Потенциал вселенной Гарри Поттера явно не раскрыт:
custom 526938097041856495253❤10custom 52830396750894578454custom 53841220181636291392custom 52671237976007924471

Channel
@costperlead
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
108,218subscribers
-2,851 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001664712222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @costperlead @creativeadv |
| Description | Маркетинг и медиа, какие они есть. Автор: @samiydobriy_bot Сотрудничество: @magicdennis Канал включён в реестр: https://clck.ru/3Fascq |
| Created | 29 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 129 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/costperlead |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @costperlead/14233 · this entry14 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC | @marketingducks/80814 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC | 1.00 | 2.2 hours |
| @costperlead/14254 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC | @marketingducks/86617 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC | 1.00 | 21 hours |
| @costperlead/14322 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 13:19 UTC | @marketingducks/93725 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC | 1.00 | 20 hours |
| @costperlead/14390 · this entry30 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC | @marketingducks/100430 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC | 1.00 | 1.6 hours |
| @costperlead/14441 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC | @marketingducks/10605 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC | 1.00 | 4.4 hours |
| @costperlead/14479 · this entry8 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC | @marketingducks/10898 Oct 2026, 09:46 UTC | 1.00 | 39 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @marketingducks | 55 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.3 hours | this entry (55–0) |
| @Whatmarkt | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | this entry (14–0) |
| @thepinkmoscow | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.1 hours | this entry (13–0) |
| @whymarketing | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5.0 hours | this entry (5–0) |
| @marketingfuture | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.3 hours | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 453 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @costperlead — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:44 | 108,218 | -32 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 108,250 | -23 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:51 | 108,273 | -40 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 108,313 | -29 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 108,342 | -13 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:00 | 108,355 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:04 | 108,369 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:38 | 108,375 | -23 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 108,398 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 108,408 | -19 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:50 | 108,427 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 108,444 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 108,452 | -47 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 108,499 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 108,504 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:25 | 108,527 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:38 | 108,530 | -30 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 108,560 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:50 | 108,563 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 108,577 | first reading |
610 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 610 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,311,620 |
| Reactions total | 29,178 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 163 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105,829 reactions across 606 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269380970418564952 | 46,740 | 44.2% | |
| ❤ | 15,189 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5283039675089457845 | 9,302 | 8.79% | |
| custom 5384122018163629139 | 7,420 | 7.01% | |
| custom 5300866228909273138 | 7,062 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5267068392522675695 | 4,641 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5269758437914342057 | 3,280 | 3.10% | |
| custom 5193036131435839671 | 3,077 | 2.91% | |
| custom 5379803978303290314 | 2,887 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5276102306474010164 | 2,173 | 2.05% | |
| custom 5201761920138382729 | 1,381 | 1.30% | |
| 😭 | 684 | 0.646% | |
| custom 5267123797600792447 | 575 | 0.543% | |
| custom 5242400638700134915 | 353 | 0.334% | |
| custom 5192790609630365741 | 247 | 0.233% | |
| custom 5305369364680189966 | 152 | 0.144% | |
| custom 5359538291081249948 | 151 | 0.143% | |
| custom 5192995964901687510 | 129 | 0.122% | |
| custom 5224708023435404637 | 72 | 0.068% | |
| custom 5192877277775430941 | 71 | 0.067% | |
| 7 further kinds | 243 | 0.23% |
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 608 of the 610 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 610 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @costperlead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 610 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 163 posts held from the last 30 days (8.59%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Потенциал вселенной Гарри Поттера явно не раскрыт:
custom 526938097041856495253❤10custom 52830396750894578454custom 53841220181636291392custom 52671237976007924471
Италию накрыл «дождь» из… птичьего помета — проблема повторяется ежегодно в Риме из-за осенней миграции скворцов. Под удар попадают тротуары, автомобили и дороги. Люди берут с собой зонты, а журналисты бегут снимать необычные репортажи. Местные жалуются на неприятный запах и постоянное пение птиц по вечерам, а автомойки начинают брать дополнительную плату за работу. Столица мира с нюансом 🤌
custom 526938097041856495249custom 538412201816362913915❤3custom 52830396750894578453custom 52671237976007924472custom 52017619201383827291
Безработный 29-летний китаец начал зарабатывать миллионы рублей в месяц на нейровидео с котами. Бывший копирайтер год не мог найти работу, поэтому взял все в свои руки: начал пилить нейрослоп и за полгода набрал 1,7 млн подписчиков с более 500 млн просмотрами. У него нет команды, работает он лежа на диване, а для роликов использует лишь Word, CapCut и ИИ-генератор. Теперь он живет на рекламные интеграции — по его с…
custom 526706839252267569575custom 526938097041856495220custom 53008662289092731387❤6custom 51930361314358396713custom 53841220181636291393
В соцсетях завирусилось видео, в котором прямо во время трогательного момента на свадьбе фоном пролетает (!) дирижабль с рекламой GTA VI. Теперь комментаторы говорят, что от маркетологов Rockstar невозможно спрятаться — они будут преследовать буквально везде. Красиво-агрессивный подход.
custom 526938097041856495284❤10custom 53008662289092731385custom 53841220181636291393custom 52830396750894578452
Мобильный оператор вышел на распродажи 11.11 с неожиданным посылом. Баннеры QIQ, нового бренда связи, призывают даже в сезон скидок покупать только то, что действительно нужно. Так компания показывает свою главную идею — минимализм во всем. Приложение QIQ устроено как переписка с ИИ, и тариф вместе с остальными настройками можно поменять в одной диалоговой строке. Шах и мат, рекламисты 😁
custom 526938097041856495233❤13custom 52830396750894578459custom 51930361314358396716custom 53008662289092731383custom 53841220181636291392
Компании по всему миру пошли навстречу сотрудникам и объявляют 19 ноября выходным — во время выхода GTA VI работникам разрешают оставаться дома и даже оплачивают компьютерный клуб. Тренд уже становится массовым: • Logitech даст 7000 сотрудникам дополнительный выходной в день выхода игры. • БлинБери и СушиВёсла разыгрывают среди сотрудников оплачиваемый выходной в компьютерном клубе. • Завод из Пензы обещал дать оф…
custom 526938097041856495265custom 530086622890927313816❤12custom 53841220181636291394custom 52830396750894578453
Тем временем Тим Кук приехал в Стамбул, зашел на местный базар и купил ковер за… 1,5 млн рублей. Турки в комментариях пишут, что продавцы с рынка заскамили Кука, продав ковер в 10 раз дороже его обычной цены — так же, как Apple продает свою технику 😀 В следующем году он вернется за ковром в новом цвете.
custom 5269380970418564952179custom 538412201816362913920custom 530086622890927313810❤7custom 52830396750894578454
Вселенная захлопнулась на этом моменте.
custom 5269380970418564952200custom 526712379760079244723custom 530086622890927313814custom 52830396750894578454custom 53841220181636291394custom 52017619201383827291
В GTA VI может появиться русский рэп — Big Baby Tape выложил в ТикТок сниппет из офиса Rockstar. Ранее его заметили у офиса Rockstar вместе с Yung Lean, после чего появилась фанатская теория о том, что в игре появятся песни на русском языке. Запикивание и цензура тоже будет? 👌
custom 526706839252267569565custom 519303613143583967122custom 526712379760079244712custom 53008662289092731389❤6custom 53841220181636291395
Киркоров стал наглядным примером общего состояния к концу году — артист выступил в Тюмени в очень странном энергосберегающем стиле, после чего зрители потребовали вернуть деньги за концерт. Сам Филипп Бедросович ответил, что выступал с температурой, а затем добавил: Я отдал всё, что смог. Когда хотел на больничный, но попросили посидеть на удалёнке.
custom 526938097041856495296custom 538412201816362913947custom 51930361314358396719❤5custom 52671237976007924474custom 52830396750894578452
Ору: Didenok создали кота-бота «Директора по атмосфере», который следит за вайбом в рабочих чатах. 😼😼😼😼 😼😼😼😼 😼😼😼😼 😼😼😼😼 Кота нужно просто добавить в чат, после чего он ведет себя как базовый коллега: может прислать рандомный мем или начать шутить в ответ на сообщения про дедлайны, созвоны, правки и отпуск. Ещё есть фичи в духе предсказаний и выбора «главного мученика чата»: того, кого тегали чаще всех за месяц. Н…
custom 526938097041856495261custom 530086622890927313819custom 520176192013838272916❤8custom 53841220181636291396custom 51930361314358396711
Россияне всё чаще превращают своих животных в блогеров, чтобы не работать — за год количество пушистых рилсмейкеров в Москве увеличилось на (!) 45% и превратилось в массовый тренд. Самые популярные варианты — блог от имени кота или собаки. Далее идут экзотические животные, ящерицы, крысы и попугаи. Схема простая и проверенная: снимаешь видосики, набираешь аудиторию, ждешь рекламные предложения. Кто-то даже продает …
custom 526938097041856495258custom 528303967508945784517custom 520176192013838272912❤5custom 51930361314358396715custom 53841220181636291391
Showing the 12 most recent of 610 posts we hold for @costperlead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@costperlead edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 177 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг нефильтрованный” (@costperlead), 108,218 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/costperlead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.