Добровольцы, волонтеры и военкоры Русской Весны действуют в боевых порядках войск на Донбассе, Украине и САР, получая информацию из самых горячих точек.
РКН: clck.ru/3Fj3hJ
Связь: @rvvoenkor_bot
youtube.com/@rusvesna.su3499
Created
30 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Военкоры Русской Весны” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 26 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 4,970 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5,703. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,463,199–1,470,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:18
1,464,054
-220
11 Aug 2026, 07:27
1,464,274
-177
10 Aug 2026, 04:31
1,464,451
-4,390
9 Aug 2026, 02:21
1,468,841
-719
8 Aug 2026, 02:07
1,469,560
-94
7 Aug 2026, 03:14
1,469,654
-61
6 Aug 2026, 05:40
1,469,715
-42
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
1,469,757
first reading
Engagement
5,206 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 397 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 1,464,054 subscribers
Avg views / post
192,000
1,259 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,259
of 5,206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
5,206 (13 April 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
241,867,010
Reactions total
4,681,804
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,100
Videos
≈49,900
Links
≈72,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 28m
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 256 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (3 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 218of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 72.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 181,000 views — 12.4% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 190,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
3.0 hours: 104,000 → 6.0 hours: 125,000still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
73 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
970,826 reactions across 272 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
305,179
31.4%
🤣
191,665
19.7%
🔥
176,486
18.2%
🤬
118,366
12.2%
🙏
56,509
5.82%
❤
54,067
5.57%
👎
26,228
2.70%
🤷♂
17,700
1.82%
😢
10,384
1.07%
🫡
5,097
0.525%
😱
4,803
0.495%
🤯
1,986
0.205%
❤🔥
1,869
0.193%
🕊
487
0.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,736,658reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
536
across the posts below
Posts paid on
190
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rvvoenkor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
184,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
192,000
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqw3i2VX
1
22 July 2026
22 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
‼️🇷🇺🏴☠️Ужесточение миграционной политики в ХМАО сократило приток иностранцев в регион, а преступность среди мигрантов снизилась в 4 раза.
▪️По словам губернатора Руслана Кухарука, власти совместно с правоохранительными органами реализуют план по стабилизации ситуации. За 2025 год выдача видов на жительство упала на 34%, разрешений на временное проживание — вдвое, а число поставленных на миграционный учет сократилос…
‼️🇷🇺📈Экономика России успешно преодолела спад начала года и вернулась на траекторию уверенного роста
▪️Об этом пишет Bloomberg, фактически подтверждая статистикой слова министра экономразвития РФ Максима Решетникова.
▪️ По предварительной оценке Росстата, ВВП во втором квартале 2026 года вырос на 1,3% после падения на 0,2% в первом квартале. В целом за первое полугодие совокупный рост составил 0,6%.
▪️ Главными факт…
‼️🇷🇺⚡️Идёт массированная атака врага на Севастополь: после удара город временно обесточен
➖«Наши военные, авиация, ПВО и мобильные огневые группы отражают массированную атаку ВСУ. В результате атаки врага на нашу энергетическую инфраструктуру город временно остался без электроснабжения», — сообщил губернатор Развожаев.
▪️На объектах введен особый режим, специалисты оценивают масштаб повреждений и делают всё возможно…
‼️🇺🇦🏴☠ Ситуация в Киеве ухудшается с каждым днем после серии ударов по складам
▪️Украинские СМИ продолжают публиковать новые кадры пустых полок в киевских супермаркетах после ударов по складам крупнейших торговых сетей.
▪️Проблема наблюдается и в других городах центральной Украины.
⚠️Подписаться на RV: MAX | t.me/RVvoenkor
🇷🇺🔥🇸🇪 Армия России уничтожила шведский боевой катер, суда и портовую инфраструктуру врага
▪️В течение дня высокоточным оружием воздушного базирования и ударными БПЛА поражены:
▪️ в порту Черноморск – резервуары с ГСМ и объекты портовой инфраструктуры, используемые для разгрузки и хранения грузов военного назначения;
▪️ в порту Одесса – сухогруз с военным имуществом, оборудованный средствами РЭБ, и танкер с топливом …
‼️🇺🇦🇺🇸ВСУ разгромили бронетанковую бригаду США, — WSJ
▪️Во время маневров в Германии американцы вводили в бой бронемашины, которые поднимали большое количество пыли, поэтому украинские дроноводы быстро обнаруживали бронетехнику и условно «уничтожали» их.
▪️Причем ВСУшники делали это настолько быстро, что американцам приходилось буквально «возрождать» уничтоженные подразделения — возвращать их в сценарий как новые си…
‼️🇺🇦🏴☠Зеленский поддержал партию "Яблоко" 🤦♂
▪️Наркофюрер снова выступил в поддержку прозападных либералов, заявив, что Путин якобы "боялся увидеть на выборах единственную антивоенную партию "Яблоко", поэтому он просто снял ее с выборов".
▪️В последние дни украинские пропагандисты очень активно поддерживают "яблочников", называя их единственной "хорошей" партией в России.
⚠️Подписаться на RV: MAX | t.me/RVvoenkor
‼️🇷🇺В Москве дорогие и современные, в регионах — что Бог пошлёт: волонтёры СВО пожаловались в ЛДПР на подход к обеспечению протезами
Высокотехнологичные протезы значительно облегчают жизнь нашим бойцам, однако доступны они по большей части в Москве и крупных городах. Волонтёры СВО на форуме «Влияй на власть с ЛДПР» передали жалобы участников спецоперации.
Как выяснилось, несмотря на рост производства и создание цел…
‼️🇷🇺СВО закончится или приостановится только на условиях России — Медведев
▪️Зампред Совета безопасности России также заявил о необходимости уже сейчас планировать дальнейшее развитие и модернизацию предприятий военно-промышленного комплекса.
▪️ВПК сейчас вносит существенный вклад в рост российской экономики благодаря высокому спросу на выпускаемую продукцию.
▪️При этом в перспективе структура спроса может изменитьс…
‼️🇺🇦🌾Экспорт украинского зерна резко сократился на фоне ударов Армии России по портовой инфраструктуре
▪️В первые 12 дней августа Украина значительно снизила объемы экспорта основных зерновых культур на фоне ударов по портовой инфраструктуре и осложнения работы морских маршрутов.
➖Пшеница — 175 тыс. тонн против 759 тыс. тонн годом ранее, снижение в 4,3 раза.
➖Ячмень — 37 тыс. тонн, что в 5,6 раза меньше показателя а…
‼️🇷🇺🇱🇹 Литва направит около €50 млн на противотанковые рвы у границ с Россией и Беларусью
▪️Литва планирует расширить систему фортификационных сооружений вдоль границ с Россией и Беларусью. На строительство противомобильных рвов и сопутствующие мероприятия в 2026–2030 годах предполагается выделить около €50 млн.
▪️Основной ров планируется выполнять шириной около 20 метров от патрульной дороги вглубь территории.
▪️На…
🇵🇱🖕🇺🇦Главный спонсор Starlink для Украины - Польша грозит прекратить оплачивать услуги компании
▪️На днях SpaceX исключила Польшу из европейского региона связи для пользователей терминалов Starlink, не назвав причины.
➖"Эй, Илон Маск, крутой парень, прекрати дискриминировать польских пользователей Starlink, либо мы можем передумать платить $50 млн в год за твои услуги", — заявил глава МИД Польши Сикорский.
⚠️Подписа…
🤣2,500👍278❤71🤷♂51🔥36🤬13❤🔥5👎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 5,206 posts we hold for @rvvoenkor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@rvvoenkor edited 18 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 757 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 328 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rvvoenkor named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@special_authors named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@radio_sputnik named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,682,871#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Работайте, братья! @btr80 · 146,888 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Воин DV @voin_dv · 146,901 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Репортёр Руденко V @RtrDonetsk · 156,492 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Сводки и Аналитика СВО (Резерв) @rezervsvo · 206,263 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Оперативные сводки @opersvodki · 409,487 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
МИГ России @mig41 · 476,334 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Военный Осведомитель @milinfolive · 615,498 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Минобороны России @mod_russia · 631,789 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺 @voenacher · 668,207 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Colonelcassad @boris_rozhin · 743,768 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
СИЛОВИКИ 🇷🇺 @SIL0VIKI · 184,947 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Апти Алаудинов «АХМАТ» @AptiAlaudinovAKHMAT · 204,276 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Тринадцатый. @Z13_Separ · 219,137 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
🇷🇺⚡️Сводки ополчения Новороссии Z.O.V. (ДНР, ЛНР, Украина, Война) @swodki · 222,631 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
ANNA NEWS @anna_news · 236,537 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR @dontstopwar · 245,328 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺 @notes_veterans · 296,229 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Белорусский силовик @belarusian_silovik · 451,078 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко @mikle1on · 491,919 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Украина.ру @ukr_2025_ru · 494,517 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
Zлой Пруф️ @proofzzz · 602,662 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Сладков+ @sladkov_plus · 700,975 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,682,871 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 August 2026
Правовой вестник СВО @pv_svo · 170,191 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 288 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Militärflugplatz Myrhorod(de.wikipedia.org) “…dabei verloren die Ukrainer eine Su-27.{{Internetquelle |url=https://t.me/RVvoenkor/74675 |titel=Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны |abruf=2024-08-15}}…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны” (@rvvoenkor), 1,464,054 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rvvoenkor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
