Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Короче, капитан – Запускаем мини-приложения

@its_capitan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

80,572subscribers

+502 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577433533
TypeChannel
Username@its_capitan
DescriptionВеду проекты на 6млн+ юзеров. Устроил челлендж по запуску 12 маленьких IT-проектов за 12 месяцев. Показываю как разрабатываем, где продвигаем, что зашло и что не очень. Делюсь метриками, которые обычно скрывают. Связь с автором: @ig_zuev
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/its_capitan

Growth

80,07080,57280,3216 August 2026 — 80,070 subscribers6 August 2026 — 80,070 subscribers6 August 2026 — 80,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 80,262 subscribers8 August 2026 — 80,265 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,306 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,328 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,366 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,572 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,995–80,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0380,572+206
12 Aug 2026, 00:0680,366+38
10 Aug 2026, 21:0380,328+22
10 Aug 2026, 00:3080,306+41
8 Aug 2026, 23:3880,265+3
7 Aug 2026, 20:2680,262+72
6 Aug 2026, 22:1080,190+120
6 Aug 2026, 02:0080,070no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5280,070first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 80,572 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,100
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.966%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (1 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total324,340
Reactions total3,132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
242
Videos
6
Links
307

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,386 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,10147.9%
1,15926.4%
👍95721.8%
😱631.44%
❤‍🔥420.958%
🤩270.616%
😈250.57%
🐳120.274%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,500reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 24 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @its_capitan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈4,680 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Наша онлайн-экскурсия в комьюнити билдеров началась: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85104085699?pwd=h6liOGvlhL68eJ70WOcZlvxrl1ZayN.1 Забегайте к нам) Сегодня будет интересно 🤝

🔥41👍2722❤‍🔥3🤩1

12 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC≈8,060 views153 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙊 Платят за конвертер файлов? Серьезно?? Cамый частый вопрос в личку после предыдущего поста: Конвертор файлов можно самому собрать за 1 вечер! Почему за него платят? Краткий ответ: не нужно судить по себе. Мы с вами сидим в ПУЗЫРЕ, где можем завайбкодить для себя простое решение за 1 вечер. А теперь задумайтесь о таких фактах: – вайбкодит меньше 1% населения планеты – обычным ChatGPT пользуется лишь каждый 9-й

🔥6642👍40😱3❤‍🔥1🐳1

11 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC≈10,300 views154 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Эмоции от первых покупок бесценны 👆 Юра из нашего комьюнити сделал довольно простой конвертор файлов. Выше на скрине – его реакция сразу после включения монетизации в первый день. Спустя 4 дня в приложении уже $150+ выручки. Это только начало. Но по себе могу сказать – ощущения от первых покупок в своем проекте запоминаются на всю жизнь. И дело не только в деньгах. Когда твою пользу ценят, это безумно приятно. И

🔥6643👍39😱5🤩1

10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈12,000 views129 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💣 Где AI применяют в последнюю очередь, а зря Уже 13 августа проводим конференцию, где собрали кейсы применения AI в сферах, на которые смотрят реже всего. Например, вайбкодить через AI научились почти все. Но какой толк от проекта, если его не находят пользователи? Я выступаю в 16:00 и расскажу, как мы продвигаем и монетизируем наши проекты с помощью AI. Здесь список всех тем и спикеров: 15:30 — Андрей Резинкин

🔥6630👍30❤‍🔥1😈1😱1

7 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈16,100 views147 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

👨🏻‍💻 Наше комьюнити изнутри на 1 конкретном примере Рассказываю на 1 конкретном примере, как устроено наше комьюнити 👇 Мы с Денисом и Ксюшей запустили и продвинули YouTube to Text. Проект уже давно перевалил за пятизначную выручку в $ в месяц. И продолжает расти. Далее мы соединили ребят с такими же сильными участниками из комьюнити: Пригласили Наташу и Диму, чтобы создать сайт под этот проект по нашему методу.

🔥68👍3835❤‍🔥3🤩2🐳1

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈17,100 views160 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💔 Все умеют кодить. А кто продвигает проекты через AI? Люди сходят с ума по вайбкодингу (который на самом деле усилил конкуренцию, а не упростил запуск). Мы собрали конференцию об AI в задачах, о которых говорят гораздо реже, чем про вайбкодинг. А зря: туда почти никто не смотрит, хотя там зарыта гораздо большая польза для вашего проекта от AI. Я выступаю в 16:00 и расскажу, как мы продвигаем и монетизируем наши

62🔥57👍37❤‍🔥2🤩1😱1

5 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈17,200 views164 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎈 $8,9К за июль в простом приложении В июле наш toneperfect.app для тренировки китайского произношения приблизился к $9К. Вы видели его запуск с нуля 5 месяцев назад. Это +117% к июню. Рост больше чем в 2 раза за месяц. Начали с маленького проекта, а не пытались сразу построить космический корабль. Весь июль плотно общаемся с инвесторами, т.к. хотим отмасштабировать этот рост. Цель – не просто деньги, а борд из

🔥78👍4235😱6😈2❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈17,800 views168 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

👨🏻‍💻 Чат со всеми русскоязычными основателями с выручкой $1К+ в месяц Лучшее, что может сделать основатель, чтобы ускорить рост своего проекта – это пообщаться с другим основателем. Мы создали крупнейшее комьюнити инди-хакеров в СНГ по выручке. Сейчас мы собираем отдельный чат участников с выручкой от $1К в месяц. И приглашаем вас. На основе этого чата также создадим чаты тех, у кого выручка более $5K+, $10К+ и $

🔥8342👍36🤩3😱3❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC≈24,000 views274 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎰 Мини-приложения – это "темка"? Иногда слышу, как мини-приложения приравнивают к дорвеям из 2010-х, схемам уровня купи-продай и другим "нишам для быстрого заработка". Забавно, что чаще всего так говорят те, кто сам этим "быстром заработком" раньше и занимался. Это опасный взгляд, из-за которого вы можете потерять кучу времени. Возьмем пример: Простой конвертер картинок, за который у нас пользователи платят. Те

🔥119👍7870🐳3❤‍🔥2🤩2

29 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈22,300 views171 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😳 Встроили ИИ-чат в маленький сайт. Он приносит ~$400 в месяц всего с 1000 пользователей! Если у вас есть аудитория, дочитайте до конца. Посмотрите на скрин выше 👆 Выручка этого простенького сайта сама по себе еще скромная: $734 выручка, $603 прибыль в месяц. Но такой прибыли НА ОДНОГО ПОЛЬЗОВАТЕЛЯ я давно не видел. И это на ру-рынке! Теперь по порядку: Мы развиваем bota.chat. Это ИИ-чат со всеми современными

🔥63👍5147😈5🤩3❤‍🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTCviews —

Короче, капитан – Запускаем мини-приложения pinned a photo

28 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈19,300 views249 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Личная история для старичков канала. Много лет назад я создал этот канал. Нужно было придумать название. Из всех возможных критериев я почему-то выбрал один: название должно похоже читаться на разных языках. "Капитан" подходил идеально: captain на инглише, capitán на испанском, kapitän на немецком. Везде похоже. Даже на моем втором языке – венгерском – все равно kapitány. А это показатель: венгры придумали свое

🔥10968👍61🤩4😱4😈3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @its_capitan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@its_capitan edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,173 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Короче, капитан – Запускаем мини-приложения” (@its_capitan), 80,572 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/its_capitan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.