↑ Наши клиенты Недавно мне сказали, что Sasha™ — это нишевая студия, которая работает с артистами и селебрити ) На самом деле мы делаем немало проектов для бигтеха (комплексный брендинг, айдентика, web, cg), но многое под NDA. Хочу сказать огромное спасибо нашим клиентам, которые приходят и возвращаются к нам снова. Особенно команде Яндекса, с которыми мы продуктивно работаем последние два года.

Channel
ARE YOU EVE
@ayuev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,855subscribers
+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001226431175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ayuev |
| Description | curated by Vladimir Ayuev art-director & founder at Sasha™ direct @vauev ig instagram.com/auev studio instagram.com/sasha.designstudio |
| Created | 17 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ayuev |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:51 | 12,855 | -15 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:40 | 12,870 | +2 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:10 | 12,868 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 12,870 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:15 | 12,871 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:28 | 12,879 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:10 | 12,888 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:58 | 12,887 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 12,886 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 12,888 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 12,892 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 12,890 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 12,887 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 12,890 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 12,893 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 12,891 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 12,892 | +10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 12,882 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 12,887 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 12,888 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 12,855 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,180
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (24 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,960 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,770
- Videos
- ≈120
- Links
- ≈798
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Sasha™ Design Studio Дизайн-студия с русскими корнями, работающая на мир, несколько дней назад выложили всего одну фразу без пояснений "Sasha™ Design Studio is looking for an Identity Designer cv / portfolio → [email protected]" Гляньте их сайт и поймете почему этого достаточно чтобы собрать кучу откликов. Совет 1 Для международки очень важно завести адекватную гугл почту, в которой будет удобно и называться буде…
Иметь красивый адрес почты и сайт с работами, конечно, важно. Но тут недостаточно контекста. Есть ещё немало всего — инвестиции в своё имя и имя студии в долгосрочном периоде
statue x-ray
Компания BSTN в сотрудничестве с FAT International Racing, ведущим игроком в современном автоспорте, создала эксклюзивный Porsche 911 Dakar для кампейна новых кроссовок AIR JORDAN XI 'LEGEND BLUE'
Channel photo updated
В сети очень много контента про ai-продуктивность: Claude собирает презентации, GPT пишет контент-планы и реализует их без вашего участия. Но у всей этой ai-позитивной повестки есть обратная сторона — workslop. Этот термин впервые прозвучал в Harvard Business Review год назад. Workslop — это ai-сгенерированная работа, которая выглядит законченной и профессиональной, но по существу оказывается поверхностной или недос…
Какой лучше?
- Старый48%
- Новый52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Обновляем?
Seiko x Cabane de ZUCCa — Dashboard Mini / Ref. Y151 / 2002
Серый это новый чёрный
В пятницу был просмотр в Центральном Университете у наших с Ваней Величко студентов. Фантазировали на тему плакатов и иконографики к Зимней Олимпиаде 2030 в модернистском стиле. Получилось много красоты. В комисии был чудесные Ксюша Перминова (Way Studio) и Аида Пачева (Арт-директор коммуникаций в Яндекс 360)
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ayuev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой лучше?
- Старый48%
- Новый52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@sortofdesign · 12,47913 postsГРАФДИЗЩ®
@alkali_design · 10,8016 postsЩёлочь®
@sholotch · 26,0185 postsОАО «красивые люди»
@kpacu8o · 46,7593 postsФРИЛАНСИКИ
@polyaluzjob · 60,1783 posts3DЩ®
@alkali_3d · 3,8681 postСОБЫТИЯ Щ®
@alkali_events · 2,6111 postduo sapiens*
@duosapiens · 15,0741 postГрибоедов
@interkvass · 1391 postOAO «Beautiful People»
@kpacu8ostudio · 12,5751 postКРУТО
@krutofestival · 5,5291 postлöша
@loshaalosha · 1991 postСПОРТ КЛУБ Щ®
@nenavizhubeg · 1,2881 postЗОЯ
@yfcnz1111 · 8061 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@designsniper · 27,989
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
@posterino · 57,032
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 August 2026
@visualmove · 29,685
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@cyrillicdesign · 34,412
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
@magazine_design · 23,865
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
@hsedesign · 18,843
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
@bbe_jobs · 25,562
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
@neohota · 49,561
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@bbe_school · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
@desprod · 25,637
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
@sholotch · 26,018
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@paradigm_graphics · 34,204
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
@polyaluzjob · 60,178
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
@intelligentdsgners · 24,888
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
@awdee · 33,195
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
@wtfont · 129,051
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@photozhir · 21,661
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
@designdealer · 85,834
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@design_jobs_uxui · 26,659
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
@artlebedev · 22,030
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
@scannedfashion · 19,248
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
@abcletters · 32,490
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
@mutimdigital · 29,943
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
@sber_devices · 22,104
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARE YOU EVE” (@ayuev), 12,855 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayuev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.