Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,226–7,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 17:47
7,232
-4
7 Nov 2026, 12:44
7,236
-3
4 Nov 2026, 09:10
7,239
-3
1 Nov 2026, 03:29
7,242
-5
26 Oct 2026, 12:54
7,247
-11
23 Oct 2026, 10:27
7,258
+1
20 Oct 2026, 19:01
7,257
+3
18 Oct 2026, 00:27
7,254
-1
11 Oct 2026, 02:40
7,255
-10
4 Oct 2026, 18:38
7,265
-5
25 Sept 2026, 00:39
7,270
+4
17 Sept 2026, 02:41
7,266
-2
13 Sept 2026, 10:01
7,268
-1
9 Sept 2026, 04:02
7,269
-1
3 Sept 2026, 21:00
7,270
-2
31 Aug 2026, 02:44
7,272
+6
27 Aug 2026, 21:08
7,266
-2
25 Aug 2026, 07:45
7,268
+5
22 Aug 2026, 14:55
7,263
+2
19 Aug 2026, 11:56
7,261
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 7,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
28 (10 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
13,452
Reactions total
248
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
2m 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
791 reactions across 27 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
408
51.6%
😁
147
18.6%
🔥
73
9.23%
👍
34
4.30%
❤🔥
26
3.29%
🥰
19
2.40%
💘
16
2.02%
👏
9
1.14%
🤔
8
1.01%
😍
6
0.759%
😢
6
0.759%
💯
5
0.632%
🎉
4
0.506%
👌
4
0.506%
🤗
4
0.506%
👀
3
0.379%
🦄
3
0.379%
⚡
2
0.253%
🌚
2
0.253%
🤩
2
0.253%
9 further kinds
10
1.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
и последняя новость на сегодня.
злата зива попросила рассказать о её рисовальном чатике: https://zlataziva.ru/chatik
рисовальный чатик — это такой трёхнедельний интенсив по ведению скетчбука. на мой взгляд, очень полезная практика для дизайнеров, так что рекомендую — я и сам иногда там участвую, даже было пару раз давал задания. присоединяйтесь! набор до 14 числа.
ещё новости. маргинальная типографика, которую мы делали с соней еристави, стала победителем в жар-книге ‘26.
а в прошлом году другая моя книжечка, про красоту, которую делали с машей румянцевой, стала в жар-книге финалистом и получила спецприз.
книжечка про красоту скоро вернётся на озон и в подписные (нажимайте колокольчики), а маргинальная типографика, надеюсь, выйдет в начале следующего года.
сегодня будет день новостей.
во-первых, как обещали, с сегодняшнего дня и до конца недели на табличный курс — скидка. делаем такое редко, успейте купить.
рекомендую с практикой, потому что это в миллиард раз полезнее. почитайте отзывы.
таблички из сотого выпуска журнала oase. минимум приёмов, но при этом выглядят очень стильно. обратите внимание, что местами линейки сделаны пунктиром, а местами — заливкой, и насколько плотная вёрстка по вертикали.
с 11 ноября на табличный курс будет скидка: если планировали покупать — подождите до среды.
нравится вот этот кусочек из главы список, в котором мы компактно показали разные способы оформления списка.
это из курса «типографика и вёрстка». на следующей неделе начинаем, присоединяйтесь
в краеведческом музее мурманска попалась вот такая интересная табличка, в которой хитро разделены на две колонки значения и единицы измерения.
тут перед нами, судя по всему, два желания одновременно.
с одной стороны автору хотелось заквадратить форму таблицы, поэтому последняя колонка с правым флагом.
а с другой стороны хотелось поставить числа для удобочитаемости по разрядам. вот они и стоят в отдельной колонке.
…
если будете на следующей неделе в туле, сможете полистать прототип «маргинальной типографики» вживую, потому что он попал в список финалистов жар-книги, как и ещё много других красивых книжек. и фотки потом присылайте.
Завершён первый этап конкурса этого года! Определены финалисты Жар-книги 2026 в категории В «Новая книга». С результатами можно ознакомиться на партнерской платформе ДАФЕС
https://dafes.org/competition/b1e23c003f964e53b854f41d957276da
Поздравляем финалистов!
И ждем всех в Туле в гостеприимном пространстве ТИАМ на открытии выставки 14 октября в 18:00.
Имена победителей узнаем на церемонии награждения 17 октября в 18:3…
Открыли главу «Список» курса «Типографика и верстка», чтобы вы могли оценить, что внутри. Успевайте прочитать до 26 октября, потом снова закроем.
➡ igorshtang.ru/course/verstka/lessons/list
Ближайший поток курса начинается 26 октября, велкам.
к инфографике про куриц попалась вот такая ещё картинка про сыночку, который получится при скрещивании разных видов кошачьих.
по горизонтальному ритму чуть странно, и плашка не нужна. но какая разница, когда в этом мире существует лигр
😁41❤8
Signed михаил капанага
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @thisisnotatable. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel @desprod · 25,638 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
настенька и графики @nastengraph · 28,082 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Reveal the Data @revealthedata · 27,662 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты @cyrillicdesign · 34,412 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна @pdigest · 49,003 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Адовый UX @uxfromhell · 50,311 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Рациональные числа @rationalnumbers · 25,574 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Оди @awdee · 33,195 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
UX Notes @uxnotes · 23,488 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Инжиниринг Данных @rockyourdata · 23,679 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
LEFT JOIN @leftjoin · 41,459 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Студия Артемия Лебедева @artlebedev · 22,030 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Дизайн-снайпер @designsniper · 27,989 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Поясни за UX @poyasnizaux · 19,986 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Клуб анонимных аналитиков @analyst_club · 33,324 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“табличный дизайн” (@thisisnotatable), 7,232 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thisisnotatable.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.