Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Как это сверстано

Channel

Как это сверстано

@kaketosverstano

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,299subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001632598864
TypeChannel
Username@kaketosverstano
DescriptionИгорь Штанг @nobelfaik о хитростях верстки Типографика и верстка: igorshtang.ru/course/verstka Большая переверстка: vk.com/pereverstka_online Таблицы и прочие радости: igorshtang.ru/course/tables
Created26 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaketosverstano

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,2728,3218,296.56 August 2026 — 8,278 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,278 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,277 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,272 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,281 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,274 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,281 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,278 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,277 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,278 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,281 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,279 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,278 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,296 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,312 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,314 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,321 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,315 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,312 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,307 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,302 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,301 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,300 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,299 subscribers8,2996 August 20266 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,265–8,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:148,299-1
3 Nov 2026, 10:358,300-1
28 Oct 2026, 21:198,301-1
25 Oct 2026, 23:598,302-5
23 Oct 2026, 05:388,307-5
20 Oct 2026, 09:068,312-3
17 Oct 2026, 08:508,315-6
14 Oct 2026, 11:358,321+7
11 Oct 2026, 08:368,314+2
5 Oct 2026, 03:408,312+16
26 Sept 2026, 02:598,296+18
15 Sept 2026, 08:208,278-1
11 Sept 2026, 14:228,279-2
7 Sept 2026, 07:588,281+3
30 Aug 2026, 03:548,278+1
26 Aug 2026, 19:448,277-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:378,278-3
19 Aug 2026, 21:248,281+7
16 Aug 2026, 16:278,274-7
12 Aug 2026, 14:248,281first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 8,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held21 (27 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total13,230
Reactions total589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
837
Videos
2
Links
166

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,262 reactions across 21 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤56845.0%
🔥29623.5%
😁1038.16%
❤‍🔥927.29%
👍725.71%
👏282.22%
💯262.06%
😭262.06%
🤔191.51%
👎120.951%
💘40.317%
⚡30.238%
👌30.238%
😍30.238%
🐳20.158%
🤷20.158%
🍌10.079%
💋10.079%
🤝10.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,280 views102 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Еще один мой проектик в сфере ЖКХ, но он и про типографику тоже. Рассказываю, как пронумеровал подъезды своего дома: nobelfaik.livejournal.com/289272.html

❤73🔥22👍7

Signed Игорь Штанг

2 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,500 views194 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня жесткий офтопик, но мне очень хочется вам рассказать, как я провел это лето. (Делая ремонт в своем подъезде.) Подробности в статье: nobelfaik.livejournal.com/288601.html

🔥121❤55👍16🤔1🤝1

Signed Игорь Штанг

26 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,480 views94 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Жесткий правый край Массимо Виньелли любил жесткий правый край (hard rag), то есть не сглаживал текст переносами, а оставлял «естественную» форму. В узкой колонке жесткий край выглядит особенно жестко, потому что разница между короткими и длинными строками начинает разрушать форму самой колонки, делать ее более рыхлой и менее прямоугольной. А вам нравится верстка Виньелли? Сделали бы так же? Из книги The Audubon …

❤‍🔥54❤24🤔11👎5

Signed Игорь Штанг

19 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTC≈3,070 views78 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

А какой орех сегодня ты?

😁47😭26👎5

Signed Игорь Штанг

17 Oct 2026, 05:54 UTC≈2,650 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

И плавный переход к рекламе «Типографики и верстки») Одно задание на курсе построено на методе повторения прямо буквально. Студенты копируют чужой дизайн, а чтобы было нескучно, еще переводят текст на русский язык. Это макет сложный для перевода: его невозможно повторить, сохранив размеры шрифта и отступов, — по крайней мере, ни у кого до сих пор не получилось. Верстка нижнего блока завязана на конкретных буквах и …

👏25❤21👍3

Signed Игорь Штанг

16 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC≈2,250 views72 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Повторение мать учения (но в другом смысле) Все думают, что обучение — это обязательно про какие-то правила и принципы, про внутреннее устройство чего-нибудь там, и если это внутреннее устройство не познать, то так ничему и не научишься. А на самом деле люди учатся, просто копируя чьи-то готовые решения — часто вообще без понимания. И это нормально и естественно. Видишь пример и делаешь по аналогии. Добавляешь гото…

❤‍🔥33❤18💯16💘4👎1

Signed Игорь Штанг

7 Oct 2026, 12:24 UTC≈2,480 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026

В конце открытой главы ↑ есть еще видео, в котором я подробно рассказываю об отступах в списках. С отступами все путаются, потому что вариантов много и есть различия между бумажной и экранной типографикой. Прямая ссылка на вк и ютуб

❤18

Signed Игорь Штанг

7 Oct 2026, 05:18 UTC≈7,950 views29 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Открыли главу «Список» курса «Типографика и верстка», чтобы вы могли оценить, что внутри. Успевайте прочитать до 26 октября, потом снова закроем. ➡ igorshtang.ru/course/verstka/lessons/list Ближайший поток курса начинается 26 октября, велкам.

❤28👏1

Signed Игорь Штанг

1 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,810 views22 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ласт колл фор «Большая переверстка». Начинаем в понедельник, 5 октября: vk.ru/pereverstka_online Главная тема мастер-класса — алгоритм верстки. Это мой метод последовательной сборки макета: 1. Сначала разбираемся, что именно нужно сказать 2. Потом определяем, как устроена эта информация 3. Далее собираем конструкцию макета 4. И только после этого занимаемся оформлением — шрифтами, цветами и спецэффектами Содержание…

❤11👍4🔥4😍3

Signed Игорь Штанг

1 Oct 2026, 07:55 UTC≈2,300 views53 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Советские обложки о фотографии. Все картинки с Авито #советскаякрасота

❤45🔥6🐳2

Signed Игорь Штанг

17 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,230 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Даже Ленин говорил, что …в табличках данные выступают рельефнее и компактнее. Подписывайтесь на таблички и прочие радости, товарищи: igorshtang.ru/course/tables

😁35💯8❤2👍1👏1

Signed Игорь Штанг

14 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,840 views50 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Продолжая тему сеток от Виньелли. Нашел эскизы книги «40 Years of Design», сделанные для мебельной компании Knoll в 1979 году. 1. Сетка у Виньелли, как обычно, простая, но это ни разу не мешает ему делать сложные и разнообразные конструкции. Для большинства задач достаточно регулярной сетки с одинаковыми модулями, одинаковыми полями и одинаковыми средниками. Потому что магия не в самой сетке, а в том, как она заполн…

❤26🔥19❤‍🔥5

Signed Игорь Штанг

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kaketosverstano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Оди
@awdee · 33,223
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Адовый UX
@uxfromhell · 50,329
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
дизайнерс.сайты
@cyrillicdesign · 34,424
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,116
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
UX Notes
@uxnotes · 23,528
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Книги для дизайнеров 📚
@dbooks · 62,923
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Дизайн-переводчик
@design_translator · 20,541
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
Hard Client
@hardclient · 22,925
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
mutim digital — дизайн и маркетинг
@mutimdigital · 29,989
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
Posterino | искусство плаката
@posterino · 57,025
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
Дизайн-снайпер
@designsniper · 28,023
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Дизайнер, привет
@jun_hi · 23,413
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Поясни за UX
@poyasnizaux · 20,015
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Now How Channel
@nowhow · 24,314
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel
@desprod · 25,640
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
дизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,099
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна
@pdigest · 49,055
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА
@designer_ru · 81,566
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
UI/UX Designer
@uxidesign · 20,416
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
поле
@poledsgn · 22,234
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀
@uxhorn · 21,235
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Как это сверстано” (@kaketosverstano), 8,299 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaketosverstano.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.