Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Ай, Как Просто!” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 329,957–330,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:03
329,993
-49
11 Aug 2026, 21:12
330,042
-43
10 Aug 2026, 21:47
330,085
-50
9 Aug 2026, 23:32
330,135
-37
9 Aug 2026, 00:51
330,172
-37
8 Aug 2026, 03:08
330,209
-23
7 Aug 2026, 05:55
330,232
+12
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
330,220
+3
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
330,217
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:26
330,217
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
61.5%
avg views ÷ 329,993 subscribers
Avg views / post
203,000
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (29 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
3,248,800
Reactions total
40,682
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10h 40m
Average length
1h 20m
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
61,042 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5197199866006089277
42,408
69.5%
🤡
15,419
25.3%
💩
3,215
5.27%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,042reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
577
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 22 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
184
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ikakprosto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кому мешает правда о блокаде? — Часть 4
В 1946-м Нюрнбергский трибунал назвал блокаду Ленинграда военным преступлением. В 2022-м российский суд — геноцидом. Почему одну и ту же трагедию оценили по-разному? И что изменилось за 76 лет?
СМОТРЕТЬ ВКОНТАКТЕ
СМОТРЕТЬ НА RUTUBE
СМОТРЕТЬ НА ДЗЕНЕ
🎙Мошенник ушёл на СВО // Google генерирует теракты // Украина потеряла море №211
СМОТРЕТЬ НА SASFLIX
СМОТРЕТЬ ВКОНТАКТЕ
СМОТРЕТЬ НА RUTUBE
СЛУШАТЬ АУДИОВЕРСИЮ
Совсем забыл с вами поделиться, да и сам, если честно, пропустил этот момент. Оказывается, что позавчера стукнуло ровно 365 дней без алкоголя. Первый год моей жизни, когда я не употреблял ни грамма спиртного: ни вина, ни пива, абсолютно ничего. И знаете, это было лучшее решение в моей жизни.
Теперь хочу отпраздновать пять лет, потому что я, конечно, не могу ничего гарантировать и не знаю, как сложится моя жизнь, но …
Друзья...это пиздец
Сегодня на Бали на мотоцикле насмерть разбился видеоблогер Дмитрий Ларин...
У нас с Димой были непростые отношения, но его ужасная смерть ввергла меня в шок...Не знаю что сказать.
Дима, хоть и был атеистом, но царство тебе Дима небесное пусть станет домом.
Покойся с миром критик, блогер, новатор...
Как вы знаете, недавно Украину номинировали на Нобелевскую премию мира. Я же считаю, что вместе с ней они могут смело получать ещё одну премию - Премию в честь великого учёного, написавшего книгу «Происхождение видов».
Кому мешает правда о блокаде? — Часть 3
Некоторые историки называют прорыв блокады случайностью, а операцию «Искра» — лёгкой победой.
Но что стоит за этой «лёгкостью»? Как готовили солдат к наступлению? И что на самом деле пережил Ленинград во вторую блокадную зиму?
СМОТРЕТЬ ВКОНТАКТЕ
СМОТРЕТЬ НА RUTUBE
СМОТРЕТЬ НА ДЗЕНЕ
В связи с бурлением говна, вызванным вырезанной из контекста цитатой Путина, я хочу процитировать Владимира Ильича Ленина: «Было бы большой ошибкой думать».
🎙WB в огне // Конченная Одиссея // Свободу Жмилевскому! №209
СМОТРЕТЬ НА SASFLIX
СМОТРЕТЬ ВКОНТАКТЕ
СМОТРЕТЬ НА RUTUBE
СЛУШАТЬ АУДИОВЕРСИЮ
custom 51971998660060892771,090🤡96💩61
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ikakprosto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 37,399 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
RuGG. Скандалы, игры, повесточка @ggscg_tg · 13,012#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Артемий Лебедев @temalebedev · 972,194 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Гарик Харламов @garbul · 168,426 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Антонов такой Антонов @auantonov · 320,771 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
SimpDungeon☠️ @grpzdc · 155,434 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Клубный Сервис @klubniy_servis · 191,371 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru) @oper_goblin · 497,493 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
[BadComedian] @TheBadComedian · 598,864 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Абу @abuwtf · 196,596 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Соляноторий @PathOfMisanthrope · 190,721 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
Бладсикер 2.0 @bIoodsiker · 212,717 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Ярдрей - юридический канал @yardrey · 165,835 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Вован и Лексус @Russiacalling · 174,820 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Крупнокалиберный Переполох @bolshiepushki · 326,042 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Жизнь насекомых @insect_life · 191,576 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Silero News (озвучка, текст в голос). @silero_voice_news · 854,848 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
КБ @cbpub · 637,809 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
AcademeG @academeg_true_original · 260,747 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Ньюсач/Двач @ru2ch · 638,608 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Дмитрий Никотин @dmitrynikotin · 685,267 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Вероника Степанова @veronikastepanova20011 · 472,958 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Александр Штефанов @alexandrshtefanov · 175,577 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
КБ. Игры @cb_games · 380,373 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
КБ. экономика @cb_economics · 344,290 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Алексей Шевцов @jolybells · 359,983 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 78 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
7 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СТАС БОМБИТ” (@ikakprosto), 329,993 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ikakprosto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.