Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net -259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110,771–111,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:54
110,810
-36
12 Aug 2026, 05:33
110,846
-17
11 Aug 2026, 16:15
110,863
-19
11 Aug 2026, 08:47
110,882
+7
10 Aug 2026, 19:16
110,875
-22
10 Aug 2026, 10:05
110,897
-17
9 Aug 2026, 22:21
110,914
-21
9 Aug 2026, 13:01
110,935
-18
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
110,953
-25
8 Aug 2026, 10:16
110,978
-20
7 Aug 2026, 20:20
110,998
-23
7 Aug 2026, 10:50
111,021
-22
6 Aug 2026, 21:14
111,043
-10
6 Aug 2026, 09:47
111,053
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:41
111,053
-16
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
111,069
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.08%
avg views ÷ 110,810 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,840
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
64 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
501,960
Reactions total
10,424
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,190 reactions across 62 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5269380970418564952
4,784
46.9%
❤
1,766
17.3%
custom 5283039675089457845
931
9.14%
custom 5384122018163629139
651
6.39%
custom 5300866228909273138
612
6.01%
custom 5269758437914342057
497
4.88%
custom 5267068392522675695
431
4.23%
custom 5359538291081249948
151
1.48%
custom 5193036131435839671
123
1.21%
custom 5276102306474010164
116
1.14%
custom 5201761920138382729
68
0.667%
custom 5429358555050318769
60
0.589%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 64 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @costperlead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Люди по всему миру начали копить на выгорание — это новый «финансовый тренд», который важнее накоплений на пенсию, свадьбы и другие вещи.
По сути это та же финансовая подушка, но с конкретикой: если ты выгорел, можешь уйти с работы в любой момент и спокойно отдохнуть, чтобы не стало хуже.
При этом не обязательно «быть молодым». В статье приводится пример 54-летней женщины, которая забила на пенсию и решила подстрах…
История дня: москвичка уехала в отпуск и оставила свою машину во дворе — в итоге 43-летний прохожий-темщик взял и продал её автомобиль.
Мужчина заметил, что Лексус долго стоит без движения, сделал поддельные документы, вызвал эвакуатор и увез в Тверь.
После этого он смог продать его скупщикам за 3 млн рублей, но был пойман — ему грозит уголовка, а машину уже вернули хозяйке.
Вот тебе и долгий отпуск 👀
На Авито цены летят вниз — продавцы начали резко снижать цены на новые и ресейл-товары, а скидки на отдельные товары доходят до 80%.
Всему виной распродажа «Хватамба»: распродается практически всё, от одежды и кроссовок до электроники и мебели. Фейковых ценников не будет — за честностью скидок следит умный алгоритм Авито, который сразу отсеивает искусственные накрутки.
Если ждали знак, то это он.
⚡️Показываю первые фото корн-догов и шариков васаби во «Вкусно — и точка» из нового Азиатского меню — коллеги пригласили меня на дегустацию, делюсь с вами ❤️
Сразу лайфхак от шефа: корн-доги можно макать в соус (лучше кисло-сладкий), а затем в хрустящие шарики. А ещё так можно сделать с креветками, тоже огонь.
Особый Супербокс в коллабе с Genshin Impact можно будет купить с 17 августа — туда сразу входят Корн-доги …
Российские удаленщики заканчиваются — в стране осталось (!) меньше миллиона людей, полностью работающих в дистанционном формате.
Бóльшая часть оставшихся — специалисты высшего уровня, остальных же переселяют в офисы или переводят на гибридный формат.
К цифрам:
• По итогам прошлого года количество удаленщиков сократилось на 21,8% и составило 968 тысяч человек против 1,238 миллиона в 2024 году.
• Эксперты же ставят …
Златопуста Локонса в новом «Гарри Поттере» сыграет актер Николас Холт — звезда фильмов «Безумный Макс: Дорога ярости», «Люди Икс», «Супермен», «Тепло наших тел» и т.д.
Первый сезон ждем уже в конце декабря 🍿
⚡️Яндекс Пэй удален из российского App Store — проверил, ссылка не открывается.
Ранее приложение уже пропадало, но только с в зарубежных регионах.
А можно другие сервисы не сносить? 👀
Российский бренд TiM создал протеиновую (!) воду — в одной такой банке содержится 15г белка.
Сам напиток создан без добавления сахара, на вкус ощущается похожим на газировку, а производители рекомендуют его вместо «тяжелых шейков».
Теперь ждем протеиновый воздух 😂
ChatGPT может составить про вас анекдот — в соцсетях рассказали, что после этого он анализирует все чаты и начинает насмехаться над вашими частыми просьбами.
Для этого нужно вбить простой промт:
Составь анекдот про меня на основе наших переписок
Пользуйтесь, смейтесь, но не обижайтесь 😎
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @costperlead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,272 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Москоуавто @moscowauto · 205,367 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
коллеги, не сутультесь @bardachko · 567,567 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Ты в тренде или уходи @trendsetter · 1,312,175 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
ок, согласовано @notypicmarketing · 353,758 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Сегодня в тренде @trends · 1,114,868 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
о чём говорят коллеги @kollegi · 157,287 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Трендач @trendach · 1,492,505 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
КудаМосква @kudamsk24 · 232,927 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Русский ритейл и бизнес @retailrus · 293,568 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugnotfeature · 852,053 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
CodeCamp @codecamp · 183,094 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
в IT и выйти @techmedia · 1,352,710 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Артемий Лебедев @temalebedev · 972,194 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
TrendWatching @trendwatching24 · 1,473,361 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
Рестарт @remedia · 732,645 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
concertzaal @concertzaal · 840,211 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Эксплойт @exploitex · 2,057,246 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 August 2026
бумеры смотрят телек @boomers_TV · 162,616 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Техномотель @technomotel · 2,606,130 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 August 2026
Naked Science @nsmag · 193,936 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED @wylsared · 1,096,087 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
СберБизнес @sberbusiness · 246,742 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Типичная Москва @moskva_only · 1,264,485 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Романцев768 | Romancev768 @Romancev768 · 758,072 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг нефильтрованный” (@costperlead), 110,810 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/costperlead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
