Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
17,000 average views per post against 28,319 subscribers — an engagement rate of 60.0%. Across the 5,225 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.77% and 13.3%, with a median of 6.49%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
33 of 39 published in the window (0 exact, 33 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
561,010
Mature posts only
62.2% over 31 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,101–28,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:18
28,319
+20
16 Sept 2026, 08:37
28,299
+1
14 Sept 2026, 16:55
28,298
+57
13 Sept 2026, 05:01
28,241
+11
11 Sept 2026, 04:40
28,230
+35
8 Sept 2026, 06:16
28,195
-3
5 Sept 2026, 03:58
28,198
-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
28,203
-2
1 Sept 2026, 23:55
28,205
-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:06
28,206
+12
30 Aug 2026, 18:35
28,194
+6
29 Aug 2026, 19:54
28,188
+27
28 Aug 2026, 21:34
28,161
+5
27 Aug 2026, 19:38
28,156
+22
26 Aug 2026, 16:24
28,134
-12
25 Aug 2026, 14:03
28,146
-10
24 Aug 2026, 12:26
28,156
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:07
28,157
+1
21 Aug 2026, 11:37
28,156
+20
20 Aug 2026, 12:15
28,136
first reading
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
60.5%
avg views ÷ 28,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,100
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
83 (26 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
548,310
Reactions total
11,039
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,250
Videos
≈271
Links
≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
35m 54s
Average length
17m 57s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,097 reactions across 76 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,127
48.3%
👍
5,851
23.3%
😁
1,491
5.94%
🔥
1,059
4.22%
💔
714
2.84%
👏
657
2.62%
🤯
366
1.46%
🗿
339
1.35%
🥴
288
1.15%
😍
246
0.98%
💯
231
0.92%
😐
217
0.865%
😢
207
0.825%
😭
178
0.709%
🤔
151
0.602%
❤🔥
142
0.566%
👌
139
0.554%
🙏
139
0.554%
😨
84
0.335%
💘
64
0.255%
15 further kinds
407
1.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,329
across the posts below
Posts paid on
32
of 77 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
1,010
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daneshagahi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
تا الان 150 دلار برای تهیه اشتراک نشریه بسیار ارزشمند The Information توسط همراهان خارج از کشور جام جمشید دونیت شده.
نیمی دیگه از هزینه سالیانه هنوز نیاز هست.
دوستان قصد دارم که نشریه بسیار ارزشمند The Information رو به سیستم جام جمشید اضافه کنم، برای اشتراکش نیاز به مشارکت دوستان خارج از کشور هست.
اگر به حدنصاب برسه مبلغ دونیشن اضافه خواهم کرد.
https://buymeacoffee.com/soroushsarabi
اگر همین امروز صنعت توسعه ی هوش مصنوعی متوقف بشه، جهان بعد از این ترکیب جهان بسیار متفاوتی خواهد بود
Opus 5.5 + Deepseek Flash 4.1 + ASTRA 6 + JEV
این ترکیب واقعا غیرقابل کنترل هستش.
دنبال آدم فضاییهای از آندرومدا نباشید، این ترکیب، همین امروز میتونه جهان جدیدی بسازه.
@daneshagahi
بعد از این پیام اتفاقات بسیار جالبی رخ داد در گروه برای این دوستمون که بسیار خوشحال کننده بود، پیامهای بسیار زیادی رو هم دریافت کردم که خیلی ابعاد سختی رو دوستان دارن پشت سر میزارن از منظر شرایط.
پاسخم به همه ی دوستان همون صحبتم به این دوستمون هست...
اما یک نکتهی بسیار مهم که باید بهش خیلی توجه کنید.
در مجموعه داستانهای هریپاتر، در مجموعهی زندانیآزکابان، زندان مخوف لرد تاریکیوسیاهی اسمش زندان آزکابان بود. …
پاسخم به این دوست عزیز در گروه خصوصی که به درخواست دوستان اینجا هم قرار میدم
هوم شما امید دارید؟:)
خوشبحالتون:)
کاش منم هنوز امیدمو داشتم. وقتی قرار بود بعد از دفاعم از این خراب شده برم و حالا اوضاع اینجوره و مجبورم دکتری هم همینجا ادامه بدم:)
شاید بخواید درآمدم رو بدونید. درآمدم صفره. هیچ جا بهم کار نمیدن. هر چی میخورم از دلار هاییه که دو سال پیش خریدم.
مدرک تست داف زبان آلمانی دارم. و TTC دارم. دکتری شیمی دارویی ش…
همزمان با درگیر ویتکاف با عباس آقا، در جهان موازی آنتروپیک با اوپوس ۵.۵ در حال نبرد با اوپن ai با gpt 6 سول هست...
هر دو در کمتر از یک ساعت پیش جهان پردازش هوش مصنوعی رو دگرگون کردند...
https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-6-sol-and-luna
https://www.anthropic.com/claude-opus-5-5
@daneshagahi
امروز عباسآقا با ویتکاف دیدار کرده و مفاد آپدیت شدهی تسلیمنامه رو دریافت کرده.
با توجه به توضیحاتی که اینجا دادم، قطعا با مجوز رهبر نامعلوم گروهک جمهوریاسلامی بوده و باید مفاد تسلیمنامه رو جهت تایید برگردونه.
ترامپ یک فرصت کوتاه بهش داده برای جواب نهایی.
فرودگاه بغداد، فردوگاه مسقط و کل کشور آذربایجان پروازهای گروهک جمهوریاسلامی رو ممنوع کردند.
@daneshagahi
#موقت
اگر قصد یادگیری و آموزش زیر ساختی در حوزه ی بازاهای مالی رو دارید، تاکید میکنم آموزش، می تونید مطالب دکتر یزدانی رو پیگیری کنید، حداقل حجم بسیار زیادی از آموزش ها به شکل رایگان در اختیارتون هست، به جرات نفر اول مباحث بازارهای مشتقهی ایران هستند و از اونجایی که دکترای تخصصی ریاضی دارند دیگه معلوم جدا از فهم عددی چقدر من خودم دوستشون دارم.
بعدا هم در مورد کارهای مشترکمون خواهم گفت😍
@salmanyazdani
https://t.m…
یکی از دوستان پکیج واکسیناسیون ابدیشون رو در مقابل اکثر جهشهای ایدئدلوژیک فرستادن که بسیار جذاب بود، گفتم شما هم این پکیج واکسیناسیون رو ببینید و در لذتش شریک بشوید...
@daneshagahi
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @daneshagahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@daneshagahi edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دیالکتیک علمی @ScientificDialectics · 24,277 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Science Magazine @science_magazine · 22,122 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند @homosapiensfa · 43,950 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری) @FarazTed · 20,586 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
کانال علمی بیگ بنگ @big_bangpage · 39,158 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor @PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 38,077 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei @drsargolzaei · 35,789 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
I am Zeus @zeus110 · 23,154 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
جامعهشناسی @iransociology · 37,496 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Instrumentallist (موزیک لایت) @instrumentallist · 30,994 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Science Documentaries مستندهای علمی @Documentary20 · 23,094 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
Radio Relax @RadioRelax · 327,183 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam @mehrsasharoleslam · 36,581 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دانش، آگاهی” (@daneshagahi), 28,319 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daneshagahi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.