Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мысли Романа

@shaaadrin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,897subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002049422612
TypeChannel
Username@shaaadrin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shaaadrin

Growth

1,8971,9011,8996 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,899 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,898 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,897 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,896–1,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:341,897-1
9 Aug 2026, 16:211,898-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:411,899-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:361,901no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:301,901first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 12 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 9 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24841.5%
🔥15325.6%
❤‍🔥538.86%
👍538.86%
😁274.52%
🏆142.34%
💯122.01%
👏91.51%
🫡61.00%
50.836%
40.669%
😱40.669%
🗿20.334%
😢20.334%
👎10.167%
🤔10.167%
🤝10.167%
🤡10.167%
🤩10.167%
🤯10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 9 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shaaadrin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 November 2024 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 17:04 UTC927 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

про вайбкодинг Первое правило вайбкодинга — если ты вайбкодишь, об этом должны знать все. Вайбкодинг — абсолютно дофаминовая история, потому что гэп между тем, что ты делаешь, и получением результата (а значит, и удовольствия) максимально сокращён. Он сильно меньше, чем в классической разработке или любом творчестве — поэтому вызывает гораздо более интенсивный набор эмоций. Поймал себя недавно на том, что вайбкод

37💯10🔥5🫡2👍1🤝1

31 May 2026, 15:31 UTC950 views64 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

про работу Меня очень трогает история Сафонова. Она не столько про футбол, сколько про жизнь вообще. Тебя маринуют на вторых ролях, берут за большие деньги конкурента на позицию, вокруг мало, кто в тебя верит, а дома иронично гадают, когда ты вернешься. Но благодаря ежедневной усердной работе в момент, когда тебе выпадает шанс, ты им пользуешься и доказываешь, чего стоишь. Сколько людей в такие моменты ломаются?

42🏆14🔥6💯2

21 May 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,220 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

про запрет на AI Когда я задумался о реанимации этого канала, пообещал себе не писать ничего про AI. Не в знак протеста и скепсиса, а потому что про AI и без меня всё либо уже сказано, либо завтра устареет. Следить за происходящим и успевать рефлексировать про это физически невозможно. Смущает ещё, что у темы есть нагнетающий флёр (думаю, коллеги по IT меня поймут). Ты можешь общаться с Chat GPT чаще, чем со своими

🔥155🫡4🗿21👍1

19 May 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,040 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

про апдейты в продукте Заглянул на днях в прошлое, а именно на графики MAU, и осознал, что за неполные два года приложение Яндекс Пэй выросло в 3 раза, а DAU/MAU — в 1.6х. Получается, что аудитория не только стала больше, но и пользуется сервисом чаще. Конечно, всегда хочется больше и лучше, но, по-моему, это круто, и нам есть чем гордиться! Провёл небольшую ревизию того, что классного ещё произошло, пока я отсутст

👍21🔥1413👏7😱4

1 May 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,320 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

После вчерашнего поста часть подписчиков не дождались новой аватарки и ожидаемо перестали быть подписчиками. А для тех, кто остался, я подготовил импровизированную рубрику выходного дня «Ответы на вопросы и как дела у подписчиков»: 👦 Подписчик Misha Naer пишет: Расскажи что-нибудь интересненькое что делаете в пэе У нас впереди горячий сезон больших запусков — буду стараться рассказывать. В фокусе платежный опыт, по

😁2113🔥3🤔1

30 Apr 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,360 views83 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет✌️Если вдруг вы забыли про этот канал и не успели отписаться, это я — меня зовут Рома Шадрин, я руковожу продуктом в сервисе Яндекс Пэй, и это мой канал, в который последний раз я писал полтора года назад. Как у вас дела? Что нового? Говорят наступила эпоха AI, разработчики, дизайнеры и менеджеры больше не нужны, а телеграмом в России стало невозможно пользоваться. Но, если честно, я в это слабо верю. WYT

❤‍🔥46🔥1814😁5

13 Dec 2024, 11:42 UTC≈5,150 views92 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Финтех впервые участвовал в YaC. Это супер важное событие для всей команды, которая с нуля построила огромное количество классных и полезных продуктов. И, конечно, мечта одного закоренелого яндексоида, который уже почти десять лет следит за апдейтами компании на YaC. Мы вместе с Лизой Улановой, руководителем Яндекс Сейвов, рассказали о продуктовой линейке Финтеха в серии Впечатления. Обсудили и проверили в полях, к

56🔥23❤‍🔥7👍5👏1

23 Nov 2024, 13:54 UTC≈5,080 views82 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите, какую красоту дизайнеры Яндекса нарисовали. 100 обложек классической литературы для сервиса Яндекс Книги. Четыре работы там от ребят, которые работают или работали в Финтехе: Ника, Андрей, Кирилл и Аня. Мне всегда нравилось, что у дизайнера в Яндексе есть возможность помимо рабочих проектов делать что-то творческое для души. Все работы тут

42👍21🔥124😢2😁1

12 Nov 2024, 11:23 UTC≈4,020 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите, какую красоту сделала команда Сейвов. Это фирменный ключик от самого приятного и простого на рынке накопительного продукта в коллаборации с Moonswoon Доступен он правда только для сотрудников Яндекса и в ограниченном количестве, но я не смог не поделиться красотой. Аплодисменты Алине Корнетовой и Ане Цыбиной!

🔥5730👍4👎1👏1🤡1🤩1🤯1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @shaaadrin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 913,974 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Пэй
@yandexfintech · 181,144
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мысли Романа” (@shaaadrin), 1,897 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaaadrin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.