논의 구 부총리는 서울 집값 상승을 우려하며 “인구가 줄어드는데 왜 집값이 오르느냐”고 진단을 요청하기도 했다. https://n.news.naver.com/article/016/0002680809?sid=101
개인 주식거래 급증에 국내 증권사 상반기 역대급 실적 1. 6일 한국투자증권은 잠정 실적 공시를 통해 올 상반기 1조7311억 원의 순이익 2. 미래에셋증권의 상반기 순이익 추산치는 2조4558억 원으로 1년 전(6641억 원)의 3.7배 수준 3. 하지만 지난달부터 조정 장세가 이어지면서 증시 거래대금이 20조 원 가까이 줄어들었음. 🔍 5-6월 같은 강한 추세가 다시 돌아올 것인가
☕️ 토스역 생긴다? 신논현역의 또다른 이름 1. 서울지하철 9호선 역명 유상병기사업이 있음. 2. 토스 운영사 비바리퍼블리카가 신논현역의 역명 병기 사업자로 선정. 낙찰가 3억 3. 9월 1일부터 역에 '신논현(토스)'가 표기 🔍 핀테크 기업이 서울 지하열 역명에 이름을 올리는 것은 토스가 처음
💲 쉽게 설명해주는 환율 작동 원리 환율은 단순히 “달러가 몇 원이냐”가 아니라, 전 세계 돈의 흐름이 어디로 가고 있는지 보여주는 숫자에 가까움. 1. 미국 금리가 낮아짐 → 달러 빌리기가 쉬워짐 2. 기업·투자자들이 싼 달러를 빌림 → 그 돈이 한국 같은 신흥국으로 들어옴 3. 달러가 들어오면 원화가 강해짐 → 주식·부동산 같은 위험자산도 같이 올라가기 쉬움 4. 그런데 미국이 금리를 올리고 QT로 돈을 회수함 → 시장에서 달러가 귀해짐 5. 예전에 달러를 빌렸던 사람들은 갚기 위해 다시 달러를 사야 함 → 달러 수요가 더 늘고, 환율이 더 오름 6. 그 결과 신흥국 통화는 약해지고 → 레버리지 쓴 기업, 성장주, 코인, 부동산 같은 자산부터 압박을 받음 📌 달러 약세 + 원화 강세 = 글로벌 유동성이 풀리는 구간 = 위험…
😊 앞으로도 펍덱 메타가 계속될 것 같은 이유 * 내 개인적인 의견 갈수록 돈의 가치는 떨어지고, 개천에서 용 나오기는 진짜 힘들어진 세대임. 평범하게 열심히 돈 벌고 저축해봐야 서울에 집 한 채 사려면 수십 년 걸림. 그러니 저축보다는 투자하는 사람 비율이 계속 늘어날 수밖에 없고, 그중에서도 크게 한 방 노리는 사람들은 결국 레버리지까지 땡기게 됨. 근데 알겠지만 과도한 레버리지 거래는 횟수가 많아질수록 시드가 0에 수렴함. 반대로 거래소는 유저가 벌든 잃든 거래할 때마다 수수료를 계속 벌고. 프로젝트 입장에서 이렇게 탄탄한 BM이 또 있나 싶음. 유저 입장에서도 이제 코인만 거래할 수 있는 게 아님. 미국 주식, 지수, 원자재까지 거래할 수 있는데 거래하면 포인트도 주고, 나중에 토큰까지 준다고 함. 어차피 거래할 거라면 펍덱을…
Perp DEX 포인트 OTC 거래 가격 정리 현재 장외거래에서 형성된 것으로 알려진 Perp DEX별 포인트 가격 • Variational: 포인트당 $25~$30 • Extended: 포인트당 $2~$3 • Perpl: 포인트당 $5~$10 • Ondo Perps: 포인트당 $0.3~$0.5 • Rise: 포인트당 $5~$7.5 • Pacifica: 포인트당 $0.2~$0.3 • Nado: 포인트당 $0.4~$0.6 최근 에어드랍 메타가 Perp DEX로 몰리고 있는 가운데, 우선 Extended가 향후 몇 주 내 TGE를 준비 중이며 다른 프로젝트들도 순차적으로 에어드랍을 진행할 가능성이 있음 다만 OTC 가격은 공식 가격이 아니며 거래 상대방과 시장 상황에 따라 크게 달라질 수 있으니 참고용으로만 보는 게 좋음 출처
증권사들 실적 다 좋게 나오겠다 😊😊😊
한투증권, 상반기 영업익 2조 전년 대비 89.1%↑ 🔗 기사 원문
🔥 롯데월드 야간 개장, SK텔레콤 장기고객을 찾아라 만 19세 이상 SK텔레콤 고객 중 10년 장기이용 고객이 신청가능하다네요. 대신 당첨시 놀이권 2매를 보내준다고 합니다. 응모일정: 8월 4일(화) ~ 8월 18일(화) 개장일정 : 9월 12일(토) 밤 11시 ~ 9월13일(일) 새벽 5시 🥹 T월드 앱 들어가셔서 어드벤처 검색하시면 딱 뜹니다. 나 8년 이용 중인데.. 10년을 못채웠누 올해도... KBW기간에 누가 롯데월드 야간개장 해줬으면 좋겠다
💚 크로노스 한국 앰버서더 모집하네요 • Web3 관심 있는 분 • 콘텐츠 제작 좋아하는 분 • 커뮤니티 활동 즐기는 분 링크에 댓글 혹은 디엠을 달라고 하네요 📌 Web3 취업 원하시는 분들은 활동 추천드립니다
🪙 Solana 프로 트레이더 행사, Frontier Traders Frontier Traders란? • 솔라나 재단이 운영하는 ‘프로 트레이더·마켓메이커 전용 VIP 프로그램 • 이번 KBW 기간에 초청형 프로 트레이더 행사 핵심 프로그램 • 8명의 트레이더가 3라운드 실시간 매매 대결 • Solana 생태계의 마켓메이커·펀드·대형 트레이더 네트워킹 • Jito, DoubleZero, Phoenix 등 트레이딩 인프라 팀과의 연결 • Frontier Traders 프로그램의 한국 참가자 발굴 luma 링크
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @korea_crypto_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 317,318 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“군필여고생쟝 갓삼” (@korea_crypto_official), 2,842 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korea_crypto_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.