Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کتابسار

Channel

کتابسار

@ketaabsaar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,495subscribers

-106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001351279593
TypeChannel
Username@ketaabsaar
Descriptionمعرفی کتاب در حوزه های علوم تجربی،انسانی،اجتماعی، تکامل(فرگشت)،مغز و علوم اعصاب، آگاهی،خطاهای شناختی و ادراکی، اقتصاد رفتاری،تفکر نقادانه،ادبیات و‌ رمان..و فایلهای از دکتر مکری،مقالات و گزیده کتاب صوتی https://t.me/+yQluACuhZRA2NjBk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ketaabsaar

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,48410,60210,54310,4956 August 202612 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,466–10,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 16:5610,495-2
9 Nov 2026, 00:5810,497+2
7 Nov 2026, 18:4710,495-2
6 Nov 2026, 18:3010,497+3
5 Nov 2026, 21:3110,494-4
4 Nov 2026, 23:1610,498-3
4 Nov 2026, 00:4510,501+1
3 Nov 2026, 03:2110,500+5
2 Nov 2026, 06:1110,495+7
1 Nov 2026, 08:1710,488-1
31 Oct 2026, 08:2810,489-2
30 Oct 2026, 06:4610,491-12
29 Oct 2026, 10:0010,503-12
28 Oct 2026, 08:2810,515-6
27 Oct 2026, 08:1610,521-1
26 Oct 2026, 06:2910,522-2
25 Oct 2026, 06:3410,524-8
24 Oct 2026, 08:5510,532+3
22 Oct 2026, 07:2010,529-2
19 Oct 2026, 22:1510,531first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.50%
avg views ÷ 10,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
787
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held56 (26 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total4,724
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 22:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,000
Videos
≈227
Links
≈2,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
25m 12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC321 viewsread 13 November 2026

دوستان علاقمند به کتابهای صوتی، در صورت تمایل می توانید از محتوای کانال زیر استفاده کنید. https://t.me/audiobookdrug

Signed Sara

10 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC439 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @evolution_iranFile

🎙 پادکست ادیسه انسان 🔗 در کست‌باکس @evolution_iran

Signed Sara

3 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC863 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @parsehpodcastVideo

ما معمولاً زندگی را با چند ایستگاه اصلی تعریف می‌کنیم: تولد، بلوغ، ازدواج و مرگ. اما هزاران سال در تاریخ بشر، یک ایستگاه دیگر هم وسط این خط وجود داشت؛ طوری که چرخهٔ طبیعی زندگی برای بخش بزرگی از انسان‌ها «تولد، آبله، بلوغ و مرگ» بود. بیماری ترسناکی که بیرون از زندگی روزمره نبود، بلکه خودِ زندگی روزمره، ازدواج، زیبایی، بازار کار و حتی تصمیم برای فرستادن بچه‌ها به مدرسه را شکل می‌داد. آبله خانواده را در برابر یک تضاد…

Signed Sara

31 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

در این سخنرانی از رویداد "TELSI SCIENCE TALK 21" با موضوع "ژن خودخواه، انسان فداکار!" آذرخش مکری، روان‌پزشک و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، با عنوان "وقتی دیگری سود می‌برد" به بررسی یکی از پیچیده‌ترین جنبه‌های روان‌شناسی اجتماعی انسان می‌پردازد. ایشان با مرور پژوهش‌های علمی و ارائه مثال‌هایی از روابط انسانی، محیط‌های کاری و تعاملات اقتصادی، مفاهیمی همچون برابری‌خواهی، ذهنیت حاصل‌جمع صفر، ذهنیت ضد سود و ریش…

Signed Sara

31 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 13 November 2026
File

بخشی از سخنرانی آذرخش مکری در رویداد "TELSI SCIENCE TALK 21" با موضوع "ژن خودخواه، انسان فداکار!" ، با عنوان "وقتی دیگری سود می‌برد" به بررسی یکی از پیچیده‌ترین جنبه‌های روان‌شناسی اجتماعی انسان می‌پردازد.

Signed Sara

31 Oct 2026, 14:23 UTC701 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @homosapiensfaFile

🌐 لقمه (سه) ⭕️ خواب‌های پیشگویانه 😴 🔸 تجربهٔ شهودی ما می‌گوید برخی خواب‌ها «آینده» را دقیقاً دیده‌اند اما در روش‌شناسی علمی، شدتِ یقینِ فردی هیچ اعتباری ندارد. 🔸 آن‌چه ما «خواب پیشگویانه» می‌نامیم، غالباً محصول تلاقیِ سه سازوکار دقیقِ عصب‌شناختی است... ▫️ در این اپیزودِ کوتاه به پشت صحنهٔ مغز می‌رویم تا ببینیم چگونه این شعبدهٔ واقع‌گرایانه را کارگردانی می‌کند. 💬 نوشتار و خوانش: فرهاد ارکانی 🙏🏻 حمایت از این کانال…

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,200 viewsread 13 November 2026

فهرست مطالب معرفی کتاب وقتی همه می‌دانند که همه می‌دانند ۱- معرفی کتاب وقتی همه می‌دانند که همه می‌دانند ۲- کتاب وقتی همه می‌دانند که همه می‌دانند درباره چیست؟ ۳- دانش مشترک چیست و چرا «همه می‌دانند» کافی نیست؟ ۴- چرا یک جمله ساده می‌تواند همه‌چیز را تغییر دهد؟ ۵- چرا انسان‌ها این‌همه به فکر دیگران درباره خودشان فکر می‌کنند؟ ۶- روابط انسانی؛ وقتی باید هر دو بدانیم «ما چه نسبتی با هم داریم» ۷- چرا منظورمان را مس…

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC840 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

استیون پینکر درباره نویسنده دیگر آثار نویسنده @ketaabsaar

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC372 viewsread 13 November 2026

پول چرا پول است؟ 🔹یک تکه کاغذ به خودی خود ارزش چندانی ندارد. با این حال، آن را به فروشنده می‌دهید و در مقابل غذا، لباس یا خدمات دریافت می‌کنید. چرا؟ فقط به این دلیل که شما معتقدید پول ارزش دارد؟ نه. مهم‌تر این است که می‌دانید دیگران نیز آن را خواهند پذیرفت و آنها نیز می‌دانند دیگران خواهند پذیرفت. پول نمونه‌ای تقریباً کامل از قدرت هماهنگی است. 🔹همین منطق درباره بسیاری از عرف‌هایی صدق می‌کند که آن‌قدر به آنها عادت ک…

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC600 viewsread 13 November 2026

بازتاب جهانی کتاب وقتی همه می‌دانند که همه می‌دانند 🔹کتاب When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows در سال ۲۰۲۵ منتشر شد و از همان سال انتشار در چند فهرست مهم بهترین کتاب‌های سال قرار گرفت. The Economist آن را در میان بهترین کتاب‌های ۲۰۲۵ قرار داده، Bloomberg آن را در فهرست کتاب‌های مورد توجه رهبران کسب‌وکار آورده و آمازون نیز آن را در میان بهترین کتاب‌های کسب‌وکار و رهبری سال انتخاب کرده است. 🔹بازتاب‌های کتاب نیز گس…

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC467 viewsread 13 November 2026

چرا گاهی سکوت از صراحت عاقلانه‌تر است؟ 🔹ما معمولاً «صداقت کامل» را فضیلت می‌دانیم. اما آیا واقعاً باید هرچه در ذهنمان می‌گذرد به زبان بیاوریم؟ اگر از همکارمان دلخوریم، باید تمام افکارمان را بگوییم؟ اگر از رئیس خود بدمان می‌آید، آیا اعلام صریح آن بهترین انتخاب است؟ اگر در رابطه‌ای متوجه ضعفی کوچک شده‌ایم، آیا موظفیم هر بار آن را به موضوع گفت‌وگو تبدیل کنیم؟ 🔹فصل پایانی کتاب عنوانی عمداً تحریک‌کننده دارد: «صداقت افرا…

Signed Sara

12 Oct 2026, 13:38 UTC530 viewsread 13 November 2026

چرا گاهی سکوت از صراحت عاقلانه‌تر است؟ 🔹ما معمولاً «صداقت کامل» را فضیلت می‌دانیم. اما آیا واقعاً باید هرچه در ذهنمان می‌گذرد به زبان بیاوریم؟ اگر از همکارمان دلخوریم، باید تمام افکارمان را بگوییم؟ اگر از رئیس خود بدمان می‌آید، آیا اعلام صریح آن بهترین انتخاب است؟ اگر در رابطه‌ای متوجه ضعفی کوچک شده‌ایم، آیا موظفیم هر بار آن را به موضوع گفت‌وگو تبدیل کنیم؟ 🔹فصل پایانی کتاب عنوانی عمداً تحریک‌کننده دارد: «صداقت افرا…

Signed Sara

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @ketaabsaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ketaabsaar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند
@homosapiensfa · 44,392
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Absurd Mind's Media
@absurdmindsmedia · 30,575
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
فیلم های کوتاه روان شناسی
@psyshortmovies · 34,683
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
کتابخانه فراسوی دانش
@Farasoyedaneshlib · 19,479
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
انبارستان🎧
@anbar100 · 29,863
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
دکتر محمدرضا سرگلزایی drsargolzaei
@drsargolzaei · 35,609
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری
@DrAzarakhshMokri · 203,238
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
کتاب‌های کمیاب و نایاب
@freeforbiddenbooks · 47,404
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
🕊 فرازتد⚡️(روشنگری)
@FarazTed · 21,173
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 September 2026
دانش، آگاهی
@daneshagahi · 28,674
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
برترین کتابها
@bartarinbookk · 33,249
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
بوقت چای
@TimeChay · 56,554
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
نیچه و فلسفه / Theodor
@PHILOSOPHI_ZER · 33,118
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه
@ketab_mamnouee · 79,769
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
دیالکتیک علمی
@ScientificDialectics · 23,761
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
دکتر آذرخش مکری | آرشیو
@Dr_Azarakhsh_Mokri_Public_Files · 23,010
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
یافته‌های نوین روانشناختی
@Hrman11 · 24,203
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ
@Spirit_and_life · 40,558
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Sherwin Vakili (شروین وکیلی)
@sherwin_vakili · 22,232
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Science Magazine
@science_magazine · 23,125
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
vkends | مجله ایده‌ها
@vkends · 24,570
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
کتابخانه پارس
@parsslibrary · 33,866
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی
@zistboommedia · 32,730
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی تخصصی
@Psychological_Tools · 45,529
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کتابسار” (@ketaabsaar), 10,495 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ketaabsaar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.