Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +332. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 407,881–408,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:25
408,315
-90
11 Aug 2026, 11:57
408,405
+268
10 Aug 2026, 08:41
408,137
+10
9 Aug 2026, 07:53
408,127
-31
8 Aug 2026, 05:52
408,158
-14
7 Aug 2026, 09:21
408,172
+223
6 Aug 2026, 09:31
407,949
-34
6 Aug 2026, 00:42
407,983
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:14
407,983
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.0%
avg views ÷ 408,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
176,000
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
29 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
5,095,900
Reactions total
145,374
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,060
Videos
≈714
Links
≈816
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 18s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
107,909 reactions across 22 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
83,210
77.1%
❤
24,699
22.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145,374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
343
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 29 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @panchenkodi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
10 друзей Арестовича
Вы наверное думали, что главное, чем знаменит Арестович - тем, что регулярно отрекается от собственных слов и убеждений. Но не только от них! Но и от людей, которых еще вчера называл друзьями.
Теперь Арестович заявил, что больше не будет выходить в эфир с Юлией Латыниной.
Арестович рассорился со всеми своими «друзьями» по эфирам:
- поссорился с Щелиным
- поссорился с Фейгиным
- поссорился с Г…
Байдужi тварюки.
Певица Оля Полякова вдруг обнаружила, что в Украине к людям относятся как к скоту. А люди превращаются в запуганных мышей и «равнодушных тварей»
В этом видео прекрасно все. 2 базарные бабы, 2 хабалки изображают неравнодушие.
И Ольга Полякова, ставшая известной благодаря выступлениям в кокошнике, которая вдруг прозрела. И журналистка Рамина, которая отрицает, что ТЦК пакует людей, потому что лично …
❗️На Тайване впервые провели эксперимент по замедлению мобильного интернета.
Цель - проверить, как население будет общаться и функционировать.
А мы продолжаем нашу рубрику о будущем интернета «по паспорту».
8 августа 2026 года Европейская комиссия призвала государства-члены ускорить внедрение верификации возраста в интернете.
Закон, принятый в июле 2026 года, делает Францию первой страной ЕС с полным баном соцсет…
Питер Тиль: "Чтобы прийти к власти, Антихрист пугал бы людей Армагеддоном, а затем предлагал бы их спасти"
И тут же Питер Тиль: "Впереди нас ждёт Армагеддон!!"
И спасти нас может, конечно же, только Palantir?
«По плодам их узнаете их» - Евангелием от Матфея.
В этом отрывке Иисусу предостерегает от лжепророков, которые приходят «в овечьей одежде, а внутри суть волки хищные». Он призывает не обольщаться, а смотреть на результаты их деятельности, на то, к чему они приводят других.
«Матрица» уже наступила.
Как раньше - не будет. Сегодня люди, которые контролируют технологии, почувствовали себя Богами.
Они считают, что вправе решать, кому жить - кому умирать.
Они открыто говорят:
Демократия - зло.
Выборы - зло.
Свобода слова - зло.
Удел человека - камера в Матрице.
Это видео для тех, кто давно со мной. Советую посмотреть всем, кто хочет понимать политику чуть больше, чем заявления Трампа в…
Самый зловещий голос в новом материале - Сергей Чонишвили.
Легенда.
Его голосом говорил Большой Брат в «1984» Оруэлла.
Его голосом звучала империя власти и мессианства в «Дюне» Герберта.
Человек, чьё лицо знают далеко не все, но его голосом звучат антиутопии.
Сергей, спасибо. Для меня большая честь.
Без Вас тема Нового мирового порядка была бы раскрыта не полностью.
ЕС проиграет.
Цифровой суверенитет - звучит нудно. Не по молодежному.
Но сейчас будет интересно.
США обладают своими социальными сетями, облачными вычислениями и мессенджерами.
Китай обладает своими социальными сетями, облачными вычислениями и мессенджерами.
Россия обладает своими социальными сетями, облачными вычислениями и мессенджерами.
У ЕС НЕТ НИЧЕГО СВОЕГО!
Весь мир говорит, что за ИИ будущее. Но у Росси…
Интересные моменты из интервью главы Palantir Алекса Карпа:
- Европейцы опасаются Palantir именно из-за его силы и достижений. Им не хочется признавать собственную слабость и неспособность.
- Отказ от американских ИИ-систем сам по себе не порождает европейскую альтернативу и не даёт технологической независимости.
- Карп позиционирует себя как классического прогрессиста: он считает нужным помогать бедным и готов от…
Еще пример: вчера на меня ссылался Генерал Флинн.
Бывший глава военной разведки США и советник Президента США по национальной безопасности.
Это всего лишь маленькая часть того, что произошло за один день.
Этим хочу показать, что США - неоднородны. Есть влиятельные люди, которые не хотят раскручивать маховик войны.
Мы находимся в диалоге со многими влиятельными политиками в США. Для них я стала первым и самым гром…
❤4,420👍2,450
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @panchenkodi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@panchenkodi edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,607 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dubinsky.pro @dubinskypro · 157,604 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Артем Дмитрук @dmytrukartem · 161,335 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Мисливец Егор @socedinstvo · 185,421 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Дмитрий Никотин @dmitrynikotin · 685,267 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
#МОНТЯН! @montyan2 · 305,225 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Дмитрий Василец @VasiletsDmitriy · 353,085 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Новое Издание @Novoeizdanie · 193,676 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Легитимный @legitimniy · 1,016,832 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Антонов такой Антонов @auantonov · 320,771 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
ЗеРада @zerada1 · 425,065 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Типичная Одесса @odessa_typical · 255,509 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Тайная канцелярия @taynaya_kantselyariya · 439,095 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru) @oper_goblin · 497,493 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
Саня во Флориде @sanya_florida · 917,989 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко @mikle1on · 491,919 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Резидент @rezident_ua · 883,011 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Александр Семченко @AleksandrSemchenko · 241,352 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Вячеслав Володин @vv_volodin · 1,302,806 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Вован и Лексус @Russiacalling · 174,820 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Олег Царёв @olegtsarov · 399,833 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Константин Дараган 🔶 Комментарий астролога️ @daragan_konstantin · 209,208 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Open Ukraine| Открытая Украина @OpenUkraine · 181,509 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
БЕСОГОН @nikitabsg · 393,131 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Петя Первый @Petya_perviy · 235,822 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПАНЧЕНКО” (@panchenkodi), 408,315 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panchenkodi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
