Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Это Лёша

@itslyoshatg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,112subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001780616293
TypeChannel
Username@itslyoshatg
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itslyoshatg

Growth

3,1103,1123,1117 August 2026 — 3,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,110 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,112 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,110–3,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:413,112+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:503,110-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:163,111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 3,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
885
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held15 (27 October 202519 July 2026)
Views total885
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

558 reactions across 15 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52379213357027249316411.5%
custom 5375264227936181259478.42%
custom 5470113903448956707335.91%
custom 5215591607457302012325.73%
custom 5408952654325883038305.38%
custom 5393312805795407636295.20%
custom 5269457970592253702254.48%
custom 5211099715910798125244.30%
custom 5215606622662967613244.30%
custom 5271572949927737431234.12%
custom 5213453100290965421203.58%
custom 5373121155219596494203.58%
custom 5424976210939628139193.41%
custom 5470020251687073079173.05%
custom 5231383248721967785152.69%
custom 5361895016945950643132.33%
custom 5449586523869577239132.33%
custom 5391327195169831190122.15%
custom 5836993746494820791122.15%
custom 5233419277968637321111.97%
11 further kinds7513.4%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 558reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itslyoshatg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 October 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC885 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ready to go

custom 521345310029096542111custom 52110997159107981258custom 52334192779686373216

8 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,490 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Иду на «Кайференцию» от Прагматики! В прошлый раз пропустил, а потом все знакомые рассказывали, что это была лучшая дизайн-конфа в году: весёлая, с движем, дружеской атмосферой и живым разговором про дизигн Поэтому в этом году исправляюсь и 19 июля буду там. Кто ещё идёт?

custom 521109971591079812516custom 52134531002909654219custom 52334192779686373215

7 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈1,280 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все обсуждают Figma Motion, но меня больше зацепила другая фича На Config 2026 Фигма показала большой апдейт на котором показали Моушн, и он стал самым заметным апдейтом в соцсетях Это безусловно классный инструмент, потому что дизайнеры теперь ближе к анимациям. Моушн наконец становится частью дизайн-процесса. А я считаю, что дизайнеры должны уметь анимировать интерфейсы — это базовый навык для презентации своей р

custom 539331280579540763629custom 52669891160163111839custom 54472117247824566557

6 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,130 views60 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026

Я несколько месяцев не писал сюда, поэтому всё даже как-то волнительно... Канал появился 1 июля 2022 года. С тех пор прошло почти четыре года, и, кажется, только сейчас я начал понимать, почему я его создал За время моего молчания многое поменялось. Пожалуй, самое значительное — грейдап. Теперь у меня своя команда. Вместе с этим в работе появилось много нового: ответственность, ревью, онбординги, делегирование, реш

custom 523792133570272493137custom 527157294992773743114custom 54700202516870730799

6 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,160 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🔶😀🔤🌟🌱🔤 🧡🌱😶🔠

custom 523792133570272493127custom 52715729499277374319custom 54700202516870730798

17 Feb 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,020 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все эти цитаты из прекрасной статьи Джордана Голсона Там есть ещё несколько интересных цитат Айва и не только, например: С возрастом, по мере того как я становлюсь более ворчливым, для меня важнее, с кем я работаю, чем над чем я работаю. Я закончил работать с мудаками Когда вы пишете, вы вынуждены лучше объяснять свои мысли и заставляете читателя вникать в детали — это, кстати, причина по которой я люблю писать по

custom 537526422793618125913custom 521560662266296761310custom 53913271951698311906

17 Feb 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,340 views54 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Против потока Наверное, вы уже видели дизайн интерьера для первого электрокара Феррари от студии LoveFrom (да, это Джони Айв и Марк Ньюсон). И, наверное, вы уже заметили, что, несмотря на то что это интерьер электрокара, в нём нет огромного сенсорного дисплея А ещё, наверное, вы уже знаете, что LoveFrom потратили шесть месяцев на исследования. В результате Феррари получили четыре книги: не об интерфейсах, а о филос

custom 537526422793618125934custom 521560662266296761314custom 53913271951698311906

21 Jan 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,340 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @eldanielleee

Ищу дизайнера-стажёра в команду Яндекс Электро ⚡️ Ребятки, мы двигаемся семимильными шагами к очень крутым запускам, поэтому ищу усиление в нашу команду — дизайнера, который поможет с сайтом, мобильным приложением и HMI электомобиля (Human-Machine Interface). На время стажировки у вас будет два ключевых вектора: 1️⃣ Будете совершенствовать текущие и проектировать новые пользовательские сценарии для сайта, мобильно

custom 537312115521959649416custom 54495865238695772398custom 53909315728472953987

21 Jan 2026, 11:44 UTC≈2,250 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Даня плохую вакансию не выложит. Да ещё и для стажёров — нечасто такие вакансии появляются

custom 54495865238695772395custom 53731211552195964944custom 53909315728472953983

12 Jan 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,710 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока открывается Фигма, ловите сайт с прикольными штуками для дома (и не только), у которых есть «дизайнерский вайб». Хорошая возможность пополнить опустевшие после Нового года вишлисты

custom 536189501694595064313custom 52403581927722921305custom 52334881005245650343

31 Dec 2025, 13:50 UTC≈2,790 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2025 Привет! Давно я не писал постов... Но нужно же подвести итоги года! У меня вышел ударный год: работа и сайдпроекты захватили практически всёёё свободное время. Даже в отпуск я ходил всего один раз и не потратил все свои отпускные дни С переходом в ВБ 😚 у меня появился простор для роста: веду несколько продуктов, стал делать анимации в Джиттере, чтобы показывать макеты, участвую в построении процессов и беру и

custom 521559160745730201232custom 542497621093962813919custom 52130466202911057317

25 Nov 2025, 08:05 UTC≈2,520 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сделал канал… который ведёт себя сам! В англоязычной части интернета очень много хороших статей и кейсов о продуктах и дизайне в целом. Но искать эти статьи лень, а читать их на английском — не всегда удобно. Поэтому я навайбкодил себе канал, который делает всё за меня: ChatGPT находит статьи, проверяет, чтобы они подходили под тематику и были интересными, делает перевод и сокращённый пересказ! А если хочется почита

custom 526945797059225370225custom 540895265432588303819custom 54024979025955466664

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @itslyoshatg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 657,743 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Это Лёша” (@itslyoshatg), 3,112 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itslyoshatg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.