Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Figma Design

@figmadesign

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

106,776subscribers

-144 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443540902
TypeChannel
Usernames@figmadesign @figmaplugin
DescriptionСотрудничество: @normanross
Created16 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/figmadesign

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

106,776106,920106,8486 August 2026 — 106,920 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,920 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,919 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,896 subscribers6 August 2026 — 106,895 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,878 subscribers7 August 2026 — 106,878 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,862 subscribers8 August 2026 — 106,864 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106,831 subscribers10 August 2026 — 106,816 subscribers10 August 2026 — 106,812 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,801 subscribers11 August 2026 — 106,789 subscribers12 August 2026 — 106,780 subscribers12 August 2026 — 106,776 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 7 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106,754–106,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:56106,776-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:03106,780-9
11 Aug 2026, 12:43106,789-12
11 Aug 2026, 10:22106,801-11
10 Aug 2026, 12:46106,812-4
10 Aug 2026, 10:35106,816-15
9 Aug 2026, 13:23106,831-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:32106,833-31
8 Aug 2026, 12:45106,864+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:35106,862-16
7 Aug 2026, 14:04106,878no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:33106,878-17
6 Aug 2026, 16:24106,895-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:41106,896-23
6 Aug 2026, 03:45106,919-1
6 Aug 2026, 01:33106,920no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:12106,920first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 106,776 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (18 May 20269 August 2026)
Views total60,100
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
982
Videos
310
Links
1,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 43s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @figmadesign. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
18,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
21,100
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjbricsM113 July 202613 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

В Figma появились вложенные папки. Теперь папки можно создавать внутри других папок, выстраивая многоуровневую структуру для файлов и проектов. Вместе с этим Figma обновила логику шаринга и прав доступа для такой структуры. Функцию уже начали раскатывать, в течение нескольких недель она станет доступна всем пользователям.

6 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈11,100 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Mega Warp — бесплатный плагин для трансформации слоёв: перспектива, изометрия, 3D-повороты, изгибы и мокапы произвольной формы. Есть пресеты и предпросмотр в реальном времени. Install plugin

28 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈16,200 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Smooth Corners — плагин, который добавляет Apple-style continuous corners к любому фрейму, прямоугольнику или изображению. Install plugin

14 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈21,100 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

3D Inflate Shader — шейдер, который позволяет буквально в пару кликов превратить любой элемент в объемный 3D-объект. Открыть в Figma Community

13 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC≈18,200 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjbricsMVideo

Смотреть на чужие курсоры в Figma — бесплатно. Обсуждать дизайн, продукты и реальные кейсы с теми, кто их делает, — уже на Кайференции. 19 июля в Москве «Прагматика» соберет более 600 специалистов из сферы дизайна, продуктов и диджитала. Вместо привычных лекций — живое общение, дизайн-батл с участием команд Авито, МТС, Т-Банка и других компаний, открытый микрофон и активности для нетворкинга. Это возможность познак

7 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC≈18,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Figma опубликовала AI Report 2026 Главное: AI перестает быть инструментом для одного человека и становится способом совместной работы команд. Несколько интересных цифр: – 41% специалистов считают, что AI уже заметно меняет командную работу. Два года назад так отвечали только 7%. – Дизайнеры все чаще участвуют в разработке: с 21% до 41% за год. – Разработчики, наоборот, активнее вовлекаются в дизайн: с 44% до 60%. –

4 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC≈15,500 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Big Crunch — плагин, который заменяет ручную подготовку изображений после экспорта из Figma. Меняет размер, конвертирует в WebP/JPG/PNG и сжимает файлы до нужного веса. Intall plugin

25 Jun 2026, 08:20 UTC≈24,400 views0 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Что показали на Figma Config 2026 Figma активно развивает платформу в сторону «всё в одном». Главные анонсы: Figma Motion — полноценная нативная анимация прямо в Figma. Таймлайн, кейфреймы, 3D-трансформации, пресеты и экспорт в MP4, GIF и готовый код. Custom Shaders — создание собственных шейдеров и эффектов по текстовому промпту (liquid metal, mesh gradients, distortion и др.). Работает на WebGPU. Weave — систе

15 Jun 2026, 16:40 UTC≈23,800 views0 reactions13 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

В Figma появилась возможность группировать вкладки.

11 Jun 2026, 17:06 UTC≈46,100 views0 reactions9 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Теперь сайт можно буквально перенести в Figma. Новое расширение для Chrome импортирует страницу и автоматически разбивает её на редактируемые слои. figma.bot/ChromeExt

7 Jun 2026, 08:47 UTC≈29,300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Higgsfield выпустили плагин для Figma Теперь можно генерировать изображения и видео прямо внутри Figma, не переключаясь между десятком вкладок.

2 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC≈20,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Контролировать слоты стало проще → Настраивайте минимальное и максимальное количество слоёв → Используйте только предпочтительные инстансы → Показывайте пустой слот по умолчанию → Устанавливайте Fill как значение по умолчанию

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @figmadesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,722 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Figma Design” (@figmadesign), 106,776 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/figmadesign.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.