Channel
@jolybells
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
359,983subscribers
-284 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001158535533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jolybells |
| Description | Официальный канал Алексея Шевцова. Приватка с кучей контента: https://web.tribute.tg/l/18g Предложить новость/реклама @AlexShevtsov_Bot |
| Created | 23 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jolybells |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 359,983 | -50 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 360,033 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 360,048 | -63 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 360,111 | -29 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 360,140 | -87 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 360,227 | -40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 360,267 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 360,267 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,276,300 |
| Reactions total | 251,946 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
220,985 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 122,806 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 32,176 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 26,880 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5208915922609250347 | 26,320 | 11.9% | |
| custom 6033045122222918901 | 7,393 | 3.35% | |
| custom 5463288019299605545 | 2,038 | 0.922% | |
| 🗿 | 1,752 | 0.793% | |
| 👎 | 1,620 | 0.733% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251,946reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jolybells. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Завтра на сходке с подписчкам в Барселоне покажу. Район Раваль, в 2:00 ночи. Встречаемся у пакистанского магаза с телефонами "PakiPhone". Приходите!
🤣7,120👍376custom 6033045122222918901271custom 546328801929960554551🔥38🗿32custom 520891592260925034716👎13
Я в свои 32, впервые, себе позволил ужасное – отключить рациональность! Меня многие будут осуждать – имеют право и они во всем будут правы... Но хотел! Но мог! Да и ни у кого не украл, ну в конце концов. Да! Дедовские! Вы мой возраст видели? Да! Простые, я хотел тихую классику
🔥8,520👍1,140🤣560🗿513custom 6033045122222918901344👎223custom 546328801929960554562custom 520891592260925034756
Девочки поздравляют друг друга с ДР: «Счастья, любви, исполнения всех мечт!» Мужчины:
🤣6,820🔥581👍303custom 520891592260925034792custom 603304512222291890142🗿31custom 546328801929960554520👎18
Сегодня мне 32. Честно, я весь год думал, что будет 33, но вчера впервые пересчитал 😂 Смотрите, когда близилось 30 было страшно: всё-таки тяжелый социальный прессинг, но позже стало легче. Да и когда есть чем гордиться, когда что-то даёт финансовое спокойствие, возраст ощущается сильно спокойнее. Главное - питаться хорошо. В 32 у меня ни пивного пуза, ни подбородка, ни зависимостей, как алко, так и никотиновой, по…
🔥12,700👍1,260custom 6033045122222918901528🤣89custom 520891592260925034780custom 546328801929960554539👎36🗿31
Вот чем интересен рынок США, так тем, что он в изобилии от богатых людей, готовых заплатить сколько угодно за что угодно! Ставь любую цену, главное красиво"упакуй" идею. Туалетная бумага за 80$. Покупают.
🤣5,010custom 6033045122222918901707👍223🔥81custom 546328801929960554554🗿39👎28custom 520891592260925034717
Эта лодка вчера высадилась в Великобритании. 230 человек, 15 метров лодка. Это побило предыдущий рекорд, установленный июле, когда на борт одной лодки поднялось 165 человек. Число прибывших в UK на лодках в этом году составляет 15 242 человека, это на 43% меньше по сравнению с аналогичным периодом прошлого года, но это около 60 человек в день.
custom 52089159226092503475,360🤣1,150custom 6033045122222918901456👎59👍45custom 546328801929960554533🔥26🗿22
Я переболел чванством и заносчивостью, почитал побольше, послушал умных и начал считать Ролекс пиздатыми часами. Это, очевидно, первые часы, которые купит футболист с отбитыми мячом мозгами и первый выбор успешного коуча из инсты, но за хайпом Ролекса стоит вполне себе пиздатый фундамент: история, патентованные технологии, качество: более ляма часов в год и наименьший процент брака среди других часовых домов – это а…
🤣4,830custom 5463288019299605545568👍504👎104custom 6033045122222918901101🗿49🔥47custom 520891592260925034712
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣9,090custom 52089159226092503471,160👍248custom 603304512222291890177🗿49custom 546328801929960554530🔥27👎23
По ходу Яблоко реально были оппозиционными и антивоенными. 😧
custom 520891592260925034710,100🤣2,030🔥468custom 6033045122222918901199👍124custom 546328801929960554584🗿57👎21
Задумался, что ведь наверняка есть люди, которые дали имена своим ИИ-чат ботам. Я вас не знаю, не встречал, но если вы и есть, то вы ебнутые наглухо
🤣8,080custom 5208915922609250347904🔥345👍230custom 6033045122222918901141👎96🗿80custom 546328801929960554559
Из Сиэтла привез чашку из самого первого Старбакса. Для этой точки они сделали уникальный мерч. Вообще у меня целая коллекция эксклюзивных чашек из Старбакса из разных стран, где я был. Думаю снять про них видео, коллекция-то большая.
👍5,370🔥624🤣440👎100custom 603304512222291890199🗿78custom 546328801929960554540custom 520891592260925034712
Посмотрел Человек-паука. Самый уморительный момент, что герои используют Samsung. Да, фильм в жанре фантастики, но не до такой же степени, чтобы в США у кого-то был Samsung....
🤣12,100custom 6033045122222918901692👍241🔥80🗿66👎53custom 546328801929960554549custom 520891592260925034737
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @jolybells. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 17,046 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 249 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Шевцов” (@jolybells), 359,983 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jolybells.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.