9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -80. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,193–28,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:57
28,206
-14
11 Aug 2026, 11:18
28,220
-26
10 Aug 2026, 09:21
28,246
-27
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
28,273
-17
8 Aug 2026, 09:12
28,290
+15
7 Aug 2026, 08:25
28,275
-13
6 Aug 2026, 10:20
28,288
+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:01
28,286
no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:54
28,286
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.1%
avg views ÷ 28,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
29 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
581,400
Reactions total
8,154
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,230
Videos
≈269
Links
≈1,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
35m 15s
Average length
35m 15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,911 reactions across 28 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,647
33.5%
👍
2,483
31.4%
😁
709
8.96%
🔥
335
4.23%
🗿
266
3.36%
🤯
253
3.20%
🥴
251
3.17%
👏
178
2.25%
😐
164
2.07%
😢
125
1.58%
💔
117
1.48%
😭
55
0.695%
💯
48
0.607%
😱
43
0.544%
🙏
41
0.518%
🤔
36
0.455%
😨
29
0.367%
😍
25
0.316%
❤🔥
18
0.228%
🤩
15
0.19%
13 further kinds
73
0.923%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 29 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daneshagahi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
این موضوع بنزین 87000 تومبانی کوچکترین چیزی هست که از اثر محاصره خواهیم دید، همونطور که بارها تاکید کردم، در این مرحله، جنگ هیچ کاربردی نداره، قدرت محاصره و ردیابی اقتصادی چند صد برابر اثرگذار هست.
البته تقریبا 1 سال پیش گفتم و تازه مقامات گروهک جمهوری اسلامی و حتی خود ترامپ داره به این موضوع اذعان می کنند.
⚠️ آپدیت: بعد از ارزیابی واکنش جامعه، الان خبر دادن که قرار نیست اجرا بشه😊
خواهیم دید چه خواهد شد.
@danesha…
همچنین، در خصوص مذاکرات با ایران، ایران باید مسئولِ خسارات و مرگومیرِ تحمیلشده به مردم لبنان، سوریه، یمن و غزه باشد! رئیسجمهور دونالد جِی. ترامپ
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117072424154442498
وقتی یوزرنیم و پسورد اکانت رو از جواد ونس میگیری میدی به آقا روبیو...
@daneshagahi
میبینم که نمایندگان جمهوری اسلامی ایران دارند برای خساراتی که در طول درگیریِ نظامیِ پنجماههی اخیر به آنها وارد شده درخواست غرامت میکنند (درگیریای که شروع شد چون، آنها سلاح هستهای نخواهند داشت)، با وجود اینکه هرگز در هیچیک از مذاکرات یا جلسات ما کوچکترین حرفی از آن به میان نیامده بود! اما ایده جالبی است، چون حالا من هم متقابلاً از ایران درخواست غرامت میکنم، برای تمام آدمهایی که آنها با بمبهای کنار جادهای…
دوستان مکرر پیام میدن در مورد اتفاقاتی که افتاده و اینکه الان رهبرنامعلوم گروهک جمهوری اسلامی، رضایی کرده نمایندهی خودش در شعام و الان دبیر هم شده چرا چیزی نمیگم😐 جدی تعداد زیاد پیام دارم ها...
📍به احترام دوستان نظر خودم رو نقل قول میکنم از زبان مستشار، پرسید شغل
بیخودالملک دیلمی چی هستش؟
گفتن رئیس مستعمرات همایونی هستند!
گفت مگه ما مستعمره داریم؟
گفتند بله، همین فرانس و عثمانی و اِفریقا...
@daneshagahi
حجم دادهها، رفتارهای تعاملی و اخبار و جریان دادهها بسیار زیاد، پر از برهمکنش و پر از نویز هست.
قضد داشتم امروز بنویسم که باز هم امروز با کلی دادههای مختلف روبهرو شدیم.
الان میتونم بگم واقعا هر لحظه وضعیت پارامترهای آشوب داره پیچدهتر و در هم تنیدهتر میشه. گفتن هر حدس و گمانی واقعا اشتباه هست چون پر از نویز هست شرایط.
ولی خروجی هر مدلی رو نگاه میکنم، ناپایداری شدید میبینم.
@daneshagahi
این پیمان، برای امروز گروهک جمهوری اسلامی و حتی آینده بعد از این گروهک برای سرزمین ایران خطرناک هست، هر کدوم از یک زاویه، در موردش خواهم نوشت...
@daneshagahi
منتظر هستم ببینم که مجلس نمایندگان هم طرح سناتور گراهام برای تحریم نفت روسیه و جمهوری اسلامی رو تصویب میکنه که ترامپ امضا کنه یا نه، که اگر این اتفاق بیافته در کنار چند مسئله ی خیلی مهمی یکی دو روزه رخ داده حتما یک مطلب خواهم نوشت.
📍خب الان چک کردم، مجلس نمایندگان در تعطیلات هست و احتمالا میره برای یک ماه دیگه، با این فرض یک ماه دیگه و اینکه با توجه به تصویب قاطع سنا، فرض رو بر تصویب میگیرم و خواهم نوشت.
@daneshag…
من نمی فهمم واقعا چه افتخاری در سرعت پخش اخبار هست که این جماعت کانالهای فارسی زبان، بدون سواد، بدون دانش، بدون توانایی بررسی صحت، سعی میکنن فقط بگن ما اول زودتر جفنگیات رو گفتیم، حالا مثلا یک ساعت دیرتر جفنگ منتشر کنید، چی میشه؟
آها ملت خجسه از کانال تون کم میشن میرن کانال بغلی که زودتر جفنگ میگه.
یک فرایند اداری برای درخواست بازبینی توسط شرکت فلای بغداد تو OFAC در جریان بوده، احتمال زیاد بعد از گفتگوی اخیر نخست و…
رئیس جمهور دکتر-پزشک-جراح گروهک جمهوری اسلامی در مورد تاریخسازان دیماه سرزمین ایران گفته که یک عدد 3000 رقمی رو سی-چهل هزار علام کردم که نشون میده که چقدر نامرد هستند.
یه کد نوشتم که یه عدد 3000 رقمی تولید کنه هنوز اجراش تموم نشده، یه وب سایت درست میکنم عدد 3000 رقمی رو توش قرار میدم ببینید این نامردها چقدر اون عدد رو کوچک کردن.
@daneshagahi
رهبری ایران به طرز غیرقابلباوری فریبکار است! آنها درخواست جلسه میکنند، بعضیها میگویند «التماس» میکنند، گفتگوها شروع میشود، با برنامهریزیهای بیشتری که برای آیندهی بسیار نزدیک انجام شده، و بعد علناً و با افتخار میگویند که هیچ گفتگویی ندارند، که درباره هیچچیزی صحبت نمیشود، و فقط با «عمان» در ارتباطند. بعدش به همان اراجیف همیشگیشان ادامه میدهند و میگویند که تنگه هرمز با قدرت توسط آنها اداره خواهد شد، در …
❤143👍65🥴41👏5🗿4💯3🤩3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @daneshagahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@daneshagahi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 22,600 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 331,376 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانش، آگاهی” (@daneshagahi), 28,206 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daneshagahi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
