Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مالیخولیا

Channel

مالیخولیا

@Malixuliya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,365subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053656755
TypeChannel
Username@Malixuliya
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Malixuliya

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3651,3771,3715 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,368 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,371 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,366 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,375 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,377 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,375 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,372 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,371 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,367 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,365 subscribers5 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,363–1,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:171,365-2
12 Sept 2026, 13:151,367-4
8 Sept 2026, 04:211,371-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:081,372-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:431,375-2
21 Aug 2026, 08:431,377+2
18 Aug 2026, 16:421,375+9
16 Aug 2026, 03:041,366-3
12 Aug 2026, 03:111,369-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:521,371+3
6 Aug 2026, 11:501,368-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:001,369no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:491,369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈22 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۶۱ ): باهوش بودن یک نفرین است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈36 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۶۰ ): زندگی معنادار، زندگی‌ای نیست که پاسخ همهٔ پرسش‌ها را یافته باشد؛ بلکه زندگی‌ای است که انسان بداند برای چه چیزی حاضر است مسئولیت بپذیرد. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈23 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

.#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۵۹ ): آزادی یعنی دیدن امکان‌هایی که میدان بستهٔ زندگی از تو پنهان کرده است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈20 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۵۸ ): بسیاری از چیزهایی که حقیقت مطلق می‌پنداریم، فقط نتیجهٔ میدان محدودی‌اند که در آن زندگی کرده‌ایم. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈18 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۵۷ ): از منظر پوزیتیویسم منطقی، پرسش از واقعیت متافیزیکیِ علیت و وجود جهان مستقل از هر تجربهٔ ممکن، چون فاقد معیار تحقیق‌پذیری تجربی است، نه کاذب، بلکه از نظر شناختی بی‌معنا تلقی می‌شود. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما: ۱۲۵۰: آگاهی در میدان، از طریق نشانه‌ها در فرایندها مداخله می‌کند و بدین‌وسیله مسیر تعین معنا را دگرگون می‌سازد. ۱۲۵۱: نشانه، شرط تعین فرایندهای آگاهانه است. ۱۲۵۲: فرایندهای آگاهانه از طریق نشانه‌ها تحقق می‌یابند. ۱۲۵۳: نشانه بخشی از خودِ فرایند است، نه صرفاً ابزاری برای توصیف آن. ۱۲۵۴: کنش آگاهانه، افزودن یا حذف نشانه‌هایی است که مسیر فرایند را تغییر می‌دهند. ۱۲۵۵: هیچ فرایند انسانی بدون میان

5 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC≈25 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۷ ): علیت، ساختار تعین میان فرایندهاست، نه میان اشیاء. #جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۸ ): علت و معلول، رابطهٔ میان دو «چیز» نیست؛ بلکه رابطهٔ میان دو «شدن» است. #جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۹ ): جهان از اشیا ساخته نشده، بلکه از فرایندها ساخته شده است. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

5 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈26 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۵ ): خدا در علم نه با انکار، بلکه با گسترش تبیین‌های علّی به حاشیه رانده شد. #جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۶ ): خدا در تاریخ علم، نه قربانیِ نفی، بلکه قربانیِ ازدیادِ تعین بود. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

4 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC≈44 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۴ ): نه زندگی سراغم می‌آید و نه مرگ. من مردی از اهالی برزخم. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

4 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈41 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

به کانال دل‌‌نوشته‌هام سری بزنید. @zibku وارد شدید! اما خبری از نوشته نیست. بله شما با دیوانه‌ای طرف هستید که نوشته‌هاش و می‌نویسه اما بعد از چند روز حذفش می‌کنه. پس بمونید که بتونید بخونید.

4 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈49 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#جنون‌های_نخ‌نما ( ۱۲۴۳ ): زمان، درمان‌کننده‌ی همه‌ی زخم‌ها نیست؛ گاه تنها فرسایش را عمیق‌تر می‌کند. © ( کاف. آ ) ♾ @Malixuliya

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Malixuliya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ایرانگردی | سفر | گردشگری
@iranisair · 29,319
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,367
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
🔴اخبار جنگ | آزادی | اِوین
@Evin_khabar · 154,164
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مالیخولیا” (@Malixuliya), 1,365 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Malixuliya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.