Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for stasprostoklass

Channel

stasprostoklass

@stasprostoklass

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,511subscribers

-368 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000674599
TypeChannel
Username@stasprostoklass
DescriptionСотрудничество: @nastasee РКН №7204678246
Created24 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stasprostoklass

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,51132,87932,6956 August 2026 — 32,879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,879 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,867 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,865 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,863 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,859 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,854 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,853 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,844 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,832 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,829 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,823 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,814 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,813 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,812 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,811 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,795 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,788 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,771 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,770 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,774 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,771 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,765 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,758 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,752 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,750 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,733 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,720 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,711 subscribers9 September 2026 — 32,677 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,655 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,637 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,612 subscribers17 September 2026 — 32,591 subscribers25 September 2026 — 32,511 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -368. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,456–32,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 04:2132,511-80
17 Sept 2026, 06:0032,591-21
15 Sept 2026, 05:3932,612-25
13 Sept 2026, 15:5932,637-18
11 Sept 2026, 23:3832,655-22
9 Sept 2026, 16:1532,677-34
6 Sept 2026, 07:1832,711-9
3 Sept 2026, 23:4132,720-13
2 Sept 2026, 11:2432,733-17
1 Sept 2026, 13:2432,750-2
31 Aug 2026, 09:5332,752-6
30 Aug 2026, 09:1932,758-7
29 Aug 2026, 12:2732,765-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:3632,771-3
27 Aug 2026, 13:3332,774+4
26 Aug 2026, 16:0532,770-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:3832,771-17
24 Aug 2026, 12:3232,788-7
22 Aug 2026, 19:4832,795-16
21 Aug 2026, 13:1832,811first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 32,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,780
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held26 (16 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total52,960
Reactions total1,772
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,190
Videos
≈328
Links
≈168

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,036 reactions across 26 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,54930.8%
🤣1,33026.4%
🔥63412.6%
😁62112.3%
🎉2975.90%
❤‍🔥1943.85%
👍1392.76%
💯761.51%
🌭350.695%
👏340.675%
🍓300.596%
💘240.477%
😱200.397%
💔150.298%
😭120.238%
💋70.139%
🥰70.139%
🤝40.079%
✍20.04%
👌20.04%
2 further kinds40.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,036 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 26 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stasprostoklass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,460 views198 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Какавы горы! Скажижи?

🔥131❤32😁23💘7💯3🌭1🤣1

26 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,080 views23 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤23

26 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,960 views35 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤25🔥10

24 Sept 2026, 04:52 UTC≈3,220 views164 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Прикольная идея для всех, кто пользуется общественными туалетами: смывать за собой! Реально прикольная штука, кстати.

😁98💯55👍7🤝4

23 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,450 views61 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

У детства есть свой набор вкусов, и он у многих подозрительно одинаковый: пломбир в вафельном стаканчике, сгущёнка, кукурузные палочки, глазированный сырок. Эти продукты не то чтобы вызывают ностальгию — они просто никуда не делись. Ты ел их в десять лет и с тем же удовольствием покупаешь сейчас. На днях у одного из этих вкусов обнаружилась вполне взрослая биография: РостАгроЭкспорту, который выпускает в том числе те…

❤42👍10🔥9

20 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈4,220 views176 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Душевно сгоняли на родину Софика — в Краснодар. Сходили в парк Галицкого (нереальный), поели котлет у бабушки с дедушкой и потанцевали на свадьбе 🖤

❤‍🔥90❤68🥰7🔥6👍2💘2🌭1

17 Sept 2026, 06:48 UTC≈5,130 views254 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Соня опять бесплатно полетела куда-то

🤣209❤28😁6🌭5🔥3💘2❤‍🔥1

15 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈5,250 views205 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня мы хотим сказать всем людям одну новость: Жим-жим челлендж теперь закончен с Сережей. Мы делали много отжиманий вместе. Это было хорошее время и хорошая сила. Теперь больше нет жим-жим челленджа. Теперь мы просто друзья. Я желаю Серёже хорошей жизни, здоровья и сильных рук. Спасибо всем, кто смотрел наши отжимания и был рад за нас. Дружба продолжается. Жим-жим закончен теперь. Спасибо.

❤130🤣40👍24🌭4🔥4❤‍🔥3

13 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC≈4,790 views60 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Вопрос к собачникам. А почему в рунете нет ни одного объявления вот с такой жесткошёрстной таксой именно вот такого цвета и именно с такой шерстью? Она какая-то уникальная? Есть ощущение, что и на улице я таких не встречал. Кто знает?

❤52💘7❤‍🔥1

12 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC≈4,260 views98 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁58🤣29🔥10👍1

12 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈4,110 views71 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥42😁22🍓5❤2

10 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈4,540 views42 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Сводил своих пацанов во вторую баню Siberia в Москве. В первой — той, что на Марьиной Роще — был много раз и поэтому очень хотелось посмотреть на их новый проект. Ну что ж, ничего неожиданного — кайфанули максимально! Держат планку ребята, молодцы. Конкретно мы были в отделении Искер — оно подходит для больших компаний. Если соберетесь — мягкого вам пара!

❤19🔥13❤‍🔥6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @stasprostoklass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,618
#1
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 285,492
#2
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#3
Mash
@mash · 3,110,586
#4
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 855,067
#5
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#6
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390
#7
Дудь
@yurydud · 862,341
#8
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,820
#9
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 575,554
#10
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#11
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#12
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,978
#13
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 740,982
#14
Ксения Бородина
@borodylia0803 · 911,782
#15
Krasnova_Natasha
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,162
#16
Роскошь бутиков
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,752
#17
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 306,163
#18
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,356
#19
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,326
#20
ЮЛИЯ МЕНЬШОВА
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 358,222
#21
Караван Ахуительных Историй
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,816
#22
Алеся Петровна
@alesiapetrovna · 140,033
#23
MYAGKOVA IRINA
@irinamyagkov · 28,797
#24
Мадам Kака
@madam_kaka_allo · 51,323
#25
ПАВЕЛ КЕЙК
@cakepavel · 39,554
#26
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,393
#27
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎
@MinogarovaNews · 95,041
#28
Не последние люди в городе
@neposlednielyudi · 57,679
#29
Ароматная Сауна
@aromasauna · 38,997
#30
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 196,482
#31
ЖЕНСКИЙ ФОРУМ
@zhenforum · 171,503
#32
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 154,461
#33
СКЕТЧУП
@sketchup_parfenyuk · 129,256
#34
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,724
#35
Караван Бьюти Ченэл
@fursanastasia · 47,741
#36
Личное о Наличном
@zhidkovskiy_fashion · 67,290
#37
МАША.СТОРИЗ
@mashastories1 · 119,243
#38
ROGOV
@rogov24 · 189,279
#39
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,525
#40
Цыпкин/Tsypkin
@tsypkintherealone · 101,706
#41
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 38,117
#42
Дай Откусить
@dauotkysit · 271,838
#43
I’m CEO, beach
@imceobeach · 65,613
#44
Душниловка
@dusnilaparty · 107,805
#45
Зоя Яровицына
@zoyazooo · 44,867
#46
Вшивая интеллигенция
@vshivaya_intelligenciya · 51,995
#47
Вика Дмитриева
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 265,719
#48
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,691
#49
Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 236,764
#50
олдскульный маркетинг
@marketingold · 124,179
#51
Илья Варламов
@varlamov · 236,744
#52
Вадяо
@vadim_telega_rush · 269,992
#53
Скажи Гордеевой
@skazhigordeevoy · 112,412
#54
КАТЯШМАТЯ
@katyashmatya · 8,128
#55
Ирина Хакамада
@chillosophy · 150,131
#56
Сообщение от Кравцовой
@Kkkrem_daily · 65,202
#57
СИТУАСЬЁН 🖤
@mr_batsuev · 10,581
#58
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630
#59
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#60
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#61
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,952
#62
Мишкины Рассказы
@mishkastories · 1,379
#63
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 576,732
#64
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 134,107
#65
КРУГИ НА ПОЛЯХ
@kruginapole · 607,261
#66
Московские новости
@mnews_ru · 200,406
#67
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,271
#68
Nation Geographic
@NationGeographic · 325,560
#69
Дневник Лауры Д
@Lauradjagadiary · 76,370
#70
Клиент
@yourtypicalclient · 47,664
#71
Милая моя
@tatakalnitskaya · 75,533
#72
Микерина. Роды? Зови акушера!
@mikeryna_sashaa · 189,517
#73
Sveta Bondarchuk
@lovepeacesvet · 54,356
#74
Король Бубей
@beburprime · 53,396
#75
A L E K Ó
@aleko_n17 · 102,738
#76
madgoroskop
@madgoroskop · 30,159
#77

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

sola_monova
@sola_monova · 65,923
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Сергей Бурунов
@sergeyburunovofficial · 63,182
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Ева Власова
@evavlasova · 27,604
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
Света Марсель
@sveta_marsel · 189,462
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
Galabob
@galabob_telegram · 81,025
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“stasprostoklass” (@stasprostoklass), 32,511 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stasprostoklass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.