Директор Лиги безопасного интернета, член Общественной палаты России
Сообщить об опасном контенте:
https://ligainternet.ru/#hotline
Обратная связь: @ekaterinamizulina_bot
Бот конкурсов @ligakonkurs_bot
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673c580b1039886b1
Created
24 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net +10,307. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 923,261–938,926 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 00:38
935,401
-289
18 Sept 2026, 17:18
935,690
-604
16 Sept 2026, 08:37
936,294
-824
14 Sept 2026, 17:38
937,118
+5,560
13 Sept 2026, 05:39
931,558
+1,971
11 Sept 2026, 09:37
929,587
+239
8 Sept 2026, 18:39
929,348
+83
5 Sept 2026, 14:18
929,265
-145
3 Sept 2026, 16:19
929,410
-304
2 Sept 2026, 10:47
929,714
-1,078
1 Sept 2026, 12:05
930,792
+1,644
31 Aug 2026, 09:04
929,148
+3,323
30 Aug 2026, 09:25
925,825
+601
29 Aug 2026, 06:02
925,224
-842
28 Aug 2026, 09:16
926,066
+287
27 Aug 2026, 12:42
925,779
-382
26 Aug 2026, 14:43
926,161
+64
25 Aug 2026, 17:27
926,097
+925
24 Aug 2026, 16:13
925,172
-1,274
22 Aug 2026, 22:17
926,446
first reading
Engagement
679 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 935,401 subscribers
Avg views / post
133,000
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 679 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
679 (20 April 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
13,213,700
Reactions total
308,788
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,500
Videos
≈4,820
Links
≈1,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 06m
Average length
1m 27s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
6 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
3.0 hours: 44,600 → 6.0 hours: 65,900 → 12 hours: 96,500still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
5.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
533,666 reactions across 176 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
167,042
31.3%
🔥
62,966
11.8%
😱
57,168
10.7%
💔
43,977
8.24%
🤣
28,853
5.41%
⚡
24,032
4.50%
❤🔥
22,944
4.30%
🤬
20,157
3.78%
👍
17,920
3.36%
👏
13,754
2.58%
😨
11,161
2.09%
💯
10,463
1.96%
💘
9,884
1.85%
😢
9,507
1.78%
😁
7,067
1.32%
🙏
6,885
1.29%
🥰
4,209
0.789%
🤯
3,654
0.685%
😍
2,420
0.453%
😘
2,270
0.425%
11 further kinds
7,333
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 678 of the 679 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,128,613 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 679 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В последние дни часто приходят письма от подростков, которых новые знакомые из разных чатов заставляют «извиняться» в кружках перед террористическими организациями с Украины.
Такие кружки с извинениями просят записать по одной причине - дальше с их помощью подростков шантажируют, угрожая слить видео в публичный доступ. Нередко после записи таких кружков звонят фейковые сотрудники ФСБ и МВД. Под давлением заставляют…
Сегодня в соцсетях распространяется письмо мамы школьника из Калуги. Женщина рассказывает о том, что на её сына, ученика школы номер 6, напал одноклассник. Парень налетел со спины, пытался выколоть мальчику глаза, разодрал щеку изнутри, исцарапал лицо. Школьник сидел на уроке весь в крови и в порванной одежде, при этом администрации школы на месте не оказалось.
Женщина заявляет, что обратилась в полицию. За две неде…
После огласки ситуации с тараканами в студенческом общежитии ректор Государственного университета по землеустройству был уволен. Надеюсь, что новый ректор сможет решить проблему с антисанитарией и состоянием общежитий
Удивительная история произошла в Нижневартовске: там педагог, которая обозвала школьницу проституткой, не только была восстановлена на работе судом, но и взыскала компенсацию с учебного заведения за увольнение
Громкая история с увольнением педагога из Детской школы искусств №1 закончилась ее победой суде. Она не только восстановилась в должности, но и отсудила у учреждения 912 тысяч рублей.
История началась летом 2…
Интересно, а все эти деятели платят налоги? Тысячи таких шарлатанов заседают в тиктоке и стримят круглосуточно, в результате чего миллиарды рублей уплывают мимо казны.
Как сделать мощный заговор, чтобы налоговая на них обратила внимание?😁
Вот пример как проходит социально-психологическое тестирование в МБОУ СОШ 7 города Сургута. Педагог-психолог ходит по классу и говорит ученикам, как отвечать на эти тесты. У меня в предложке еще много подобных видео/аудио из разных городов. Смысл какой в этом всем тогда?
PS Это видео просто для иллюстрации. Так происходит во многих регионах. Учителя стараются помочь детям не попасть «в зону риска»
В последние дни из разных регионов приходят письма от школьников и студентов по поводу того, что в учебных заведениях принуждают подписывать «добровольное» согласие на прохождение социально-психологического тестирования.
В случае отказа родителей подписать согласие школьников обещают вызвать к завучу или отправить к наркологу. А студентам угрожают занижением оценок.
При этом, сами учителя говорят о том, что с них я…
Новый конкурс. Совсем скоро мы будем отмечать день учителя. Я знаю, что у многих из вас есть любимые учителя и преподаватели в школе, колледже или вузе. У кого-то в школе работает мама, папа или бабушка. А кто-то вспоминает с теплотой своего первого учителя. Запишите видео/кружок для ваших учителей. Можете прочитать стихотворение, спеть, вспомнить какую-то интересную историю или просто сказать добрые слова - любой кр…
Это нарушение прав ребенка.
Уже неоднократно прокуратуры в разных регионах выносили предписания школам после наших обращений в Генпрокуратуру в 2024 и 2025 году.
Но эта печальная практика продолжается в школах, судя по письмам. Понятно, что так школы пытаются бороться с курением вейпов и хулиганством в туалетах, но это отнюдь не лучший способ. В итоге многим детям приходится терпеть до дома (на переменах попасть в т…
Showing the 12 most recent of 679 posts we hold for @ekaterina_mizulina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ekaterina_mizulina edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 256 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 182 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дядя Батя @Dyadyabatya0 · 205,858 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
GB FAMILY @GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 101,292 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
ЛИПИХИНЫ home юмор 1 @lipikhina_home · 31,261 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 5 September 2026
NAME. @RETURNNAME · 80,916 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 August 2026
KANARI_🇰🇷🇰🇿 @kanariyls · 31,559 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026
Samburskaya @samburskayan · 35,053 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Савва Кулаков @savvakulakov777 · 27,565 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Цитаты Джейсона Стетхема @jas_statham · 60,053 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
VNNV — криминал и новости @vnnva4 · 44,167 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
enina24 @ane4ka24 · 108,005 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
Почти придумала | Динара Курбанова @mamina_dinara · 29,160 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Расскажи, Москва @vmoskve198 · 277,745 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 15 August 2026
Брюнетка в шоколаде 🎀 @doraadaryya · 27,691 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 10 September 2026
Праздники на каждый день @segodnia_prazdnik · 52,462 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
3д человеки и пикчи @belie_chelovechki · 32,865 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 September 2026
Мистер Бизнес @biznesuhaaaa · 46,409 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
Джарахов Эльдар Казанфарович крутой рэпер офигенный тиктокер и вообще очень талантливый человек @dzharakhov1 · 97,520 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
РИМ 🕊 @rhymesrim · 294,808 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Тесты и точка. @test_dot · 519,044 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 August 2026
олежка @singantoleg · 27,784 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Матрёшка ❤️ @matreshkka777 · 37,784 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
МОРОЗИКИ @slavkamorozoff · 50,889 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026
ХАМКА @my_hamka · 79,995 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
missalena.92 @shishkovaalena · 32,569 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1,197 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Jekaterina Michailowna Misulina(de.wikipedia.org) “…[[Jaroslaw Jurjewitsch Dronow|Shaman]]{{Internetquelle |url=https://t.me/ekaterina_mizulina/12833 |titel=Post im Telegram-Kanal von Jekaterina Misulina…” read 13 September 2026
Igor Shchyogolev(en.wikipedia.org) “…media/forumbudushee/}}{{cite news |url=https://t.me/ekaterina_mizulina/727 |title=Екатерина Мизулина |trans-title=Ekaterina Mizulina…” read 13 September 2026
Литвин, Михаил Андреевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…также присвоении ему воинского звания «рядовой»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ekaterina_mizulina/15208|title=Екатерина Мизулина|website=Telegram|acces…” read 13 September 2026
Мизулина, Екатерина Михайловна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…media/forumbudushee/ |url-status=live }}{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/ekaterina_mizulina/727 |title=Сначала зачистим Украину от нациков и бандеровцев…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Екатерина Мизулина” (@ekaterina_mizulina), 935,401 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekaterina_mizulina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
