13 measurements spanning 12 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,639–17,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:03
17,729
+10
16 Aug 2026, 04:29
17,719
-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:16
17,721
+5
13 Aug 2026, 03:45
17,716
+5
12 Aug 2026, 07:07
17,711
+1
11 Aug 2026, 08:43
17,710
+16
10 Aug 2026, 06:16
17,694
+3
9 Aug 2026, 09:11
17,691
+8
8 Aug 2026, 05:31
17,683
+12
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
17,671
+18
6 Aug 2026, 07:01
17,653
+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:17
17,651
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:34
17,651
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 17,729 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,290
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
31 (22 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
163,850
Reactions total
2,965
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,843 reactions across 29 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,147
40.3%
👍
837
29.4%
👌
520
18.3%
😢
160
5.63%
🔥
78
2.74%
👏
49
1.72%
😁
29
1.02%
😈
7
0.246%
😐
6
0.211%
🥰
6
0.211%
👎
2
0.07%
🤯
2
0.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,965reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 31 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
لغزشی از ما سر زده که نمیدانیم و یا بطرز مبهمی از آن آگاهیم: این گناه وجود ماست. همین که به دنیا آمدیم، در معرض داوری قرار میگیریم و سرتاسر زندگی ما مانند یک رشته کابوس است که در دندانههای چرخ دادگستری میگذرد. بالاخره مشمول مجازات اشد میگردیم و در نیمهروز خفهای، کسی که به نام قانون ما را بازداشت کرده بود، گزلیکی به قلبمان فرو میبرد و سگکش میشویم. دژخیم و قربانی هر دو خاموشند. این نشان دوره ماست که شخصیتی در آ…
انسان نه فقط احمقترین حیوانات است، بلکه درندهترین و شریرترین آنهاست و یا تنها اوست که حقیقتاً شریر و موذی است.
#انسان_و_حیوان
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
- این را دیگر کسی باور نخواهد کرد - از هر کسی که شنیده بودم خوشش میآمد، کشیک میکشیدم، میرفتم هزار جور خفت و مذلت بخودم هموار میکردم با آن شخص آشنا میشدم، تملقش را میگفتم و او را برایش قر میزدم میآوردم - آنهم چه فاسقهایی: سیرابیفروش، فقیه، جگرکی، رئیس داروغه، مفتی، سوداگر، فیلسوف که اسمها و القابشان فرق میکرد ولی همه شاگرد کلهپز بودند، همه آنها را به من ترجیح میداد - با چه خفت و خواری خودم را کوچک و ذلیل میکر…
شما این رجال و اعیان مملکت را نمیشناسید، من میدانم زیر دمشان چقدر سسته. مشهدی حسن خرکچی از آنها بهتر چیز سرش میشه. اما بنفع ماست که همین رجال سر کار بمانند...
#حاجی_آقا
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
هنگامیکه آزمایش سخت و دشوار زندگانی، چراغهای فریبنده جوانی را خاموش کرده، سرچشمه مهربانی خشک شده، سردی، تاریکی و زشتی گریبانگیر میگردد، اوست که چاره میبخشد، اوست که اندام خمیده، سیمای پُرچین، تن رنجور را در خوابگاه آسایش مینهد.
ای مرگ! تو از غم و اندوه زندگانی کاسته بار سنگین آنرا از دوش برمیداری.
#مرگ
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
تاکنون عقیده او راجع به مرگ این بود که زندگی مانند سیگاری است که میسوزد و زمانی که خاکستر شد اثری از آن آتش باقی نمیماند و بر فرض هم که بماند تاثیری به حال سیگار سوخته نخواهد داشت. گاهی سیگار تا ته میسوزد و زمانی نیمهکاره خاموش میشود و خودکشی بهرام این صورت اخیر را داشت...
قسمت خطخورده و حذفشده در دستنویس داستان #گرداب
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
نمیدانم تو هم معتقدی یا نه، اما از آن شبی که آینهام شکست، همان آینهای که تو خودت بمن داده بودی، قلبم گواهی پیشآمد ناگواری را میداد. روز آخری که یکدیگر را دیدیم و گفتی که بانگلیس میروی، قلبم بمن گفت که تو خیلی دور میروی و هرگز یکدیگر را نخواهیم دید.
#آیینه_شکسته
#صادق_هدایت
نه مهر فسون، نه ماه جادو کرد
نفرین به سفر، که هرچه کرد او کرد
دریچهها
مهدی #اخوان_ثالث
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
میخواهم از خود بگریزم بروم خیلی دور، مثلاً بروم در سیبریه، در خانههای چوبین زیر درختهای کاج، آسمان خاکستری، برف، برف انبوه میان موجیکها، بروم زندگانی خودم را از سر بگیرم. یا مثلاً بروم به هندوستان، زیر خورشید تابان، جنگلهای سر بهمکشیده، مابین مردمان عجیب و غریب، یک جایی بروم که کسی مرا نشناسد، کسی زبان من را نداند...
#زنده_بگور
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
آنانکه ز پیش رفتهاند ای ساقی
در خاک غرور خفتهاند ای ساقی
رو باده خور و حقیقت از من بشنو
باد است هرآنچه گفتهاند ای ساقی
#خیام
#ترانههای_خیام
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
این فکر از خودپسندی بشر سههزار سال پیش است که دنیای موهومی ورای دنیای مادی برای خودش تصور کرده، ولی بعد از آنکه جسم معدوم شد سایهاش نمیماند.
#س_گ_ل_ل
#صادق_هدایت
@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel
👌60❤24😢7👍6👏4🔥1
Signed Nooshafarin
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 190,343 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صادق هدایت” (@Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel), 17,729 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sadegh_Hedayat_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
