Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 68 days, net -135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,636–6,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 15:37
6,656
-17
6 Oct 2026, 05:20
6,673
-11
29 Sept 2026, 05:57
6,684
-13
19 Sept 2026, 00:21
6,697
-15
14 Sept 2026, 08:41
6,712
-7
10 Sept 2026, 12:18
6,719
-19
5 Sept 2026, 15:21
6,738
-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:36
6,743
-3
29 Aug 2026, 07:33
6,746
-3
26 Aug 2026, 10:44
6,749
-7
23 Aug 2026, 21:16
6,756
-8
20 Aug 2026, 03:46
6,764
-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
6,766
-9
9 Aug 2026, 19:32
6,775
-11
6 Aug 2026, 13:50
6,786
-5
5 Aug 2026, 18:41
6,791
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 27 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20m 38s
Average length
20m 38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
90
41.1%
😁
58
26.5%
🔥
46
21.0%
👍
25
11.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @duiux. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 September 2025 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы ищем крутого продакт-дизайнера в команду Blink
Если тебе хочется проектировать смелые дизайн-решения, делать не как у всех и быть на приколе вместе с нами, то эта вакансия для тебя.
Но для начала нам важно лишь это:
⁃ От 2-х лет опыта в продуктовом дизайне.
⁃ Есть опыт проектирования под iOS, Android, Web и можете показать свои кейсы в портфолио.
⁃ Обладаете насмотренностью и интересом к современным трендам в…
Спортивное приложение Any Distance выложили в опенсорс свои фичи. Можно что-то забрать к себе в проект https://www.spottedinprod.com/blog/any-distance-goes-open-source
работаешь дизайнером, но не понимаешь, как расти дальше?
мы постоянно сталкиваемся с этим запросом и хотим поговорить с вами об этом на встрече 26 марта в 19:00 (gmt+3) «что прокачивать дизайнеру в 2026»
разгоним
• где дизайнеры чаще всего упираются в потолок и какие навыки помогают двигаться дальше
• какие навыки сложнее всего прокачивать
• как продолжать учиться и прокачивать скиллы
кто будет
илона саркисова –…
Паттерны и стандарты
Внезапно поймал себя на мысли, что продукты, которые пытаются отказаться от каких-то паттернов (стандартов), рано или поздно возвращаются к ним.
Допустим, ты — какой-то мессенджер, который хочет быть не как все на рынке, и вот ты решаешь отказаться от видимых меток времени в сообщениях. Спрятать их под свайп или другой жест. Сначала это кажется прикольным и уникальным, но спустя время ты понима…
Почему на Android весь софт такой не красивый в отличии от ios?
Сегодня искал себе музыкальный плеер для прослушивания луслес музыки и ничего нет симпатичного на уровне той же яндекс музыки, но она про стриминг.
Андроид, где дизайны?
Да, я наконец-то добрался до Cursor и своего старого пет-проекта по генерации случайного градиента https://astract.github.io/
За пару минут добавил возможность сохранять предыдущий градиент с возможность откатиться к нему.
Вайбкодинг — это сила конечно.
Ребята из Додо выкладывают в своём канале видео про создание дизайн-системы.
И вот в этом видео я открыл для себя, как менять шрифт через переменные Фигмы. И в целом показано, как можно переключать платформу через заданные значения переменных.
P. S. Обожаю эту магию в Фигме на переменных и автолейаутах
Это выпуск про автосвитчер между платформами 💔
Вы просили — Никита записал. Пожалуйста, не скупитесь на лайки и респекты в комментариях — чувак делает лекции в свое свободное время.
PS коммент про микрофон уже в работе
#НикитапроДС
Расскажите, кто нибудь из вас дизайнеров использует в своей работе Cursor? И если да, то как используете и для чего?
Ищу кейсы в которых он мог быть полезен в повседневной работе
👍8😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @duiux. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Designdealer @designdealer · 86,451 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
UI/UX Designer @uxidesign · 20,606 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Now How Channel @nowhow · 24,492 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 September 2026
Дайджест продуктового дизайна @pdigest · 49,280 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Дизайн-переводчик @design_translator · 20,762 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
Secret Design @secretd · 22,273 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Оди @awdee · 33,414 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Figma Design @figmadesign · 105,616 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
UX Notes @uxnotes · 23,625 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
СПNЗЖУ DESIGN @thedesigner · 29,754 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
UX Horn 🌀 @uxhorn · 21,362 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
ParaGraph @paradigm_graphics · 34,623 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
Поясни за UX @poyasnizaux · 20,006 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Telegram Designers @designers · 70,981 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
Дизайнер, привет @jun_hi · 23,453 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Design Awards @design_awards · 21,790 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Kostya Gorsky’s Channel @desprod · 25,747 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
дизайнерс.сайты @cyrillicdesign · 34,729 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 September 2026
Адовый UX @uxfromhell · 50,343 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Intelligent Design @intelligentdsgners · 25,146 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Job for Designers @fordesigner · 24,930 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
дизайнерс @dsgners · 19,243 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dui” (@duiux), 6,656 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duiux.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.