Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КРЕМЦО НА ЛИЦО

Channel

КРЕМЦО НА ЛИЦО

@marish21skin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,027subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216840651
TypeChannel
Username@marish21skin
Created18 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marish21skin

Growth

11,02711,08511,0567 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,080 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,076 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,074 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,071 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,063 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,060 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,045 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,035 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,027 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 13 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,018–11,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 10:3711,027-8
19 Aug 2026, 07:4811,035-10
18 Aug 2026, 09:0311,045-8
17 Aug 2026, 09:5611,053-7
15 Aug 2026, 17:4711,060-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:3711,063-8
12 Aug 2026, 21:5611,071-3
11 Aug 2026, 23:3511,074-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:0111,076-4
8 Aug 2026, 23:5011,080-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:4611,083-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:0011,085no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:5111,085first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.25%
avg views ÷ 11,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held9 (18 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,040
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

306 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥13744.8%
🔥9731.7%
👍4916.0%
💯175.56%
😱61.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 9 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marish21skin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC770 views29 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

На этих выходных приехала малейшая рассылка от любимых Beauty Zone , Magic Art и Palais des Thes. Я уже давно не пью пакетированный чай, но чай Palais des Thes для меня стал открытием! У них милейшие муслиновые пакетики, которые абсолютно экологичны для человека и планеты ❤️ Высочайшее качество чая и эстетика во всем 🐯 Бренд представляет в Beauty Zone, там даже можно его выпить ☺️

🔥18❤‍🔥6👍5

23 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,270 views71 reactions24 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Немного lady in red вам в ленту ❤️

❤‍🔥40🔥23👍8

21 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,270 views25 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Продолжая тему wellness, то мое умное колечко oura rings 4 все еще трудится у меня на пальце!😎 Тут писала про него Вот так оно выглядит Правда вышла новая версия и она тоньше и как будто бы эстетичнее, но как-то и жалко покупать новое, только из-за эстетики, поэтому надо почитать есть ли еще какие-то новые функции! И вот уже неделю мой сон фиксируется, как очень плохой!)) Приветик передает скачок роста и паралл

❤‍🔥13🔥8💯4

21 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,570 views34 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Я никогда не была фанатом фитнесс зала, но пришлось признать, что надо начать, потому что после 30 лет в организме запускается процесс естественной потери мышечной массы — саркопения. 😢 Очень полезные посты, которые мне было очень важно прочитать, вам тоже рекомендую, если вы хоть как-то интересуетесь спортом! 🩷Почему хочется бросить тренироваться. 💜Самые глупые советы в похудении 🩷Пост про отеки 💜Спорт после 40.

👍18🔥12💯4

20 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,520 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026

А теперь поговорим о молекулярных несмываемых масках и средстве для роста волос в красном флаконе. 💜Вот сейчас у меня уже четвертая маска в использовании (все разных брендов) и я прихожу к мнению, что если вас не устраивает качество волос, то их нужно срезать. Хотя расскажите про свой опыт, всегда интересно почитать. 🩷Так же использую сыворотку для роста и выпадения от Fabao. Вот уже около 3 недель, эффекта не виж

❤‍🔥12👍8🔥4

20 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,560 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Нашла еще один годный шампунь! Вообще, я редко могу остаться в восторге от шампуня, потому что волосы у меня после обесцвечивания требуют особого ухода. Чаще всего, я даже не делаю на него ставку, т.к. не жду какого-то ухаживающего действия. НО! После тестирования молекулярных несмываемых масок я поняла, что если шампунь так себе, я не смогу даже расчесать волосы (кто знает, тот поймёт),поэтому начала опять искать

❤‍🔥17🔥13💯7

19 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,600 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Девочки, посоветуйте самый легкий и сияющий консилер, который не забивается в складки. Еще нужен легкий, подсвечивающий тональный крем, похожий по текстуре на эссенцию. Рассматриваю еще кушон Genosys; если у кого-то был опыт, расскажите, какой он.

👍10❤‍🔥9💯2

18 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,840 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Как раз нашла разбор макияжа, ну такая красота!

❤‍🔥19🔥7😱3

18 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,010 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не могу пройти мимо образов Зендаи в рамках промо-тура «Одиссеи»! 🌸Мой самый любимый, это образ от Matières Fécales. Вдохновением стала Ника Самофракийская— знаменитая статуя с огромными крыльями, считающуюся одним из главных сокровищ Лувра. 🌸Корсетный образ Schiaparelli. 🌸Образ от Louis Vuitton 🌼Givenchy Haute Couture весна–лето 1997 А какой образ понравился вам больше всего? ❤️

❤‍🔥21🔥12😱3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @marish21skin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КРЕМЦО НА ЛИЦО” (@marish21skin), 11,027 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marish21skin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.