#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۶۱ ): باهوش بودن یک نفرین است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

Channel
مالیخولیا
@Malixuliya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,365subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001053656755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Malixuliya |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Malixuliya |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 1,365 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 1,367 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 1,371 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 1,372 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 1,375 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,377 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 1,375 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 1,366 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 1,369 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 1,371 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 1,368 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,369 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:49 | 1,369 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Poll, posted without a caption
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۶۰ ): زندگی معنادار، زندگیای نیست که پاسخ همهٔ پرسشها را یافته باشد؛ بلکه زندگیای است که انسان بداند برای چه چیزی حاضر است مسئولیت بپذیرد. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
.#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۵۹ ): آزادی یعنی دیدن امکانهایی که میدان بستهٔ زندگی از تو پنهان کرده است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۵۸ ): بسیاری از چیزهایی که حقیقت مطلق میپنداریم، فقط نتیجهٔ میدان محدودیاند که در آن زندگی کردهایم. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۵۷ ): از منظر پوزیتیویسم منطقی، پرسش از واقعیت متافیزیکیِ علیت و وجود جهان مستقل از هر تجربهٔ ممکن، چون فاقد معیار تحقیقپذیری تجربی است، نه کاذب، بلکه از نظر شناختی بیمعنا تلقی میشود. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
#جنونهای_نخنما: ۱۲۵۰: آگاهی در میدان، از طریق نشانهها در فرایندها مداخله میکند و بدینوسیله مسیر تعین معنا را دگرگون میسازد. ۱۲۵۱: نشانه، شرط تعین فرایندهای آگاهانه است. ۱۲۵۲: فرایندهای آگاهانه از طریق نشانهها تحقق مییابند. ۱۲۵۳: نشانه بخشی از خودِ فرایند است، نه صرفاً ابزاری برای توصیف آن. ۱۲۵۴: کنش آگاهانه، افزودن یا حذف نشانههایی است که مسیر فرایند را تغییر میدهند. ۱۲۵۵: هیچ فرایند انسانی بدون میان…
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۷ ): علیت، ساختار تعین میان فرایندهاست، نه میان اشیاء. #جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۸ ): علت و معلول، رابطهٔ میان دو «چیز» نیست؛ بلکه رابطهٔ میان دو «شدن» است. #جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۹ ): جهان از اشیا ساخته نشده، بلکه از فرایندها ساخته شده است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۵ ): خدا در علم نه با انکار، بلکه با گسترش تبیینهای علّی به حاشیه رانده شد. #جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۶ ): خدا در تاریخ علم، نه قربانیِ نفی، بلکه قربانیِ ازدیادِ تعین بود. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۴ ): نه زندگی سراغم میآید و نه مرگ. من مردی از اهالی برزخم. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
به کانال دلنوشتههام سری بزنید. @zibku وارد شدید! اما خبری از نوشته نیست. بله شما با دیوانهای طرف هستید که نوشتههاش و مینویسه اما بعد از چند روز حذفش میکنه. پس بمونید که بتونید بخونید.
#جنونهای_نخنما ( ۱۲۴۳ ): زمان، درمانکنندهی همهی زخمها نیست؛ گاه تنها فرسایش را عمیقتر میکند. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Malixuliya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iranisair · 29,319
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@Evin_khabar · 154,164
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مالیخولیا” (@Malixuliya), 1,365 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Malixuliya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.