Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -939. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 539,447–540,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:58
539,588
-200
11 Aug 2026, 09:28
539,788
-132
10 Aug 2026, 12:46
539,920
-164
9 Aug 2026, 09:12
540,084
-158
8 Aug 2026, 06:34
540,242
-134
7 Aug 2026, 08:32
540,376
-129
6 Aug 2026, 09:50
540,505
-22
6 Aug 2026, 00:42
540,527
first reading
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.69%
avg views ÷ 539,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,700
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.816%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
90
of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
90 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
2,763,600
Reactions total
22,549
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,600
Videos
≈37,400
Links
≈6,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 48s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19,912 reactions across 79 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
8,823
44.3%
❤
2,836
14.2%
custom 5208952292392313999
1,744
8.76%
🔥
1,497
7.52%
🤬
1,227
6.16%
👍
1,147
5.76%
🗿
905
4.54%
😱
609
3.06%
custom 5208771405549674655
493
2.48%
😭
483
2.43%
🌚
69
0.347%
🤔
38
0.191%
🤝
27
0.136%
⚡
14
0.07%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,549reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 90 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mudak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 90 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.22%
2 of 90 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
25,300
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
32,900
over 88 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqwcU93g
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2W5zFJhGAKs
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Немного конспирологии вам в ленту: Трампа бьют током каждый раз, как он уснёт
В соцсетях уверены, что к президенту США приставили девушку, у которой на животе спрятана кнопка от электрошока — она якобы не дает Трампу уснуть в самый ответственные моменты, т.к. в последнее время он дремает слишком часто.
На видео самый мирный президент задремал во время доклада про аутизм и детские вакцины, но сразу же открыл глаза, …
Кинотеатр в канадском городке на 90 000 жителей был вынужден самостоятельно нарисовать постер для «Человека-паука: Новый день», потому что им не прислали ни одного.
На постере — небольшие извинения от сотрудника, который его рисовал.
Спуди мен, мы тебя узнали
Накуренный пилот чуть не разбил самолёт с пассажирами в Индии
4 августа командир судна выкурил косячок с марихуаной прямо перед рейсом Пхукет-Дели, но вскоре потерял самоконтроль, и самолёт начал резкое снижение, в результате которого пострадали 24 человека.
Избежать авиакатастрофы удалось благодаря второму пилоту. При этом изначально руководство авиакомпании пыталось скрыть истинные причины ЧП, заявив, что инциден…
Хуй! Хуй! Хуйхуйхуй! Хуй! Писька! Хуй!
Прелести низших футбольных дивизионов. Во время матча второй казахстанской лиги в прямую трансляцию случайно попали кричалки местных грозных болельщиков
Wildberries THE END! Приложение ягодной конторы удалили из App Store — но пока только в США.
Его по-прежнему можно скачать через магазины приложений других стран, в том числе российский... пока что
UPD: Wildberries вернули в App Store
Американец с одним из самых маленьких членов в мире сделает операцию по увеличению валыны
38-летний американец Майкл Филлипс, чей половой орган в эрегированном состоянии составляет 0,98 см, решился на операцию. Врач введёт филлер для увеличения обхвата, чтобы помочь ему в повседневной жизни — мужчина даже не мог нормально пользоваться туалетом и носил подгузники. Стоимость процедуры составляет $6000, но благодаря до…
В японском Хвитттере стал популярен краб, который показывает всем свою морскую звезду
Краб из аквариума Касай-Ринкай любит брать морскую звезду и показывать её всем посетителям. Он делал это так часто, что работникам пришлось заменить её на искусственную
В России почти вымерли удалёнщики — их осталось меньше миллиона.
Большая часть — специалисты высшего разряда, которым дают такую привилегию. Остальных же возвращают в офисы или переводят на гибридный формат. Только за прошлый год сотрудников на дистанционке сократилось на 21,8% и осталось всего 968 тысяч человек. К концу 2026 их станет всего 600-800 тысяч человек, прогнозируют эксперты
Бобры НАТО оккупировали Калининградскую область
Местные жители жалуются на бобриную экспансию уже два месяца. Из-за строек водоёмы выходят из берегов, заливают поля и леса. Люди забеспокоились, что останутся без урожая, поэтому решили дать отпор «иностранным захватчикам» — сотня добровольцев разобрала 43 плотины, некоторые прямо у границы с другими странами.
Как пишут СМИ, бобры пришли из Литвы и Польши из-за естес…
Суперкубок УЕФА в Okko: европейский футбол возвращается!
Победители двух главных еврокубков разыграют первый трофей нового сезона. Кому он достанется: грозному «ПСЖ» с Матвеем Сафоновым в воротах или неуступчивой «Астон Вилле» Унаи Эмери?
Узнаем уже сегодня: включай трансляцию в 22:00 и наслаждайся ярким футболом в Okko: https://okko.tv/s/11qb
Российские миллионеры начали заключать фиктивные однополые браки ради ВНЖ Греции
Схема позволяет двум россиянам разделить расходы на «золотую визу»: один гражданин России покупает квартиру в Греции, второй вступает с ним в фиктивный однополый брак — после этого пара оформляет греческий ВНЖ. В итоге каждый из участников схемы тратит всего по 125 тысяч евро вместо 250 (около 24 млн рублей).
Важное условие для схемы —…
Рекорды, о которых вы не просили: россиянин задержан в США с крупнейшей в истории штата партией метамфетамина
По данным СМИ, Антон Раков попался полиции во время проверки на шоссе в штате Луизиана. Стражи порядка остановили его грузовик и обнаружили в прицепе спрятанный метамфетамин. В общей сложности из машины изъяли 358,14 килограммов наркотика.
В управлении шерифа округа назвали эту находку крупнейшей конфискаци…
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @mudak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,810 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 43 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
4chan @ru4chan · 163,936 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Смешные видео😂 @ptencoff · 205,767 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Лепра @Lepragram · 342,561 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Двач @dvachannel · 938,558 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Reddit @Reddit · 163,388 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Dzari @DrDzari · 269,822 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Nation Geographic @NationGeographic · 327,695 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Наука и факты @FactTG · 206,035 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
МЕХАНИК @imehanik · 323,137 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
r/ретранслятор @retra · 165,443 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Yaplakal.com @yaplakal · 423,658 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
КБ @cbpub · 637,809 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Видео Долбоёба @video_dolboeba · 218,017 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Собакен @sobaki_pesik_sobaka · 477,945 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
За рулём @driverone · 464,848 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Факт дня @faktiru · 686,910 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
4ch @why4ch · 1,063,362 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
Это интересно! @very_interesno · 173,487 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Первая передача @firstgear_channel · 200,806 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Игорь, начинайте работу @oplata_skoro_budet · 361,324 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ТОПЛЕС @toplesofficial · 524,377 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
Прокачай Мозг: Айти, Тренды, Технологии @iPumpBrain · 184,405 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Сосисочная @sosicka · 169,249 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Это факт @etofackt · 246,204 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 126 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
MDK (сообщество)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…(ранее)
* {{url|http://vk.com/mudakoff}}
* {{url|https://t.me/mudak|}}
| коммерческий = да
| тип = [[социальные медиа|социальное медиа]]…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MDK” (@mudak), 539,588 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
