Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Роман Зарипов

@romanzaripov

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

56,422subscribers

-247 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567805441
TypeChannel
Username@romanzaripov
DescriptionНикогда не хвалю себя просто так. Вот такой я молодец. Электронная приёмная граждан: @zaripov РКН: https://clck.ru/3Edq7z
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/romanzaripov

Growth

56,42256,66956,545.56 August 2026 — 56,669 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,649 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,615 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,603 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,575 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,536 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,511 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,484 subscribers13 August 2026 — 56,452 subscribers15 August 2026 — 56,422 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,385–56,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:1456,422-30
13 Aug 2026, 17:3856,452-32
12 Aug 2026, 17:4556,484-27
11 Aug 2026, 20:4256,511-25
11 Aug 2026, 00:0156,536-39
10 Aug 2026, 02:2556,575-28
9 Aug 2026, 05:1156,603-12
8 Aug 2026, 06:1056,615-34
7 Aug 2026, 02:4756,649-19
6 Aug 2026, 06:2056,668-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:0456,669first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 56,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (19 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total306,670
Reactions total16,306
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
525
Videos
63
Links
176

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,992 reactions across 23 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,40740.1%
👍2,98618.7%
😁2,43215.2%
🔥1,93312.1%
😢6293.93%
👏4382.74%
💯3462.16%
🤣2081.30%
❤‍🔥1560.975%
🤔540.338%
🏆530.331%
🥰500.313%
🥴450.281%
🤯360.225%
🎉330.206%
💔310.194%
🤡310.194%
🙏280.175%
👎270.169%
🤨200.125%
10 further kinds490.306%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
116
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 24 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romanzaripov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈5,770 views142 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Первая строчка в резюме У большинства из нас первая работа имела довольно мало общего с будущей карьерой. Кто-то начинал с листовок у метро, кто-то разгружал фуры, а кто-то уже в 15 лет осваивал корпоративную среду в фирме маминой подруги. Расскажите про свою первую работу. Что делали, сколько получили и что интересного тогда узнали?

89🔥32🤨20😢1

13 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈7,880 views548 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Экономика одиночества Мы привыкли считать, что налоги устанавливает государство. Но есть ещё один сбор, который зависит от семейного статуса. Назовём его налогом на одиночество, который прячется в аренде, доставках и десятке других бытовых расходов. Давайте посчитаем, сколько приходится доплачивать за жизнь одному. Продукты У еды есть понятная семейная экономика. Хлеб, молоко, зелень, овощи и другие скоропортящие

244💯92😁88👍67🌚11👏10🤔10🥴10

12 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈8,560 views471 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Самые лояльные хейтеры Если вы думаете, что сильнее всего бизнес критикуют те, кто его ненавидит, то есть небольшой парадокс. Часто самыми жесткими критиками бренда часто оказываются его самые преданные клиенты. Происходит это потому, что чем дольше человек пользуется продуктом, тем сильнее привыкает к тому, каким он должен быть. В какой-то момент регулярные покупки начинают восприниматься почти как доля в компани

🔥232130👍95👏11🤔3

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈9,960 views837 reactions8 Starsread 15 August 2026

Как быстро уснуть Пару лет назад наткнулся на интересный способ, как отключить мозг от потока мыслей и быстро уснуть. Скажу честно, проблем с записыванием у меня нет (тут я профессионал), но всё-таки решил попробовать. И вот сюрприз — оно работает. Возьмите достаточно длинное слово, например, «Предупреждение», и начните в уме называть по 5–7 слов на каждую его букву: сначала на «П», потом на «Р» и так далее. По м

👍441210🔥103😁62👏11🌚4🐳3💯3

10 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈10,900 views613 reactions9 Starsread 15 August 2026

Как заработать на чужом эго В начале мая в Интернете было два типа людей. Первые выкладывали видео, где их как бы случайно поймала камера на стадионе во время трансляции. А вторые смотрели на первых и думали: «Ну и бред». Я был во второй категории ровно до субботы, пока в Питере случайно не познакомился с Пашей Шабуровым, 25-летним парнем, который всё это придумал и неплохо монетизировал. Около 1,5 лет назад он со

315🔥173👏55👍29🤯25😁132💯1

9 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈11,500 views1,046 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Бег по граблям Одно из удивительных человеческих качеств — прекрасно понимать последствия некоторых действий и всё равно лично их проверять. Я бегаю уже 8 лет и прекрасно знаю два главных правила забегов: 1. Никаких экспериментов с едой во время старта. 2. Никакой новой одежды и обуви. Поэтому сегодня на полумарафон, где хотелось показать хорошее время, я взял гель, который ни разу не пробовал, и вышел в новых кро

😁586224👍123💯40🤣24🙏24😢11🔥9

7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈11,300 views1,382 reactions37 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Итоги второго года в роли отца Сегодня сыну исполнилось два. И это, кажется, первый раз, когда я могу подводить итоги не столько развития ребёнка, сколько наших с ним отношений. Он всё ещё маленький ребёнок, которому нужна помощь почти во всём, но уже вполне отдельный человек со своими желаниями, характером и принципиальным отказом есть брокколи. Таким его и хочется успеть запомнить, поэтому пишу этот отчёт в том

972🔥203👍101🥰37🎉33❤‍🔥26👏10

6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈11,300 views374 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026

Фитнес на алгоритмах Есть компании, чей настоящий бизнес устроен не совсем так, как принято думать. Например, McDonald’s выглядит как сеть ресторанов, хотя это один из крупнейших операторов недвижимости в мире. Amazon все считают интернет-магазином, хотя главные деньги там давно приносит облачная инфраструктура. И недавно у меня появился ещё один такой пример. Месяц назад на презентации книги я познакомился с Ива

180👍100🔥77👎7🥱3🍾2🖕2🤡2

5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈12,900 views1,042 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Никому нет дела до вас Звучит грубовато, но это лучшая новость, которую вы сегодня услышите. В 1980 году психологи провели эксперимент, который я вспоминаю каждый раз, когда выхожу из дома с прыщом на лбу. Тогда участникам гримом нанесли на лицо заметный шрам и дали посмотреть в зеркало, чтобы они убедились, что этот шрам видно. Затем визажист наносил поверх специальный крем, чтобы грим не пересыхал. Но на самом

601👍212🔥80💯68😁34👏23🤣16👎3

4 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈12,900 views645 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Скидка для уходящих У сервисов по подписке есть одна особенность, которую они редко афишируют — самые щедрые предложения они обычно прячут за кнопкой «Отменить подписку». Дело в том, что пока вы исправно платите, скидка вам как будто ни к чему. Но стоит собраться уходить, и сервис резко вспоминает, насколько сильно дорожит вашими 399 рублями в месяц. В этот момент вы переходите в категорию умирающих клиентов, на с

328🔥134👍88😁54💯26👏8🤡4🍌3

3 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈14,700 views398 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026

Как найти хобби в рилсах Если вы никак не можете придумать себе хобби и в принципе не очень понимаете, что вам интересно — подсказку можно найти в собственной ленте рилсов. Дело в том, что соцсети считывают наши интересы гораздо точнее, чем кажется. В среднем после 150 лайков алгоритм понимает вас лучше, чем родственник, а после 300 — лучше, чем супруг или супруга. Поэтому в поиске новых увлечений можно оттолкнуть

👍228❤‍🔥65🔥4937🤔10👏3👎2🥴2

2 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈13,900 views963 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сыну скоро исполнится два и весь последний год каждую неделю он ходил на гимнастику. Можно ли утверждать, что он полжизни посвятил спорту?

😁626126🤣108💯57👏28👍13🔥3🌚2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @romanzaripov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,181 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,829
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 108,143
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,871
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 110,652
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 105,147
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Роман Зарипов” (@romanzaripov), 56,422 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romanzaripov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.