10 000+ дизайн-вакансий на удаленку, фриланс, релокейт и офис от designer.ru
——
🚀 Каждый день > https://t.me/designer_ru_work
——
❌ Мы не покупаем/не продаем рекламу
—-
👑 Клиентам > https://designer.ru/~KgvXG
—-
📩 Вопросы > info@designer.ru
Created
Between 1 April 2016 and 31 August 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,959–78,237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:47
78,205
+17
12 Aug 2026, 16:34
78,188
+59
11 Aug 2026, 13:25
78,129
+39
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
78,090
+12
9 Aug 2026, 16:06
78,078
+9
8 Aug 2026, 16:11
78,069
+7
7 Aug 2026, 19:41
78,062
+44
6 Aug 2026, 17:01
78,018
+27
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
77,991
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:18
77,991
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 78,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.189%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
20 (29 December 2024 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
15,900
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
33
Videos
4
Links
540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,459 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,349
54.9%
🔥
373
15.2%
😁
370
15.0%
🤔
156
6.34%
😢
84
3.42%
🥰
67
2.72%
👏
34
1.38%
😱
21
0.854%
🤯
3
0.122%
🤬
2
0.081%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,459reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
20.0%
4 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
27,700
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
62,800
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGQKSbj
1
24 May 2026
24 May 2026
2W5zFHYi74dc
1
16 July 2026
16 July 2026
2W5zFJEt9a1
1
12 June 2026
12 June 2026
2W5zFJnMhNH
1
26 May 2026
26 May 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 16 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Проект PabstArt подвел итоги!
За два месяца более 700 работ прошли через четыре этапа оценивания топами индустрии, а некоторые даже поучаствовали в народном голосовании.
Имена 30 победителей, чьи арты напечатают на банках Pabst Blue Ribbon Best Select, смотрите здесь. Они забирают денежные призы, подарки и крутой кейс в портфолио. Это успех🏆
Также проект объявил победителя народного голосования. Им стала Анна Маст…
100 000 рублей и печать вашего дизайна на миллионе этикеток продукта Pabst — конкурс PabstArt опубликовал список призов:
🏆 Топ-3 заявят о себе всей индустрии — их дизайн напечатают на миллионе банок продукта Pabst по всей стране, а авторы получат денежные призы: 100 000, 70 000 и 50 000 рублей;
🏆 4–10-е места заберут грант на обучение в Bang Bang Education, а их дизайн украсит коллекцию мерча;
🏆 11–30-е места увид…
100 000 ₽ и ваш арт на миллионе этикеток продукта Pabst — призы в конкурсе PabstArt
Pabst Blue Ribbon запустили проект для иллюстраторов и дизайнеров. Это шанс заявить о себе и положить в портфолио необычный кейс!)
Создайте дизайн этикетки, зацепите жюри и, возможно, именно с вашей работой выйдет лимитированная версия продукта, а ещё коллекция мерча. Помимо этого, победители получат от 50 000 до 100 000 ₽ и другие …
Портфолио — единственная вещь, которую дизайнеры умеют откладывать лучше, чем делать.
Поэтому анонсируем мотивацию:
4 мая стартует восьмой ¡Portfolio Hero! — бесплатный челлендж от Duo Sapiens для тех, у кого нет портфолио и тех, кто хочет его обновить.
12 дизайнеров будут разбирать работы в прямых эфирах: смотреть на логику, структуру и подачу. Это синьоры, лиды и арт-диры из Т-Банка, Яндекса, Прагматики, Aic, Xs…
Дорогие Девушки ❤️ Это был непростой год. У каждой из нас этот год сложился по разному. Год позитивный для нас практически по всем направлениям. Это был год насыщенный и полный забот. Мы уже увереннее смотрим в будущее. Как никогда. Этот год мы прошли достойно. Давайте поднимем бокалы и под бой курантов разгадаем желание, чтобы следующий год был еще более эцсамое. И чтобы мы прошли его еще более и не смотря ни на что…
Итоги-шмитоги 👁👁
Когда-то в далеком 2019 году я нарисовал эту картинку, и она до сих пор ни разу не устарела.
Весь этот год рынок найма дизайнеров выл нечеловечески. Сотни ребят увольняли, еще несколько тысяч безработных ребят не понимали, что происходит. Тревога множилась.
1500+ уникальных дизайн-вакансий мы опубликовали за 2025. Уникальных вакансий — это когда не надо воровать у других платформ. Уникальных — это…
Ищем дизайнеров. Все наши! Все уникальные:
1) Яндекс ищет дизайнера продукта в Алису Удаленка или Офис (Москва)
https://designer.ru/~6QTh3
2) Pixel Point ищет бренд-дизайнера Удаленка
https://designer.ru/~9jhA3
3) Pixel Point ищет в команду продуктового дизайнера Удаленка
https://designer.ru/~KZ03b
4) Бюро проектов «Мохито» ищет руководителя отдела дизайна Офис (Санкт-Петербург)
https://designer.ru/~33n9K
5) Ne…
❤92🔥21😢5👏4😁2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @designer_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 369,537 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИЩУ_ДИЗАЙНЕРА” (@designer_ru), 78,205 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designer_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.