Channel
@beautybymaya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,242subscribers
+300 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001070836138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @beautybymaya |
| Created | 13 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/beautybymaya |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 13,242 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 13,237 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 13,228 | +3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 13,225 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 13,213 | +18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 13,195 | -38 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 13,233 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 13,217 | +17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 13,200 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 13,209 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 13,219 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 13,234 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 13,243 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 13,246 | +23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 13,223 | +41 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 13,182 | +63 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 13,119 | +10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 13,109 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 13,104 | +42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 13,062 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,140 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 821 | 72.0% | |
| 🔥 | 133 | 11.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 53 | 4.65% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 2.81% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 2.46% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 1.75% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 1.67% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 1.58% | |
| 🤗 | 12 | 1.05% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.175% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.088% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.088% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Первый раз за лето выбралась на дачу, тут еще осталась земляника, колосятся тыблоки, которые норовят свалиться на голову, а еще можно по мокрой травке походить босиком. Вечером закидаю вас фотками с шашлыком, но это не точно. Больше всего я не люблю в таких поездках паковаться. А вдруг понадобится примерно все, особенно, когда уезжаешь и градусник показывает +30, а потом резко падает в обморок до +16 и дождей, но, с…
❤6🥰4🔥2
Ну, погнали! Вопросики? Отвечаю до 23 часов😆
❤🔥23❤9🔥5
Я тут начинаю подумывать, а не пойти ли мне на какие-нибудь актерские курсы, но сначала, пожалуй, магистерскую защищу, а то я порвусь 😆
❤38
Вы, может, со мной не согласитесь, но мне кажется, что работа актеров мюзикла одна из самых сложных. Надо не просто хорошо петь, но еще и играть и танцевать одновременно. Тут иногда одно бы что-то сделать классно, извините 😆 Осенью нас ждет новая постановка - «Призрак мюзикла, или Что опять не так». По сюжету коллектив семиозёрского театра «Отверженные» уже в Москве и вовсю сочиняет новаторскую версию легендарного …
❤24❤🔥8💯4
Girls, мне неимоверно больно нарушать привычный порядок, но печенечки перенесутся за завтра. Готовьте вопросики заранее 🌸
❤49
Кстати, девочки. Погоды стоят прекрасные, но есть одно «но». Не знаю как вы, я лично потею чуть больше, а это значит, что воспалений у меня на теле становится больше. Как и гиперкератоза. Про это вообще мало пишут, но в зонах с повышенным трением и потливостью не только прыщики вылезают, но и темноватые пятна, которые абсолютно безобидные и абсолютно не эстетичные. Способы борьбы и с тем, и с другим, кстати, одина…
❤34👍12🔥9
Если кто сомневается, то у меня пруф есть 🤣
❤17
Я тут обзавелась, как вы знаете, одним устройством, но мануала не нашла. Поэтому сама написала инструкцию по применению универсального бьюти-гаджета «Кот 1.0». Распространите😆 Ну, это у меня такая версия, у вас, возможно, уже какая-то более продвинутая 🤣 Можете в комментариях свои пункты добавить аххаха)) Итак, кот. Комплектация: -Гаджет поставляется в стандартной комплектации, тулово шерстяное 1 шт (есть модели …
❤60❤🔥22🥰13😁10
Есть в прошлом видео строчечка, от которой больно, это вот которая что без отеков не напиться. Но сразу видно, человеку повезло ахахах. Мне даже напиваться не надо, достаточно вот насморк схватить. Лежу сегодня, значит, с мыслями, что вчера я еще умела петь, а сегодня уже нет, но лежу эффективно, девочки, продуманно лежу. Сначала помазалась любимым лимфодренажным тоником. Это база. Потом масочку увлажняющую очень …
❤35🔥13💯6
Доброе утро, девочки. Я сегодня в костюме царицы :) Вчера цепанула какой-то вирус, отменила все планы. Буду вам надоедать и лечиться :) На видео, кстати, директор моей школы по вокалу Алина Деймос :) как она чувствует!
❤38🤗12🔥11⚡1
Кот дня!
❤77🔥26😁15
Единственный нюанс, я не люблю готовить, а еще больше не люблю придумывать, что приготовить. Зато вот нашла у Даши шикарную подборку высокобелковых рецептов и хотя бы этот головняк с меня снялся (слава яйцам)))). Вообще у нее там кроме таких подборок много всяких идей для готовки и обзоров едальных мест, голодными и на ночь канал не читайте (я предупредила )))
❤36🔥6👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @beautybymaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Утомленная банками | Beauty by Maya” (@beautybymaya), 13,242 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/beautybymaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.