Channel
@SilverMercuryFest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,913subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001723483073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SilverMercuryFest |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SilverMercuryFest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 4,913 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 4,923 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 4,932 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 4,932 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,172 |
| Reactions total | 248 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
202 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 28.7% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 28.2% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 15.8% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 6.93% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 4.46% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 3.96% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.96% | |
| custom 5228955673076724136 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
26 человек на сундук мертвеца должность Рынок труда в сфере рекламы окончательно перешёл в режим «голодных игр». По данным свежего исследования hh.ru*, сфера маркетинга и рекламы возглавила топ по уровню конкуренции. ⏩️ Все подробности — в карточках. 🖤 Коллеги, а вы на себе чувствуете кадровую динамику рынка или у вас всё ещё «работы много, работать некому»? *Данные от 24 июня 2026 года
❤7
4 небанальных фильма на август ➡️ «Все везде и сразу» (2022). Владелица прачечной узнает, что в параллельных вселенных она могла стать кем угодно. Фильм вытаскивает из «замыленного взгляда» и перезагружает креативное мышление. ➡️ «Я — капитан» (2023). Фильм вдохновляет быть лидером, тем более, если вокруг один хаос. ➡️ «Конклав» (2024). Наглядное пособие, как работают коалиции. Если вы устали от переговоров, то эт…
🤩2
Какие кейсы действительно остаются в памяти? 👀 #отБосса На премии Silver Mercury каждый год можно увидеть огромное количество проектов из разных номинаций. Но проходит время и одни вспоминаются моментально, а другие постепенно теряются. Почему так происходит? Лилия Фёдорова, CEO Avantage Project, собрала несколько принципов, которые объединяют самые запоминающиеся кейсы, и продемонстрировала их на примерах проекто…
Posted without readable text
Одна строчка, написанная копирайтером в 1947 году, создала традицию, которой мы следуем до сих пор. О чём речь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Викторина: хорошо ли вы знаете историю брендов Ответы — анонимные. Проверьте себя, и ставьте реакцию, если хотите больше видеть такую рубрику.
Подборка небанальных книг на август Редакция Silver Mercury составила список книг, которые точно будут полезны в последний день лета. ➡️ Мэттью Уолкер, «Почему мы спим». Книга объясняет, что происходит с мозгом ночью и сколько надо на самом деле спать, чтобы быть эффективным. А еще вы узнаете, что нужно делать, чтобы память и внимание работали на самом высоком уровне. ➡️ Мейсон Карри, «Режим гения». Книга рассказы…
🔥2💯1
Кто в комментариях смешнее собственных подписчиков? В мире «пластиковых» ответов выигрывает тот, кто умеет шутить. В карточках — три бренда, которые делают это хорошо. 🖤 Коллеги, не забываем, что главный талант — не пошутить, а вовремя остановиться 🏆
❤9🔥6😁2
Предприниматель VS копроративный сотрудник Коллеги, сделали вам бинго 🖤 Кому жиза в глаз попала?
🔥4😁3❤2
Почему очки, которые нельзя надеть, разошлись по сторис жюри за сутки? Рассказали и показали в новой статье в блоге 🖤 Обязательно к просмотру тем, кто разбирается в стиле
🏆8🔥8custom 52289556730767241367❤1
Беззвучная реклама Yota Гениальная идея. Пока все пытаются привлечь внимание громкостью, Yota просто выключила звук. И это работает Я сначала даже подумала, что у меня что-то сломалось. Но до конца досматриваешь, из ответного уважения. Люблю такие чистые идеи — цепляет
❤10😍8🔥6🤪2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SilverMercuryFest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Одна строчка, написанная копирайтером в 1947 году, создала традицию, которой мы следуем до сих пор. О чём речь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 4,638 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Silver Mercury” (@SilverMercuryFest), 4,913 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SilverMercuryFest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.