Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

이해는 병목이다

@fakedev9999tg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

761subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003270440107
TypeChannel
Username@fakedev9999tg
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fakedev9999tg

Growth

761766763.57 August 2026 — 766 subscribers7 August 2026 — 765 subscribers14 August 2026 — 761 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 760–767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:17761-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:43765-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:31766first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 761 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.771%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,383
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1578.9%
😱315.8%
👍15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC257 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

나는 프롬프트를 주로

  1. 타이핑한다91%
  2. 음성 입력한다15%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC203 viewsread 7 August 2026

오픈 리서치는 아직 과소평가되어 있다 흔히 open research라고 하면 “논문과 코드를 공개하는 것” 정도를 떠올린다. 하지만 지금 더 흥미로운 형태는 아직 풀리지 않은 문제 자체를 공개 투기장에 올리는 것이다. ecdsa.fail 이나 요즘 우리 회사에서 진행하고 있는 snark.fast가 꽤 좋은 예가 아닌가 싶다. 우리 팀에서 이 문제를 가장 깊게 파온 암호학 엔지니어가 더 쥐어짤게 많지는 않다고 했는데 일주일 만에 베이스라인 대비 3.34배까지 올라왔다. 참가자는 Flock prover를 더 빠르게 만들고, 모든 제출물은 같은 조건에서 평가된다. 한 번에 262,144개의 BLAKE3 compression을 증명하고, 전용 Apple M3 Max에서 100회 측정값의 중앙값으로 점수를 매긴다. 빠르기만 해서는 안 된다. 모든

5 Aug 2026, 04:50 UTC57 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @catallactic

제가 삼프로 티비에 출연하게 되었습니다. 항상 구독자의 입장이었다가 이렇게 직접 출연하게 되니 감회가 매우 새롭네요. 구독자 300만의 채널에서 무엇을 이야기를 해야 업계에 조금이나마 도움이 될 수 있을까 고민하다가 "과세"이야기를 좀 해봤습니다. 그냥 단순히 "과세 유예해주세요."라는 이야기를 하려는 것이 아니라, 리서치 회사의 대표로써 왜 현재 크립토 과세가 시장의 왜곡을 일으킬 수 있는지, 그리고 이게 왜 더 많은 정부 개입과 규제를 야기할 수 있는지를 이야기 해봤습니다. 1. 현재 정부의 정책 기조와 과세 체계는 서로 상충됩니다. 정부는 법인의 거래소 계좌를 점진적으로 허용하겠다는 방향을 제시하고 있습니다. 이는 분명 업계에는 긍정적인 변화입니다. 저희처럼 벨리데이터를 운영하며 업무 특성상 가상자산을 지속적으로 취득하는 회사들은,

4 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC207 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

채널 이름을 바꿨습니다. 이제는 누구나 빠르게 만들고, 쓰고, 투자하고, 의견을 낼 수 있습니다. 하지만 그것이 왜 작동하는지, 무엇이 중요한지, 어디까지 믿어야 하는지를 이해하는 속도는 그만큼 빨라지지 않은 것 같습니다. 앞으로도 AI, 크립토, 기술과 시장에 관한 이야기를 하겠습니다. 다만 소식을 전달하는 데서 끝내지 않고, 그 뒤의 구조와 맥락을 더 많이 다루겠습니다.

5

3 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

이더리움의 미래는 밝습니다 Flock 챌린지 일주일도 안 돼서 baseline 대비 200% 곧 달성 예정 https://snark.fast/

2

3 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC236 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

사장님이 미쳤어요 8,937,849,704.5 원 벌어가세요~ BitGo CEO님이 최근 사이버 보안 관련된 앤쓰로픽의 마케팅은 과장되어 있다며 본인 지갑에 100 비트 넣어가서 털어가보라고 하는중 https://x.com/mikebelshe/status/2083565334486011911?s=20

3 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC116 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dontak00

지금 내가 느끼는 상황은... 사람들은 아직도 삼전/닉스에 대한 믿음이 꺾이지 않았음. 꺾인 건 그들의 잔고임. 더 이상 적극적으로 매수 할 돈이 없음. 이런 상황에서 재밌는 것이... 매수여력이 있는 것은 외국인인데... 외국인이 지수를 올리면 똥받이가 된다는 것임. 국민연금도 팔아야하고... 물린 개인들도 본전탈출하고 싶음. 그럼 지금 지수를 올려주는 주체는 똥받이 역할을 해야 되는데... 그걸 누가 해주나?? 하는 생각이 좀 든다.. 시간이 많이 필요하려나

2 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @face_eastPhoto

한국의 레버리지가 절정에 달했을 때 심판을 내리는 이가 있었으니 그의 이름은 케네스 그리핀이라고 한다. 오늘은 그가 우리의 돈을 어떻게 빼앗아갔는지 이야기해보는 시간을 가져갔습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요: https://youtu.be/DH1Awsf5N7o

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fakedev9999tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTCFinal Results34 voters

나는 프롬프트를 주로

  1. 타이핑한다91%
  2. 음성 입력한다15%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 448,767 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“이해는 병목이다” (@fakedev9999tg), 761 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fakedev9999tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.