Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор

@ilyaskopin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,981subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653889079
TypeChannel
Username@ilyaskopin
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilyaskopin

Growth

9,9819,9909,985.57 August 2026 — 9,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,987 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,990 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,981 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,980–9,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:169,981-9
10 Aug 2026, 19:429,990+3
7 Aug 2026, 21:479,987-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:319,989no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:299,989first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.5%
avg views ÷ 9,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,050
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (9 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total30,470
Reactions total562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
1m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

645 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16725.9%
😁11517.8%
🤣10616.4%
🔥8613.3%
❤‍🔥416.36%
💯385.89%
👍314.81%
😨162.48%
🥴162.48%
💘60.93%
🗿50.775%
🎃40.62%
👻30.465%
💊30.465%
🤯20.31%
🫡20.31%
🌚10.155%
👀10.155%
🤔10.155%
🥱10.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilyaskopin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,710 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Если послушать всех рукопожатных аи-адоптеров, послушать все цели рукопожатных топ-менеджеров, то всё сводится к понятной и приземленной цели: нужно стараться каждый месяц сжигать лимит максимальной подписки (условной Pro от Open AI за 100$) артефакт: новые нейронные связи, и блин, реально, это работает! просто попробуйте сжечь лимит )) столько придумаете нового

😁37👍101

31 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,560 views57 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

Так, ну давайте, вы же продуктовые дезигнеры, объясните плз, по какой логике крестик слева, а по какой справа. Я не понимаю, например 🤔

🤣25😨15💯8👍3👻3🫡2🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈3,420 views53 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

У меня в фигме давно лежит иллюстрация на тему одного из приницпов дизайна интерфейсов — доведение до самой сути, на примере Winamp'a. Кста, олды наверняка помнят, сколько раньше было "скинов" :)

44👍9

28 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC≈3,280 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

8 августа в Коломенском пройдёт ИТ-Пикник большой летний фестиваль для людей из технологий и их близких для ИТ-специалистов всех грейдов: дизы, аналитики, манагеры, разрабы, весь пайплайн ▪️весь движ на природе ▪️спикеры из Т-Банка, Яндекса, Авито, Сбера, Okkо, Дринкита ▪️можно с семьёй: будут мастер-классы, музыкальные лабы, шахматы, десткие зоны ▪️будет много музла: современный инди‑поп и поп от известных артисто

🔥55💊3🤣31🥱1

27 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,120 views102 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Блин, смешно. Я выступал на продакт фесте в субботу с в блоке поразгонять про AI, всместо Мердана, он приболел. Состав хороший: Никита, Саша и Миша — познакомились за кулисами, оч опытный и интересный мужик. Кмк, я бы с ним про кино мог весь день разговаривать. Так вот, когда мы заканчивали этот блок: от зала осталось 10%, все ушли :)) В глазах людей считывалось что-то типо: "КАК ЖЕ ВЫ ЗА****И СО СВОИМИ АИ / С КАЖДО

😁78💯195

24 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC≈3,400 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

AI-агент поможет сгенерировать 50 вариантов. Но не скажет, какой делать Важный дисклеймер: на данном этапе развития AI-адопшена в продуктовый дизайне существует проблема: дизайнеры без привязки к продукту могут делать всё, что угодно, но находясь в продукте, аи-адопшен спотыкается об продуктовый контекст Артефакт мысли: в этом и проходит граница между креативом и продуктовым решением НАПРИМЕР: вы работаете в б2б,

🔥15💯115

23 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC≈3,110 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Роль дизайнера в этом году стремительно меняется 🫤 Раньше процесс был простым: получил ТЗ, нарисовал экраны, передал их разработчику и ждал релиза. Сейчас в сильных командах этот процесс уходит. Часть команд топов вроде Сбера, Альфы и МТС переходят на AI-first подход: дизайнер не только проектирует интерфейс, но и с AI-агентами собирает первую версию продукта, вайбкодит прототип, тестирует фичу на юзерах и сокращает

🤣19🥴164🎃4🗿2🤯2🌚1👀1

21 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,820 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Cмотрите какая милота. AI видео-подарок на свадьбу (не мою, нашёл в линке) Автор: pure.sagyna

51🔥9💘6🗿3

20 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,960 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Final2.psd / Song2.mp3 В 97 году пацаны, которые играли исключительно бритиш-поп, решили затролить свой лейбл и сделали пародию на гранж-рок — грязная и громкая гитара, агрессивный стилёк чтобы "blow the flipping record labels' heads off". У неё не было даже названия, тут как у нас когда-то final.psd, final2.pdf – только song2.mp3. Так и оставили. А когда релизнули — оказалось, что они перевыполнили метрики: тройн

17🔥4👍1

17 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈3,090 views65 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Школа дизайна Яндекса и Никита Аквапарк В 2021 году, насколько я помню, была последняя школа дизайна яндекса, я там был куратором, у меня была своя группа. Кста, каждый из группы по итогу попал в Яндекс, кроме одного чувака, я его хорошо запомнил и вот почему :) Его звали (условно, а может и не условно) Никита. И на первую групповую встречу, а они ещё были оффлайн, где мы прорабатывали кейсы, обсуждали лучшее решен

🤣59👍4🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈3,430 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Две школы / два стула Если глянуть на главную двух больших OTA (на самом деле и другие страницы тоже) Booking и Airbnb в разрезе 4 лет, возникнет вопрос: зачем букингу 24 тысячи сотрудников (в Airbnb ± 8 тысяч), где с точки зрения пользовательского опыта они практически не меняются, в отличие от Airbnb, с крупными обновами 2 раза в год. Букинг не меняется визуально (на самом деле меняется, но оооч медленно), потому

❤‍🔥4111

9 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,660 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В Шанхае привычный для нас паттерн взаимодействия с гео-сценариями идёт нахрен:)) Тут же Яндекс Карты нужно скачивать местные - AMAP, они жесточайше бесячие: постоянное подзумливание, нельзя крутить, карточка объекта сверстана я даже не знаю как объяснить, по какой логике)) категоризация кластеров - gg wp 🫡 Местный Яндекс Такси (диди) завязан на этот amap, и всё это это в обвязке «мини-аппа» в «супер-аппе» Алипэй

28👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ilyaskopin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 414,305 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скопин | Яндекс | dsgn-директор” (@ilyaskopin), 9,981 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilyaskopin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.