Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт

@designvorkel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,240subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622845623
TypeChannel
Username@designvorkel
DescriptionАвторский канал Воркель Влада, предпринимателя и eх дизайнера в Авито, Яндекс и Сбер. Пишу честно и провокационно на темы, о которых другие молчат Реклама — @advorkel_bot или @vorkel_manager https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679bafe84fb9d46696be8448
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/designvorkel

Growth

10,24010,25610,2487 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,256 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,238–10,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:3310,240-4
11 Aug 2026, 13:4510,244-4
10 Aug 2026, 12:2710,248-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:5310,250-3
8 Aug 2026, 10:1510,253-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:5310,256no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:1710,256first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 10,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (9 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total17,920
Reactions total386
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
302
Videos
45
Links
186

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

742 reactions across 19 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26936.3%
😁7710.4%
💯7510.1%
🔥587.82%
😭557.41%
👍476.33%
custom 5465309415592715918425.66%
💘354.72%
🤣152.02%
custom 5467371687089562976131.75%
🌚101.35%
🙏81.08%
💔50.674%
👀40.539%
🤪40.539%
🥰40.539%
🙉30.404%
🤝30.404%
🍌20.27%
🍓20.27%
8 further kinds111.48%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 742reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,050 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Про тестовые Лет 5 назад все делали тестовые. База рынка, все привыкли, выбора то не было Если везло — его даже могли оплатить Потом постепенно на рынок начали приходить вайтборты Зарубежная, довольно популярная практика. Казалось бы, чего сложного — бери да копируй формат, можно найти кучу зарубежных источников о том, как его проводить с обеих сторон Но это оказалось сложно. До сих пор не каждый лид понимает, ка

😭414👀4💯1custom 54653094155927159181

6 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈1,350 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, в сентябре начнется долгожданный сезон вакансий. Все выйдут с отпусков, очухаются, обновят портфолио и начнется битва за годные места. Попасть в продукт сейчас та еще история. Недостаточно просто научиться делать нормальные макеты, уже нужно больше усилий. Как оформить кейсы, о чем болтать на собеседовании, как делать тестовое, как вообще не потеряться в такой конкуренции. Если вы сейчас только заходите в п

🤣6🔥3custom 54653094155927159182custom 546737168708956297621💔1

2 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,630 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Гороскоп для дизайнеров на август Если сделать все это — осенью тебя белая полоса! Самое время для новых начинаний! Завайбкодь таск менеджер или трекер вредных привычек. Ведь если ты это не сделаешь, это сделает кто-то другой! Сходи на все корпоративные митапы Понетворкай на афиерпати со всеми челами, которым никогда не напишешь Поработай из кофейни с макбуком Ещё не сделал? А чего ждем? А фотку от туда прикрепи

32😭8🍓2💯2🌚1custom 54673716870895629761

29 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,050 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Бэклог жизни Как расставлять приоритеты правильно? Вот на работе есть продакт, который точно знает, че щас надо сделать, а на что забить. И вроде как есть на кого ответственность переложить, если чето пойдет не так А в жизни то нет Бэклог дел копится, а разгребать его нужно самому, нести ответственность за каждое решение Чуть подзабил на работу, чтобы пожить для себя — и вот ты уже плохой сотрудник. Чуть подзабил

26custom 54653094155927159186custom 54673716870895629764💯3🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,860 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁20🌚6😭6💔3😢1

26 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,920 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Каждый из нас живёт в своём пузыре В какой-то момент работы в корпе начинает казаться, что та жизнь, которую ты живешь — базовая. Твои дейли проблемы — самые серьезные и настоящие В такие моменты важно вспомнить, что мы с вами скорее всего живем лучшую жизнь)))

43💯17🙏3👨‍💻1custom 54653094155927159181

24 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈2,070 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как вырасти в карьере Гайд для всех, кто думает, что нужно просто хорошо и много работать, и тогда тебя заметят и обязательно повысят зарплату Первое Примите тот факт, что чаще вы можете оказаться там, где на ваш рост всем все равно. Да, вам может попасться классный арт-директор или лид, но он не все властен) Берите от него все, что можете, но не стоит сидеть годами там, где не платят только из-за лояльности Второе

28🔥8👍6😁4custom 54653094155927159182💯1

23 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,900 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ИТ-Пикник от Т-Банка 8 августа пройдет ИТ-Пикник в «Коломенском». И это один из немногих ивентов, куда реально прикольно сходить. Иногда нужно просто выйти на улицу, пообщаться с людьми из индустрии и провести день не за ноутом, тем более летом Что по программе • Будут лекции про создание продуктов, разработку, данные, ИИ • Отдельный трек с научпоп‑направлениями: от биологии и медицины до будущего науки. • Если над

27🔥4custom 54653094155927159183custom 54673716870895629763

19 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,030 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Дизайн — это ремесло, а не искусство Часто дизайнеры делают большую ошибку, когда начинают воспринимать себя как художников. Ведь это создает иллюзию свободы творчества: делаешь че по кайфу, а все кругом — в восторге Но че делать, если ты продуктовый дизайнер, а менеджер говорит, что зеленая кнопка ретеншн снижает Продуктовый дизайнер — тот же слесарь, который приходит к тебе домой, когда унитаз сломался. У него ес

17💯14💔1💘1custom 54653094155927159181

18 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC≈2,060 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вечерние шахматы Все по классике — заходишь по ссылке и пишешь в комменты (пока не напишешь, не начнем играть, с анонимами не интересно). Рассчитываю на несколько партий, так что ссылку буду обновлять в комментах Новая ссылочка https://lichess.org/ai9S5iLv

8custom 54653094155927159182🍾1👍1🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC≈2,720 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Яндекс Go + Юрент Ещё год назад заметил, что оба сервиса объединились в Go, но официально о сотрудничестве объявили только сейчас Причину вижу только одну — занять рынок и вытеснить Whoosh Он долгое время занимал большую часть рынка. В каждом дворе были вуши, пока Яндекс и МТС стояли где-то в стороне. А сейчас наоборот. Но я думаю не только по этой причине Прошлым летом Whoosh обновили самокаты И они стали сильно

10🤣6💯2🔥2🙈2🙉2🤝1

22 Jun 2026, 18:32 UTC≈3,470 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Время сыграть в шахматы https://lichess.org/4yQm7FJB Ток напишите в комменты кто зайдет, не круто с анонимом играть Upd: на сегодня я наигрался

8🔥3🤝2🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @designvorkel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTCAnonymous Poll243 voters

Че думаете про это?

  1. Если вижу работу, могу оставить комменты по ней19%
  2. Просто прохожу мимо53%
  3. Открыт к любой ос по моим работам41%
  4. Посмотреть ответы16%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Poll442 voters

Что чаще делаешь на работе?

  1. Продуктовые штуки, логику, все завязано на метриках16%
  2. Концепчу, создаю что-то с нуля, рисую24%
  3. Все))39%
  4. Посмотреть ответы22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 722,029 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Воркель 🧢 | Дизайн и продукт” (@designvorkel), 10,240 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designvorkel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.