Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алексей Алешковский. Дневник реакционера

@Aleshkovski

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,850subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371761925
TypeChannel
Username@Aleshkovski
Created21 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aleshkovski

Growth

4,8504,8594,854.56 August 2026 — 4,859 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,859 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,858 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,854 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,850 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,849–4,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:254,850-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:294,854-4
6 Aug 2026, 17:004,858-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:504,859no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:564,859first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.3%
avg views ÷ 4,850 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,600
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held30 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total108,099
Reactions total1,234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,234 reactions across 30 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44335.9%
22718.4%
😁19515.8%
💯1149.24%
👏564.54%
🔥312.51%
😱302.43%
🤣241.94%
211.70%
🙈191.54%
😢141.13%
👎110.891%
🤮90.729%
🤔80.648%
👀70.567%
🤷‍♂70.567%
🤬50.405%
👌40.324%
🙏30.243%
🥰20.162%
4 further kinds40.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC357 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @glebsmith77

ЕС повелел помечать тексты, написанные ИИ. Со 2 августа заработала статья 50 AI Act (я о нем писал). Anthropic объяснила, как исполняет требование. Claude по секретному ключу незаметно смещает выбор слов между равнозначными вариантами. Глазом не видно, смысл не меняется, но владелец ключа считает статистику и говорит: текст прошёл через модель. Решение изящное технически и абсолютно бессмысленное практически – буквал

👍1852

Signed Алексей Алешковский

11 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC745 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Печатному верили, а в особенности иностранным ведомостям, ибо если и за морем врут, то где ж правду искать? Д.Мережковский, "Антихрист"

😁268👍5

Signed Алексей Алешковский

11 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC761 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

СВОЙ-ЧУЖОЙ Обратил внимание, что подавляющее большинство участников фейсбучных склок совершенно не интересуется формальным поводом для разговора. Диалог начинается с вербального обнюхивания на предмет обнаружения "свой-чужой", и продолжается моральным уничтожением собеседника. Любопытно, что при этом практически любой актуальный текст имеет политический контекст и этический подтекст (в координатах примерно от Гитл

👍29😁3

Signed Алексей Алешковский

11 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC776 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Интерес к истории российского человека напоминает мне интерес больного, выкравшего из регистратуры поликлиники историю своей болезни, которую от него долго прятали, и пытающегося понять, что же там написано плохим почерком. Лев Новожёнов

😁26💯10

Signed Алексей Алешковский

10 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,120 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Иноагент Становая видит причину снятия с выборов «в поддержке Яблока со стороны выдавленной из страны оппозиции». Что и неудивительно: поддержка этих пародийных персонажей звучит как «Голосуйте за расчленение России!» Яблоко, конечно, не про это, но с такими друзьями и врагов не надо. Не то чтоб я особо радовался или сокрушался (инклюзивности ради и сам мог бы за них проголосовать), но кастрюлеголовые в очередной раз

👍33👏6

Signed Алексей Алешковский

9 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,160 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Иван Иваныч раскопал замечательное про механизм сторителлинга: «В 1944 году психологи Фриц Хайдер и Марианна Зиммель показали 114 испытуемым короткий немой фильм: по экрану двигались два треугольника, кружок и прямоугольник с открывающейся, как дверь, стороной. Больше в кадре ничего не было — ни лиц, ни жестов, ни звука, только геометрические фигуры и их перемещения. Испытуемых просили одно: написать, что они увидели

👍2812😁2

Signed Алексей Алешковский

9 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,190 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

— Кто вам сказал, что если вы считаете себя бездарным говном, это обесценивание, а не зрелая самооценка? — А вы правда доктор?..

😁47👍14💯2😢2

Signed Алексей Алешковский

9 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈21,800 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Во всякое переходное время подымается эта сволочь, которая есть в каждом обществе, и уже не только безо всякой цели, но даже не имея и признака мысли, а лишь выражая собою изо всех сил беспокойство и нетерпение. Между тем эта сволочь, сама не зная того, почти всегда подпадает под команду той малой кучки «передовых», которые действуют с определенною целью, и та направляет весь этот сор куда ей угодно, если только сама

👍49👏127😢2🤝1

Signed Алексей Алешковский

8 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,430 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Либеральная интеллигенция начинает чувствовать, когда нужно думать, а думать — когда нужно чувствовать

27😁15🔥5👍4

Signed Алексей Алешковский

8 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC≈2,110 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

УРОКИ ИСТОРИИ Митрополит Андрей Шептицкий — Николаю II (март 1914 г.): Православно-католический митрополит Галицкий и Львовский, много лет желающий и готовый ежедневно жертвовать своей жизнью за благо и спасение Святой Руси и Вашего Императорского Величества, повергает к ногам Вашего Императорского Величества сердечнейшие благопожелания и радостный привет по случаю завершающегося объединения остальных частей Русско

😁24🙈19👍6🤬4👌1

Signed Алексей Алешковский

4 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC≈2,590 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Работает ли ядерное сдерживание? Иван Иваныч неожиданно напомнил о том, что не стоит принимать на веру вроде бы очевидное: «Ядерное сдерживание работает на самом верхнем, апокалиптическом уровне (предотвращая прямой обмен ядерными ударами между державами), но при этом оно развязывает руки для агрессии на всех уровнях ниже. Это называется парадоксом стабильности-нестабильности. Суть его в том, что когда две стороны

👍231👎1👏1🕊1

Signed Алексей Алешковский

3 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,750 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если дать творческую свободу петуху, он все равно будет кукарекать Довлатов

👍2216💯11

Signed Алексей Алешковский

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Aleshkovski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,069 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алексей Алешковский. Дневник реакционера” (@Aleshkovski), 4,850 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aleshkovski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.