Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кожаная Госпожа

Channel

Кожаная Госпожа

@skingospozha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,664subscribers

-2,418 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001433190060
TypeChannel
Username@skingospozha
DescriptionГузаль Раевская, спикер, эксперт эстетической косметологии, wellness Реклама @pr_skingospozha Консультации @consult_skingospozha РКН https://clck.ru/3QFvus ePN
Created27 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skingospozha

Growth

24,66427,08225,8736 August 2026 — 27,082 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,784 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,747 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,821 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,824 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,920 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,662 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,057 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,664 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2,418. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,301–27,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:1824,664-393
13 Aug 2026, 07:0425,057-605
12 Aug 2026, 03:4225,662-258
11 Aug 2026, 01:4725,920+96
10 Aug 2026, 00:0225,824+3
8 Aug 2026, 20:2825,821+74
7 Aug 2026, 18:2325,747-1,037
6 Aug 2026, 16:3026,784-298
6 Aug 2026, 02:3727,082first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.99%
avg views ÷ 24,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held45 (1 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total108,414
Reactions total3,009
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,350
Videos
760
Links
1,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,968 reactions across 31 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
95748.6%
🔥42721.7%
🥰1547.83%
💘1296.55%
💯663.35%
😁512.59%
😱452.29%
👍422.13%
👏271.37%
261.32%
❤‍🔥231.17%
😍80.407%
💋60.305%
50.254%
🎉20.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,009reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC248 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вот вам и Смешарики! 🐈 В котячем (ну какой у меня щенячий, подумайте тоже) восторге от коллекции @beautybomb со Смешариками. Буквально каждый продукт в моем сердечко, но особенно хвалю: • румяна (у меня обе пары, лавандовые, конечно, хороши) • продукты для губ (темный тинт вне всяких похвал) Карандаш на мой вкус чуть слабоват, здесь пока выигрывают другие коллекции бренда, но в целом Смешарики точно удались 🤩 Та

4🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC266 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥3😍2

15 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,400 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

• что я ем с мужем • что я ем одна Не только у меня одной такое? Без партнера рядом и сосиска с огурцом сгодится?

💯36🥰119😁6

14 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈2,390 views70 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Все гоняются за агрессивными активами, а настоящая работа происходит тихо. Я часто вижу, как бренды и блогеры делают ставку на высокие концентрации кислот, ретинола, витамина С в диких процентах. И вроде бы иногда логично – чем выше процент, тем эффективнее и быстрее сработает средство. а вроде бы и нет, проблема в том, что кожа – это не батарейка, её нельзя просто зарядить мощным активом и ждать чудесного преображе

39🔥18💘13

14 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,280 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

StyleKorean для России все! Не знаю как реагировать на эту новость. С одной стороны, пишут про логистику, а с другой – червячок сомнения. Не хочется быть тем, кто не замечает слона в комнате. В целом, у меня всегда были смешанные ощущения: Покупать выгодно, но и 100500 ненужных банок потом у девочек разгребай, которые им и не нужны + портят кожу. Не жалко, не удивительно, но как будто бы обидно за покупателей. В

32

14 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,600 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Деточка, ну куда тебе ботокс этот ваш, будешь вся страшная, некрасивая, неживая, тебе навязали стандарты красоты Я вижу эти комментарии под каждым вторым постом про ботулотоксин. И каждый раз хочется спросить: – кто эти великие диванные эксперты? сразу вспоминаю высказывание Настеньки Волочковой – понимают ли они, что зачастую многим токсин уже поздно? Когда надо начинать – вопрос индивидуальный (я так-то первый

38👍9👏3

14 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈2,280 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @sncmagPhoto

Какие-то мощные молодильные яблоки: Алина Кабаева себе лет 15 точно скрутила!

315

14 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC≈2,450 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @eto_tochno_ppVideo

Так выглядит жизнь бедолаг, судорожно считающих кбжу огурца в попытках похудеть. А ведь можно просто сохранить эти похудительные рецепты и кайфовать каждый день…

😁298🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,550 views59 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

С учетом нынешнего лета, подготовка теперь будет к моему ДР и Новому Году💩 В связи с чем несу вам пирожки из картошечки (почти что советская классика), на которых худеться будет вкусно и без стратегического удара по косметическому бюджету! Забирайте этот и другие рецепты от человека, скинувшего 45кг (мое почтение!) 🍑

33💘11🔥11🎉2👍2

13 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,390 views73 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Официально, это лето обзову масочным! Столько прекрасных представителей этой категории за такой короткий срок я еще не обозревала. И опять наши постарались – ‘Am code не так давно выпустили 2 новинки: • collagen booster я бы назвала ее полноценным анти эйдж средством – увлажнение, восстановление и уплотнение. Все, что по сути нам и нужно с течением времени • lympho drain одна из лучших моих масок в этом сегменте

34🔥19💘14👍5🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,430 views82 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мы дождались! Я всё гадала, кто же из наших брендов возьмет на себя тяжкий груз – адаптировать ретро эстетику Матье Блази (восхищения можно почитать тут). И Lime умницы 9️⃣ До чего красивый твид, шерсть, черевички. В восторге от сочетаний цветов (коралловые, нежно розовые, Тиффани, оливковые и шоколадные оттенки) и фактур в этом сезоне (твид, замша, велюр). На мне уж точно увидите всё не единожды… И, главное, колл

46🔥19🥰11👍6

13 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈2,250 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Голову с телесами помыла, а чем и как даже не поделилась🧐 Говорю же, косметическая деменция у вашей Госпожи По волосам все просто: 🛁 вчерашний пилинг от Anna Gale 🛁 шампунь Dr Marcus Heiler в рамках работы с себореей (чередую с шампунями для окрашенных волос) 🛁 кондиционер увлажняющий от Laminaria expert, базовый, приятный, цвет не вымывает, за что ему огромное спасибо! За кадром еще лосьоны time to grow, LED р

25🔥9🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @skingospozha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 148,053 of 1,480,740entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кожаная Госпожа” (@skingospozha), 24,664 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skingospozha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.