Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТС

@tihonsm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,985subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001672801228
TypeChannel
Username@tihonsm
DescriptionПродуктовая розница и все такое Канал с короткими видео – https://youtube.com/@TihonSmirnov Канал с длинными видео – https://www.youtube.com/@tihonsm Для связи (рекламу не размещаю): @SmirnovTihon
Created16 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tihonsm

Growth

41,95741,98541,9716 August 2026 — 41,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,961 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,964 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,963 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,966 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,973 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,979 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,985 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,953–41,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:4441,985+6
12 Aug 2026, 01:1241,979+6
11 Aug 2026, 00:4541,973+7
9 Aug 2026, 22:1141,966+3
8 Aug 2026, 23:0141,963-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:2141,964+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:5041,961+4
6 Aug 2026, 10:0041,957no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5941,957first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.4%
avg views ÷ 41,985 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,000
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total175,100
Reactions total5,356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
378
Videos
212
Links
80

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 31s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

32,841 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,43628.7%
😁5,48716.7%
🔥5,28616.1%
🤯4,21412.8%
❤‍🔥2,7998.52%
🤬2,2156.74%
🤔1,9736.01%
💯1,2493.80%
😈1820.554%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,841reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
560
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
265
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tihonsm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈21,000 views914 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Яндекс Лавка кафе. Меню на 700 позиций. Сильно больше любого кафе и крайне мало для магазина. Некий гибридный формат. Буквально вот вчера смотрел интервью с основателем DDX, где он говорит, что по будням обедает в Милти. Если грубо, это такие островки в ТЦ с готовыми блюдами. Не надо ждать, как в обычном общепите и при этом ассортимент вполне себе. Естественно, в ресторанах или дома будет вкуснее, но тут же вопрос

👍566🤔203❤‍🔥53🔥30😁29🤬18🤯10😈5

31 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈35,500 views897 reactions4 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Самое удачно решение в 2026 – это перенос компаний в Китай. Утро не начинается с проверки новых прилетов, у сотрудников нет нервного тика от новостей, курс валют какой-то неадекватно выгодный, налоги умеренные, а товары на российские маркетплейсы поставляем вообще с нулевой комиссией. Да, формально комиссия есть, но она полностью компенсируется Озоном. Напомню, мы продаем кресла. На РФ у нас эксклюзив. Такие же моде

🤔402😁240🔥140👍73❤‍🔥20🤬14😈6🤯2

31 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC≈32,100 views610 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

новый ролик про неказистую судьбу сетевого маркетинга https://youtu.be/CDL-NZ4_L4Y

🔥420👍107❤‍🔥62🤔7🤯6💯4😁2😈2

24 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈50,900 views1,872 reactions9 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Скорее всего, как и предполагали, WB отдадут ВТБ. Как только маркетплейс подойдет достаточно близко к банкротству, то, естественно, утонуть ему не дадут, но останется вопрос – кто заберет. Вариантов очень ограниченное количество. Записывают ролики вместо того чтоб делом заниматься. Устанавливать конские комиссии, брать плату за логистику, за хранение, за каждую поставку (продавцы официально платят деньги, чтоб на с

🤬965💯510🤔145👍97🤯53😁47🔥36😈18

23 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC≈35,600 views1,063 reactions18 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Яркая, но короткая жизнь. Думаю об этом. Даже близко не осознаем на какое количество жизней влияем. Насколько сильно наши действия могут трансформировать общество, а слова запускать в людях механики, которые делят их жизни на до и после. Горят склады, стоят очереди за бензаком, на носу мобилизация и осенний чебурнет, а почему-то смерть Вадима как-то в моменте все это оттеснила на периферию. Как сказал классик «какая

🔥570👍193❤‍🔥109💯68🤯53🤔45🤬11😁11

9 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈47,600 views1,419 reactions39 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

на канале вышло видео про следующие сферы интересов Китая

❤‍🔥796🔥349👍226🤯29😁10🤔9

5 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC≈61,000 views1,225 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

С 2024 года Швеция предлагает 350000 крон (2,8 млн руб) «легальными иностранным жителям», которые согласятся добровольно покинут страну. Просчитались, но где?

😁970🤔162😈39🔥21👍16🤬6🤯5💯4

2 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈59,600 views1,007 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

ладно, вот вам не такой скучный контент РОБОТЫ ОТНИМАЮТ У НАС РАБОТУ! (грит подайте на зарядку)

😁866👍67🤯42❤‍🔥10🤔7🔥5💯4🤬4

2 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈44,400 views953 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Несколько интересных тезисов из отчета про возвраты в штатах: – Покупатели в возрасте от 18 до 30 лет в среднем оформили 7,7 возврата онлайн-покупок за последние 12 месяцев – это больше, чем представители любого другого поколения. – 9% всех возвратов являются мошенническими. – Почти половина покупателей (45%) считает допустимым обходить правила при возврате товаров. Покупатели используют ИИ, что создать поддельны

🔥450👍236🤬111🤔63💯39😈20😁19🤯15

28 Jun 2026, 10:08 UTC≈46,200 views1,820 reactions14 Starsread 13 August 2026

Люди ненавидят ИИ В the economist взяли 25 ИИ-моделей и прогнали их через World Values Survey. Такой опросник про мораль и убеждения. Его с 1981 используют на живых людях. Хотели понять, а какие, собственно, ценности зашиты в моделях. Выяснилось, что ИИ радикальнее, чем средний житель любой страны из этого опроса. Журнал приводит работу Дэвида Розадо из Новой Зеландии. Товарищ прогнал 24 чат-бота через 11 разных те

👍1,140🔥253🤔217💯103😁59❤‍🔥24🤬12😈12

26 Jun 2026, 11:34 UTC≈40,000 views2,569 reactions41 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В 2018 году начал писать в Яндекс Дзен. Одному из первых подключили тогда монетизацию. Сначала писал редко, но потом разогнался и стал выдавать по одной статье в день. Это начало приносить не просто удовольствие от создания микро-комьюнити, но и какие-то деньги. Дальше пришлось освоить съемку фото/видео, чтоб увеличивать количество контента. Без ИИ невозможно было как сейчас за минуту сгенерировать текст или фото. П

👍1,720🔥392💯193😁123🤔79❤‍🔥28🤯19🤬11

26 Jun 2026, 06:40 UTC≈38,900 views773 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В комментариях регулярно интересуются про запись звука – на фото весь сетап. При этом если только собираетесь что-то купить, то берите sennheiser 600. Топовое цена/качество. Еще и питание есть встроенное.

👍549🔥150❤‍🔥44😈11🤔7😁6🤯4💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tihonsm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 150,484 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 292,992
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТС” (@tihonsm), 41,985 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tihonsm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.