Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Bronze Bear

Channel
@LegendMonkey
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003754916285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LegendMonkey |
| Description | 대한 미국 원숭이 모임(모든글은 원숭이 소설입니다 믿지마세요.) X : @MoneyMonkeycC8 trade talk : https://t.me/+PB3wtlthZtA4ZTdl 단무지 매매 법 연구자. give money give 광go |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LegendMonkey |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 61 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 614 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Bronze Bear
lets go
Signed Bronze Bear
$CYS, $ICNT, $XAN, $EDEN, $AIOZ, $ALLO listed on Upbit spot
Signed Bronze Bear
써클의 Arc를 만든 이유, 코인베이스와 관계. - 코인베이스는 써클 지분을 받고, 써클은 USDC 발행을 단독으로 통제함. 여기에 수익 배분 계약이 있음. - 코인베이스 플랫폼에 예치된 USDC 이자는 100% 코인베이스가 가져가고, 나머지 잔여 수익 50%를 가져가는 것임. - 결국, 지금은 발행과 규제 부담은 써클만 지고, 코인베이스가 유통으로 수익을 가져가는 구조임. - 써클의 매출 90%가 준비금 이자 수익임. 금리에 얹혀사는 것임... 근데 문제가 마진. - 2024년 23.2% 마진이 2025년에 5.75%로 무너짐. 코인베이스가 뜯어가면서 줄어든거... - 웃긴게 USDC 유통량은 151% 늘었는데 매출은 7% 늘었음. 성장할수록 남는게 없는 구조가 된 거... 여기에 금리 인하되면 매출도 감소함. - 써클은 욕심을…
Signed Bronze Bear
돈벌지마! 세금내! 세금내! 세금내! 돈벌지마! 잃었어? 어쩌라고! 투본선! ㅋㅋㅋ 죽자 그냥 다같이
Signed Bronze Bear
2주후부터 단돈 1원도 트래블룰 필요? 8월 11일 가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준을 폐지하는 내용의 개정안이 국무회의에 오를 예정. 이게 의결되면 당장 8월 20일부터 금액과 상관없이 전부 트래블룰 대상이 된다고 하네요.. 😠 https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42351
Signed Bronze Bear
[거래] 봉크(BONK) 거래지원 종료 안내 (9/7 15:00) 🔗 공지사항 확인하기
Signed Bronze Bear
metabase 보안사고 서드파티 보안이 생각보다 더 중요해질거라고 생각함. 이번에 Privy랑 Framework에서 고객 정보 유출 관련 안내가 왔는데, 두 회사 자체 시스템이 직접 뚫린 건 아니고 공통으로 사용하던 데이터 분석 업체 Metabase에서 제로데이 취약점이 터진 사건임. 공격자는 이 취약점을 통해 Metabase에 저장돼 있던 고객 데이터를 가져간 것으로 보이고, Framework의 경우 이름, 이메일, 전화번호, 주소 등이 노출됐다고 밝힘. 다만 결제정보나 주문정보는 유출되지 않았고, Privy 역시 지갑 인프라와 인증 시스템, 사용자 자산에는 영향이 없었다고 설명함. 특히 Privy는 지갑 인프라가 다른 시스템과 분리되어 있고 별도의 보안 하드웨어에서 운영되기 때문에 이번 사고와는 직접적으로 연결되지 않았다고 함.…
❤1
Signed Bronze Bear
캬 쥑인다 더블 원상
Signed Bronze Bear
[거래] 블록스트리트(BSB) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 🔗 공지사항 확인하기
Signed Bronze Bear
Crime lets go!!
Signed Bronze Bear
캬
Signed Bronze Bear
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @LegendMonkey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 186,677 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“몽키가든” (@LegendMonkey), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LegendMonkey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.