13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,356–47,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 16:35
47,407
+13
16 Aug 2026, 08:46
47,394
+18
14 Aug 2026, 20:48
47,376
-12
13 Aug 2026, 08:48
47,388
-30
12 Aug 2026, 06:22
47,418
-17
11 Aug 2026, 04:27
47,435
+15
10 Aug 2026, 04:37
47,420
-19
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
47,439
-23
8 Aug 2026, 06:11
47,462
-26
7 Aug 2026, 05:23
47,488
-19
6 Aug 2026, 03:40
47,507
+2
6 Aug 2026, 01:46
47,505
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:30
47,505
first reading
Engagement
178 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 47,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,440
178 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
178
of 178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
178 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
969,180
Reactions total
48,977
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,500
Videos
≈5,560
Links
≈7,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
31m 23s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45,199 reactions across 162 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
9,994
22.1%
🤡
8,478
18.8%
🤮
3,531
7.81%
🔥
3,491
7.72%
😁
3,329
7.37%
❤
2,607
5.77%
🤣
2,408
5.33%
🕊
2,051
4.54%
😢
1,536
3.40%
👍
1,440
3.19%
🤯
1,153
2.55%
👏
904
2.00%
👎
813
1.80%
💔
764
1.69%
😭
615
1.36%
😱
613
1.36%
🙏
344
0.761%
❤🔥
146
0.323%
🗿
100
0.221%
🍾
81
0.179%
38 further kinds
801
1.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48,977reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 178 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prosleduet_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 178 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Минцифры создаст орган предварительной цензуры книг — «единый центр госэкспертизы книг»
…издатели и продавцы уже не понимают, какие книги ещё можно продавать, а какие — уже нельзя.
Министерство готовит законопроект, который наделит Экспертный центр при Российском книжном союзе полномочиями государственной экспертизы, пишет «Коммерсант». Фактически единый орган будет заранее решать, соответствует ли книга российским…
Бензин остался лишь на 28% российских АЗС — Известия
На 16 августа топливо было только на 28,1% заправок страны, тогда как неделей ранее — на 41%, пишут «Известия» со ссылкой на приложение «ГдеБЕНЗ». В Москве и области журналисты проверили 21 АЗС: АИ-92 нашли на семи, АИ-95 — на шести, АИ-98 — на пяти.
С начала лета ФАС возбудила 30 дел против нефтяных компаний и независимых АЗС — почти втрое больше, чем за первые …
Уехавшего из России политика Бориса Надеждина оштрафовали на 10 тысяч рублей за интервью «Медузе»
Решение принял Никулинский суд Москвы, сообщает «Медиазона». Политика признали виновным в участии в деятельности «нежелательной организации». Защита заявила, что Надеждин не связан с каналами «Медузы» и не мог отслеживать статус всех СМИ, которым давал интервью.
@prosleduet_media
Российские бизнесмены «добровольно» скинулись в бюджет на рекордные 384 млрд рублей
В конце марта на съезде РСПП якобы от некоторых крупных предпринимателей прозвучала инициатива о добровольных пожертвованиях в бюджет, который уже не вывозит военные расходы.
К середине августа поступления от добровольных взносов достигли 384 млрд рублей, пишут «Ведомости» со ссылкой на данные «Электронного бюджета». Это в полтора р…
Вечером 17 августа активистов задерживали неподалеку от их домов после поддержки «Яблока» у Верховного суда
Как минимум двух молодых людей задержали по разным адресам и доставили в полицию, сообщает «Слово защите» со ссылкой на правозащитника Максима Руднева. Им вменяют нарушение правил участия в публичной акции из-за событий у Верховного суда 10 августа. По словам Руднева, к активистам приходят сотрудники Центра «Э…
Бензина нет, вторая серия
Дефицит топлива вернулся в Россию в еще более тяжелой форме: на этот раз пустуют от 30% до 50% АЗС, а очереди выстроились в Москве и Санкт-Петербурге. И вслед за топливным кризисом страну может ждать всплеск продовольственной инфляции и регулирование цен.
Пока танкеры с индийским бензином застревают в портах из-за споров о конечной стоимости, удары по НПЗ и логистическим складам ставят под…
1, 3, 4… ЦИК исключил «Яблоко» из бюллетеня на выборах в Госдуму
В федеральном бюллетене осталось десять партий, сообщает ТАСС.
Номер 2, который по итогам жеребьёвки достался «Яблоку», не будут передавать другой партии. Поэтому в нумерации списка после исключения «Яблока» останется пропуск.
@prosleduet_media
Россиян начали штрафовать и задерживать за жалобы на отсутствие бензина
Суд в Волгограде оштрафовал Татьяну Сметанко на 10 тысяч рублей за участие в коллективном обращении к главе СК Александру Бастрыкину, обратила внимание «Медиазона». 16 июля пятеро жителей записали у заправки видео о дефиците топлива. Они пожаловались, что чиновникам заливают полные баки по топливным картам, тогда как горожанам отказывают. Участн…
Учёные провели магнитного робота сквозь ткань мозга
Исследователи испытали семимиллиметрового робота в форме винта, который движется внутри мозга под управлением внешнего магнита. Устройство прошло через ткань овечьего мозга, а затем вернулось по проделанному каналу. В желатиновой модели робот достигал целей с точностью менее миллиметра.
Учёные разработали способ рассчитывать безопасную скорость устройства в тканях…
Менеджер Канье Уэста подтвердил предстоящие концерты в России. Многие опасаются, что скрепам предстоит серьёзное испытание
….Доносчик Виталий Бородин потребовал отменить концерты. Депутат Николай Новичков допустил обращение в Минкульт и Генпрокуратуру, если рэпер не поддержит Россию и войну, а Елена Драпеко выразила надежду, что Уэст «исправился» после антисемитских высказываний, но отметила, что визит артиста приоб…
«Они даже не люди». Министр нацбезопасности Израиля предложил убивать в Газе по 30–40 человек каждую ночь
Итамар Бен-Гвир — один из наиболее радикальных политиков в правительстве Биньямина Нетаньяху. Он не командует армией, но как министр несёт ответственность за работу полиции и Службы тюрем, находящихся в ведении его министерства.
📣 Я считаю, что в Газе следует проводить целенаправленные убийства, уничтожая от 30…
«Яблоко» обжалует решение о снятии партии с выборов в ГД в президиуме Верховного суда, рассказал Николай Рыбаков
Председатель «Яблока» добавил, что у партии есть некий «план Б», но о деталях обещал сообщить позднее.
📣 Всем большое спасибо, что сегодня снова пришли и показываете своим зрителям и читателям, что происходит. Потому что, конечно, реального судебного процесса сегодня не было. Это была имитация судебного …
💔282🙏92🕊45👍10❤5👀2🔥2🤪2
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @prosleduet_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Викторина, друзья! Угадайте, представителем какой из этих профессий Лукашенко себя никогда НЕ называл:
Гранатомётчик9%
Историк1%
Конферансье22%
Экономист1%
Фотограф8%
Футболист4%
Диктатор47%
Политолог8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 55,335 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Екатерина Дунцова @Duntsova · 109,968 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Максим Кац @maximkatz · 154,425 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Вёрстка @svobodnieslova · 113,438 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Антон Хардин @anton_hardin_official · 138,150 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Команда Навального @teamnavalny · 123,831 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продолжение следует” (@prosleduet_media), 47,407 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prosleduet_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.