4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,611–3,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 19:11
3,613
+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:10
3,612
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
3,616
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:28
3,616
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 3,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
733
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.513%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
18 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
12,462
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25
86.2%
👍
3
10.3%
😭
1
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다.
정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다.
저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다.
결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다.
혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다.
제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다
@netdebtzer0 로 연…
Perp DEX 포인트 OTC 거래 가격 정리
현재 장외거래에서 형성된 것으로 알려진 Perp DEX별 포인트 가격
• Variational: 포인트당 $25~$30
• Extended: 포인트당 $2~$3
• Perpl: 포인트당 $5~$10
• Ondo Perps: 포인트당 $0.3~$0.5
• Rise: 포인트당 $5~$7.5
• Pacifica: 포인트당 $0.2~$0.3
• Nado: 포인트당 $0.4~$0.6
최근 에어드랍 메타가 Perp DEX로 몰리고 있는 가운데, 우선 Extended가 향후 몇 주 내 TGE를 준비 중이며 다른 프로젝트들도 순차적으로 에어드랍을 진행할 가능성이 있음
다만 OTC 가격은 공식 가격이 아니며 거래 상대방과 시장 상황에 따라 크게 달라질 수 있으니 참고용으로만 보는 게 좋음
출처
Trade xyz 하이닉스 청산 손실 보상 예정
• 자격 요건은 곧 나오고, 분배는 며칠 내에 완료.
• 해당 결정은 일회성 재량 결정으로 유사한 미래 조치에 대한 보증은 아님
• 앞으로 잘하겠음
https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2082260930751082821
🩸🩸하이닉스 (Trade[XYZ] 차트 기준)
6월 26일 $1,974 고점 기록
현재 약 $940
33일만에 고점 대비 약 52% 하락
🩸🩸🩸🩸삼성전자 (Trade[XYZ] 차트 기준)
6월 6일 $256 고점 기록
현재 약 $140
53일만에 고점 대비 약 45% 하락
지금 시대에는 진짜 그냥 AI 를 제대로 파서 다른 파이프라인 찾으면서 투자는 지수 투자가 무난하다고 생각이 되네 점점 갈수록 맞는듯?
본인이 SK 하이닉스와 같은 종목을 초기부터 들고 있을 수 있나? 아니면 추세 시작에 올라타서 고점에 팔 수 있나?
존버하기로 맘 먹었을때 믿음이 있어서 존버 가능한가? 수익이 다 까여도 존버가능하고 스트레스 안받을 수 있나?
자기 위안한다고 자기랑 같은 생각인 유튜버, 인플루언서 글 보면서 위안삼지 않고 그냥 존버 가능한가?
예전에 팔란티어가 10달러에 상장해서 5달러대까지 떨어질때도 존버하면서 100달러 이상갈때까지 안팔 자신 있나?
지수 추종도 어찌보면 마찬가지긴 하지만, MDD(최대 하락폭) 과 변동성이 적다는 점에서 스트레스가 적은편이고, 장기 우상향을 본다면 종목 스트레스에서 벗어날 수 있…
터키 리라 가격 근황
최근 USD 대비 27주 연속 하락했으며 최고가 대비 -99.99% 상태네요 ㄷㄷ
❤1
Signed 불타는 청춘 | X IT
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @plusevdeal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“불타는청춘” (@plusevdeal), 3,613 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plusevdeal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
